INDEX build failed for 7.x

2011-09-11 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: rubygem-atoulme-Antwrap-0.7.2: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/rubygem-rjb Committers on the hook: arved cy novel pav rea thierry Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U multimedia/Makefile

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket direct support.

2011-09-11 Thread b. f.
> > ... gzip, for example, has "timestamp" field in header. > > Try this locally, without any [D]VCS: > > > > % mkdir test && echo "one" > test/one.txt && echo "two" > test/two.txt > > % tar czf test1.tar.gz test && sleep 5 && tar czf test2.tar.gz test > > % md5 test1.tar.gz test2.tar.gz > > MD5

INDEX build failed for 7.x

2011-09-11 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: rubygem-atoulme-Antwrap-0.7.2: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/rubygem-rjb Committers on the hook: arved cy pav rea thierry Most recent CVS update was: U games/angband/Makefile U games/angband/distinfo U games/an

print/afm: update for testing

2011-09-11 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Hello; OpenOffice come with a package of 35 Adobe Font Metric files. I think these are useful basically for Windows but not for UNIX: am I correct? I did an update to print/afm so that it uses the OOo file, which is somewhat bigger. I am hesitating if I should submit this as print/afm is used by

Re: Removed ports - looking from the bench

2011-09-11 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:35:47 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: > If archival of old historical distfiles is needed, that's not really > a FreeBSD problem. Start a new project with its own website. Quick, > somebody register deadports.org![4] LOL. Love the name! Wonder if it's already taken.

Re: Removed ports - looking from the bench

2011-09-11 Thread Doug Barton
On 09/11/2011 13:35, Warren Block wrote: > Let me suggest a reasonable[1] plan: No. :) No more talking is necessary. Doing is necessary (or not, doesn't really matter to me at this point). I think Chris is right, a reasonable first step is a Handbook section on "How to recover a port from the CV

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket direct support.

2011-09-11 Thread perryh
Lev Serebryakov wrote: > ... gzip, for example, has "timestamp" field in header. > Try this locally, without any [D]VCS: > > % mkdir test && echo "one" > test/one.txt && echo "two" > test/two.txt > % tar czf test1.tar.gz test && sleep 5 && tar czf test2.tar.gz test > % md5 test1.tar.gz test2.ta

CFT: security/openssh-portable 5.8p2

2011-09-11 Thread Grzegorz Blach
After became a new maintainer of security/openssh-portable, I updated it to 5.8p2 version. My paches fixes several problems repoted to this port: - ports/144597: Kerberos knob work again - ports/150493: Port updated to (almost) recent version - ports/160389: Port build fine on FreeBSD 9.x - ports/1

INDEX build failed for 7.x

2011-09-11 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: rubygem-atoulme-Antwrap-0.7.2: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/rubygem-rjb Committers on the hook: arved pav rea thierry Most recent CVS update was: U devel/Makefile U devel/rubygem-atoulme-antwrap/Makefile U dev

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket direct support.

2011-09-11 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:01:31PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Perryh. > You wrote 11 сентября 2011 г., 10:05:59: > > > I can't address the non-specific "etc", but I would claim that each > > of those 3 specific examples is a VCS bug. Creating a tarball of a > > particular content set

Re: Removed ports - looking from the bench

2011-09-11 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Chris Rees wrote: On 11 September 2011 15:35, Warren Block wrote: On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Greg Byshenk wrote: On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:05:49PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: Why? Because, in the cases here under discussion, there is somethin "wrong" (for some value of 'wro

Re: LDFLAGS support for bsd.port.mk and CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS cleanup

2011-09-11 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote: The patch is ready: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/ldflags.patch While it's mostly a bunch of similar changes, I'd like community eyes on specific important parts, namely Mk/ changes, python and ruby and generally all := assigns of *FLAGS, as these

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket

2011-09-11 Thread C-S
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:52 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 11.09.2011 23:50: > > > > We will see that anyway - when user will try to extract changed > > distfile, he will get warning about incorrect checksum, so this is not > > the case, i believe. > > s/warning/e

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket

2011-09-11 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 11.09.2011 23:50: We will see that anyway - when user will try to extract changed distfile, he will get warning about incorrect checksum, so this is not the case, i believe. s/warning/error/g this error will stops the build. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket

2011-09-11 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
C-S wrote on 11.09.2011 17:23: Sure it worth. From my POV, maintainer should be avoided the pleasure to mess with selfhosted and selfpackaged tarballs as much as possible. Besides of inconvenience it also less reliable (both in availability and security aspects). I'm perfectly happy to mirror a

Re: Removed ports - looking from the bench

2011-09-11 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
Just a case study. I was updating today, turns out print/mgv was deleted, so I switched to print/gv. The end. The current port deletion policy needs no change. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 3

Re: Removed ports - looking from the bench

2011-09-11 Thread Chris Rees
On 11 September 2011 15:35, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Greg Byshenk wrote: >> >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:05:49PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: >>> >>> Why? >> >> Because, in the cases here under discussion, there is somethin "wrong" >> (for some value of 'wrong') with the software i

Re: Removed ports - looking from the bench

2011-09-11 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Greg Byshenk wrote: On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:05:49PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: Why? Because, in the cases here under discussion, there is somethin "wrong" (for some value of 'wrong') with the software in question. I can't speak for Matthias or Chris, but I think the po

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket

2011-09-11 Thread C-S
>Sure it worth. From my POV, maintainer should be avoided the pleasure to > mess with selfhosted and selfpackaged tarballs as much as possible. > Besides of inconvenience it also less reliable (both in availability and > security aspects). > > > I'm perfectly happy to mirror anything if needed,

Re: Removed ports - looking from the bench

2011-09-11 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:05:49PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 10 September 2011 18:15, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 04:45:02PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > > >> > > >> I want to make installing dead ports ha

FreeBSD Port: clamsmtp-1.10_3

2011-09-11 Thread Juergen Dankoweit
Hello clsung, sorry that I don't know your right name, so I used prefix of your email address. I want to tell you that the download address of clamsmtp has changed. It is now http://thewalter.net/stef/software/clamsmtp/clamsmtp-1.10.tar.gz and not http://memberwebs.com/stef/software/clamsmtp/cla

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket direct support.

2011-09-11 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Perryh. You wrote 11 сентября 2011 г., 10:05:59: > I can't address the non-specific "etc", but I would claim that each > of those 3 specific examples is a VCS bug. Creating a tarball of a > particular content set _should_ be a deterministic process: Once again: gzip, for example, has "tim