## Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu):
checking for dbopen in -ldb4... no
checking for __db185_open in -ldb4... no
configure: error: db not installed or functional
Looks as if you need to install one of databases/db[45]*.
At a quick glance through configure, I guess one of db41, db5, db48 or
Doug Barton wrote on 06.09.2011 04:38:
On 09/05/2011 16:35, wen heping wrote:
Would you send a PR of repocopy to rename these ports?
My understanding is that we don't do port names with . in them. Can
someone who knows more than I confirm one way or the other?
Doug, Mark,
here is my point
On 09/06/2011 00:19, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
we already have plenty of portnames with dot in them
That's not a good reason to add more.
I did read the rest of your post, and while I sympathize with your
arguments, I'm not convinced by them. The good news for you however is
that I'm not in
Doug Barton wrote on 06.09.2011 11:24:
On 09/06/2011 00:19, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
we already have plenty of portnames with dot in them
That's not a good reason to add more.
I did read the rest of your post, and while I sympathize with your
arguments, I'm not convinced by them. The good
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:02:14 +0300
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Second, I personally consider the crusade to remove old but compiling
and working (*) ports as a damage both to the project functionality
and to the project reputation.
I find this whole discussion rather strange.
...
checking which db to use... external
checking for db41/db.h... no
checking for db41/db.h... no
checking for db-5.0/db.h... no
checking for db5.0/db.h... no
checking for db-5/db.h... no
checking for db5/db.h... no
checking for db-4.8/db.h... no
checking for db4.8/db.h... no
checking for
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits/fltk, according to
$ grep fltk /usr/ports/INDEX-9 | cut -d '|' -f 6 | sort | uniq
I'm preparing an update to fltk-1.3.0 and I would like to give you the
chance to test your port against this new version.
If no
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits/fltk, according to
$ grep fltk /usr/ports/INDEX-9 | cut -d '|' -f 6 | sort | uniq
I'm preparing an update to fltk-1.3.0 and I would like to give you the
chance to
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:54:16AM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu):
checking for dbopen in -ldb4... no
checking for __db185_open in -ldb4... no
configure: error: db not installed or functional
Looks as if you need to install one of
On 09/06/2011 06:26 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits/fltk, according to
$ grep fltk /usr/ports/INDEX-9 | cut -d '|' -f 6 | sort | uniq
I'm preparing an update to
Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 06.09.2011 16:09:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:54:16AM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu):
checking for dbopen in -ldb4... no
checking for __db185_open in -ldb4... no
configure: error: db not installed or functional
Looks as
On 2011-Sep-06, 06:26, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits/fltk, according to
$ grep fltk /usr/ports/INDEX-9 | cut -d '|' -f 6 | sort | uniq
I'm preparing an
On 2011-Sep-06, 07:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 06:26 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits/fltk, according to
$ grep fltk
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 06.09.2011 16:30:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote on 06.09.2011 16:09:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:54:16AM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu):
checking for dbopen in -ldb4... no
checking for __db185_open in -ldb4... no
configure:
There seems to be failures the installed version4.4, not sure about that
yet.
I'm pondering to modify the USE_BDB to force 4.4+ but I need more testings
regards,
Bapt
I vote for removing --with-system-db if it adds complexity and be done with it.
The extra time for testing and potential
On 5 September 2011 22:46, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Matthias Andree mand...@freebsd.org wrote:
So either Kostik, or you, or someone else steps up to maintain the port
at least to the extent that the known security bugs and reported bugs
get fixed, or to hell the port goes.
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:51:06PM +0300, George Liaskos wrote:
There seems to be failures the installed version4.4, not sure about that
yet.
I'm pondering to modify the USE_BDB to force 4.4+ but I need more testings
regards,
Bapt
I vote for removing --with-system-db if it adds
On 09/06/2011 07:32 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2011-Sep-06, 07:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 06:26 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits/fltk,
On 2011-Sep-06, 08:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 07:32 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2011-Sep-06, 07:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 06:26 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this
Hello.
Port is at 6.3, but 6.5.1 is out.
Is upgrading under way or planned?
bye Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
checking for dbopen in -ldb4... no
checking for __db185_open in -ldb4... no
configure: error: db not installed or functional
=== Script configure failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to off...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the
Am 05.09.2011 23:43, schrieb Mikhail T.:
On -10.01.-28163 14:59, Doug Barton wrote:
It is not responsible to threaten to remove ports without warning
between releases for non urgent reasons.
We understand that this is your perspective, however the community in
general has a different idea.
Baptiste Daroussin skrev 2011-09-06 17:18:
This should be fixed now, thanks for reporting
Bapt
You're welcome :-)
The upgrade was successful now.
Thanks
/Leslie
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Greetings,
apparently the new /etc/ssl/cert.pem file installed by
security/ca_root_nss trips up the OpenSSL 0.9.8e in the 7.3-RELEASE base
system. I haven't tested 7.4, 8.1 or 8.2, 8-STABLE is unaffected by the
problem.
The symptom is that some certificate chains that validate properly on
Yar Tikhiy yar.tik...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, the Debian folks invested certain effort in
keeping cfs up to date. Their git repo is still available
at http://smarden.org/git/cfs.git/ . In particular, the
DoS fix can be easily obtained from the repo and placed
under files/ in the port.
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Better to deprecate such non urgent ports, wait a while
after next release is rolled, to give release users a warning
some time to volunteer ...
That's an interesting idea, but incredibly unlikely to happen.
It _certainly_ won't happen if
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Yar Tikhiy yar.tik...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, the Debian folks invested certain effort in
keeping cfs up to date. Their git repo is still available
at http://smarden.org/git/cfs.git/ . In particular, the
DoS fix can be
Hi!
As CPPFLAGS support was recently added to ports ([1]) I've proposed to
add support for LDFLAGS as well ([2]). That is quite logical in terms of
consistence, and also may be useful for other purposes such as passing
LTO flags to the linker.
Since many ports set LDFLAGS via CONFIGURE_ENV, e.g.
On 09/07/2011 00:07, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Better to deprecate such non urgent ports, wait a while
after next release is rolled, to give release users a warning
some time to volunteer ...
That's an interesting idea, but incredibly unlikely to
On 07.09.2011 03:09, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
So at this point, all that is needed is for someone interested in
preserving the port -- like maybe you? -- to step up and_do_ that.
The main topic here -- despite the subject line -- is not about the
particular part, but about the
30 matches
Mail list logo
