On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:37:48PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
In sec 5.4.2 MASTER_SITES in the porter handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html#AEN1512
the example given is:
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU}
netatalk 2.2.0 fails to compile for me.
Making all in acl
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/net/netatalk/work/netatalk-2.2.0/libatalk/acl'
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -std=gnu99
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/include -I../../include
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: enigma-1.01_7: no entry for /usr/ports/archivers/zipios++
make_index: enigma-1.01_7: no entry for /usr/ports/archivers/zipios++
Committers on the hook:
bapt bf hrs oliver sunpoet
Most recent CVS update was:
U
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to build math/R. Compilation went fine, but when I try to
'make install' I get the following error:
ERROR: 'texi2dvi' needed but missing on your system.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/math/R/work/R-2.13.1/doc/manual.
*** Error code 1 (ignored)
cd: can't
Doug wrote:
Unfortunately the only way to improve on this would be to not do the
checks on a port-by-port basis, and do them all together at the end.
While that sounds appealing, it would dramatically increase the code
complexity, and also dramatically increase the chances of leaving the
pkg
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Benjamin Stier wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to build math/R. Compilation went fine, but when I try to
'make install' I get the following error:
ERROR: 'texi2dvi' needed but missing on your system.
*** Error code 1
Stop in
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 08/01/2011 01:51, Michel Talon wrote:
Doug wrote:
Unfortunately the only way to improve on this would be to not do the
checks on a port-by-port basis, and do them all together at the end.
While that sounds appealing, it would dramatically increase the code
complexity, and also dramatically
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
Hi,
I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today I
realized, that postfix is nolonger in my manualy defined group
(maildirs:*:3125:postfix). I use this setting for many years without
problem.
After the change to use the ports framework to create USERS and GROUPS
it means
Hi,
I have a port which uses tidy while another port uses tidy-lib.
When installing one of these ports gives dependencies problems.
How to solve this problem?
Thanks
Jack Raats
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
- Original Message -
From: Jack Raats j...@jarasoft.netorac# pkgdb -F
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 12:01 PM
Subject: How to solve dependencies problems
Hi,
I have a port which uses tidy while another port uses tidy-lib.
When installing one of these
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:04:38 +0200
Jack Raats articulated:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Raats j...@jarasoft.netorac# pkgdb -F
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 12:01 PM
Subject: How to solve dependencies problems
Hi,
I have a port which uses
Le Monday 01 August 2011, Doug wrote:
A lot of people say that, but I'll stack it up against just about any
interpreted language. Some of my routines are actually faster than the
equivalents in pkg_info (which is why I use them).
Yes, i have seen that portmaster is quite fast. I was
In sec 5.4.2 MASTER_SITES in the porter handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html#AEN1512
the example given is:
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU}
However, sunpoet@ has just committed my patch
changing my
On 01/08/2011 13:45, Jerry wrote:
What I did was install tidy and then install tidy-lib. It seems to
work although it probably should not.
Both of those ports install ${PREFIX}/bin/tidy (as does tidy-devel), so
they should conflict. Which they do: while there isn't a CONFLICTS=
line in
Hello
Even I use portmaster (a very good piece of software),
it becomes very slow when you have 1550 ports installed in your
system.
As only a few ports (about 100, in my case) changes in a week time,
I build a database (postgres) that contains all the ports installed,
de depencies and a flag
I'm trying to build math/R. Compilation went fine, but when I try to
'make install' I get the following error:
ERROR: 'texi2dvi' needed but missing on your system.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/math/R/work/R-2.13.1/doc/manual.
*** Error code 1 (ignored)
cd: can't cd to
On Aug 1, 2011 7:10 AM, Michel Talon ta...@lpthe.jussieu.fr wrote:
[snip]
This being said if an upgrade tool needs to compute (partially) the INDEX,
most of the time is spent in running make -V variables in each port,
because make has to read and interpret enormous files. I don't see any way
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:59:08PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
Hello
Even I use portmaster (a very good piece of software),
it becomes very slow when you have 1550 ports installed in your
system.
As only a few ports (about 100, in my case) changes in a week time,
I build a
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:39:05AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
On Aug 1, 2011 7:10 AM, Michel Talon ta...@lpthe.jussieu.fr wrote:
[snip]
This being said if an upgrade tool needs to compute (partially) the INDEX,
most of the time is spent in running make -V variables in each port,
because
On 2011-08-01 12:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today I
realized, that postfix is nolonger in my manualy defined group
(maildirs:*:3125:postfix). I use this setting for many years without
problem.
After the change to use the
pkg_info -q -O missing/port exits with status of 0.
Not sure if this complies with usual conventions for this kind of tools.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
on 01/08/2011 23:38 Andriy Gapon said the following:
pkg_info -q -O missing/port exits with status of 0.
Not sure if this complies with usual conventions for this kind of tools.
Just a belated subject correction.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2011-08-01 12:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today I
realized, that postfix is nolonger in my manualy defined group
(maildirs:*:3125:postfix). I use this setting for many years without
problem.
After the change
On 08/01/2011 22:38, Andriy Gapon wrote:
pkg_info -q -O missing/port exits with status of 0.
Not sure if this complies with usual conventions for this kind of tools.
No, but the ports tree expect this.
While doing pkgng testing, we discovered that we needed to add a dirty
workaround to
Hello.
After upgrading net-snmp I'm having some trouble, so I tried recompiling
php52-snmp, but it failed.
I think in /usr/ports/lang/php52/Makefile.ext, the line:
LIB_DEPENDS+= netsnmp.20:${PORTSDIR}/net-mgmt/net-snmp
should become:
LIB_DEPENDS+=
On 2011-08-01 22:54, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2011-08-01 12:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today I
realized, that postfix is nolonger in my manualy defined group
(maildirs:*:3125:postfix). I use this setting for
On 2011-08-01 23:31, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2011-08-01 22:54, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2011-08-01 12:55, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today I
realized, that postfix is nolonger in my manualy defined group
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 12:55:33 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi, I upgraded postfix-2.8.3,1 to postfix-2.8.4,1 yesterday and today
I realized, that postfix is nolonger in my manualy defined group
(maildirs:*:3125:postfix). I use this setting for many years without
problem. After the change
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in
the Framework!
From the Framework code in bsd.port.mk existing groups should honored.
Along those lines, what about using groupmod instead of usermod?
Perhaps due to
31 matches
Mail list logo
