Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 17.09.2011 10:02:
Janos Dohanics wrote on 17.09.2011 03:57:
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to
mailnews/extensions/smime/build/Makefile.in.rej
By the way, it looks like some stale patch file is a culprit:
This file - patch-mailnews-extensions-smime-build-
Janos Dohanics wrote on 17.09.2011 03:57:
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to
mailnews/extensions/smime/build/Makefile.in.rej
By the way, it looks like some stale patch file is a culprit:
This file - patch-mailnews-extensions-smime-build-Makefile.in in
/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird was
Janos Dohanics wrote on 17.09.2011 03:57:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:20:20 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Hi Janos,
does this bug report still valid? Are you able to reproduce this with
current ports tree and current thunderbird versions in ports (6.0.2
and 3.1.14)?
--
Regards,
Ruslan
Tinder
On 09/15/11 07:06, chukha...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi,
There have been a discussion about finding interdependencies of ports.
I have a relatively simple Python script for that. There is a pr
ports/160007
to add its early version. Unfortunately, I missed a reply to it, so
there is
an issue which I have
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:20:20 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>
> Hi Janos,
>
> does this bug report still valid? Are you able to reproduce this with
> current ports tree and current thunderbird versions in ports (6.0.2
> and 3.1.14)?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ruslan
>
> Tinderboxing kills... the
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Lars Eighner
wrote:
> Just saying.
>
> No really, what to do about the kdelibs4 kdebase4-runtime conflict?
1. can you please write to k...@freebsd.org?
2. can you please actually say something about the problem?
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer
http://people
On 16 Sep 2011 21:16, "Gabor Kovesdan" wrote:
>
> On 2011.09.16. 17:51, Matthias Andree wrote:
>>
>> Am 16.09.2011 11:51, schrieb Lev Serebryakov:
>>>
>>> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
>>> You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 0:28:07:
>>>
> Really? I thought it was supposed to be standard behaviour- the
@st
On 09/16/11 20:00, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> PID_FILE="/var/db/mysql/server.mypc.hu.pid"
> PID=`cat $PID_FILE`
> EXECUTABLE="/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start"
>
> if test -r $PID_FILE ; then
> # pidfile exist, is it correct?
> if kill -CHLD $PID >/dev/null 2>&1; the
Just saying.
No really, what to do about the kdelibs4 kdebase4-runtime conflict?
--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On 2011.09.16. 17:51, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 16.09.2011 11:51, schrieb Lev Serebryakov:
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 0:28:07:
Really? I thought it was supposed to be standard behaviour- the @stopdaemon
line in pkg-plist facilitates that.
While I totally understand w
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Łukasz.
You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 22:17:58:
were not recompiled). Updating ports should never turn off or restart
service - thats my $0.02.
I agree with that. It is not difficult to REstart service by hands.
But stopping service is another story. Many p
W dniu 2011-09-16 20:25, Chris Rees pisze:
> However, having services not restarted after an upgrade can leave you
> with a) a vulnerable older service and b) a nasty shock when you
> decide to reboot six months later and it breaks :)
I know that I should restart service after update and I will d
On 16 September 2011 13:47, Benjamin Stier
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I try to compile packages for older i386 on an amd64 machine. On the amd64 I
> use a chroot into an i386-world. I then compile ports using
> make ARCH=i386 TARGET_ARCH=i386 BATCH=yes install
>
> There are some ports where this
Hello, Łukasz.
You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 22:17:58:
> were not recompiled). Updating ports should never turn off or restart
> service - thats my $0.02.
I agree with that. It is not difficult to REstart service by hands.
But stopping service is another story. Many ports/packages stop
servi
2011/9/16 Łukasz Wąsikowski :
> W dniu 2011-09-16 18:17, Eric pisze:
>
>> Just for ref regarding (c) on the portupgrade wiki page[1] it mentions using
>> AFTERINSTALL in pkgtools.conf for doing automatic stop/start/restart.
>
> I'm using it for a long time on my personal box and it's not that great
W dniu 2011-09-16 18:17, Eric pisze:
> Just for ref regarding (c) on the portupgrade wiki page[1] it mentions using
> AFTERINSTALL in pkgtools.conf for doing automatic stop/start/restart.
I'm using it for a long time on my personal box and it's not that great.
After some updates there is need to
> We do not currently have a standard procedure for that, nor do we record
> the necessary state -- perhaps we should just discuss, vote, and add a
> paragraph to the porter's handbook.
>
> We also need to bring the authors (or volunteers) for the de-facto
> standard upgrade tools into the loop.
>
Yes, the interface needs an IP configured on it, and both boxes need to be
on the same subnet.
However, the "real" IP doesn't have to be a routable IP, nor does it even
have to be in the same subnet as the virtual IP.
The "real" IP is just used for sending out the VRRP broadcasts and pings and
wh
Michel Talon wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >
> > That's what a script of mine does (it's also in Python):
> >
> > http://www.secnetix.de/olli/scripts/pkg_dep_view
>
> Waooh! this is very cute.
>
> While we are in python i have something which draws
> graphviz dependency graphs for
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:27:05 +0200 (CEST), Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote
Hi everyone,
> The port has been updated : Dolphin now builds and run on
> amd64 (the MAP_FIXED hack now works).
A new version of the port is available, following the integration of
several patches into the main branch. I think t
Am 16.09.2011 11:51, schrieb Lev Serebryakov:
> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
> You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 0:28:07:
>
>>> Really? I thought it was supposed to be standard behaviour- the @stopdaemon
>>> line in pkg-plist facilitates that.
>
>> While I totally understand why we do this, I have to say i
Oliver Fromme wrote:
That's what a script of mine does (it's also in Python):
http://www.secnetix.de/olli/scripts/pkg_dep_view
Waooh! this is very cute.
While we are in python i have something which draws
graphviz dependency graphs for ports here
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/pkg_check.py
Hello everyone,
I try to compile packages for older i386 on an amd64 machine. On the amd64 I
use a chroot into an i386-world. I then compile ports using
make ARCH=i386 TARGET_ARCH=i386 BATCH=yes install
There are some ports where this doesn't work. Here's the list I found:
dns/adns
lang/lua
grap
Good day there.
Maintainer timeout 2weeks has reached.
Can please anybody commit this?
http://bugs.freebsd.org/160385
Thanks in advance.
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 02.09.2011 12:18:
Chris Whitehouse wrote on 01.09.2011 02:30:
[skipping the details since original problem was solved]
Now i
Hi,all.
for OLD FreeVRRPd 0.9x,settings example.
--
box1: / etc / rc.conf
ifconfig_em0 = "inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0"
box1: / usr / local / etc / freevrrpd.conf
[VRID]
serverid = 1
interface = em0
carriertimeout = 10
spanningtreelatency = 0
priority = 200
addr = 192.168.0.1/
> Simplicity. [...] I've got ca. 70 Gentoo servers and I want my own
> portage overlay.
Thank you very much for that explanation! I was thinking in a different
direction, as the number of machines I have is quite limited, each
with very specific needs.
As long as it is only about adding new
Hello, Freebsd-ports.
You wrote 16 сентября 2011 г., 0:28:07:
>> Really? I thought it was supposed to be standard behaviour- the @stopdaemon
>> line in pkg-plist facilitates that.
> While I totally understand why we do this, I have to say it's VERY
> VERY annoying behavior especially when one upg
W dniu 2011-09-16 08:24, Klaus T. Aehlig pisze:
> Now I'm really curios what magic device gentoo has. Once thing I
> most appreciate about FreeBSD is how flexible it is in precisely
> this manner.
[...]
> Could you please elaborate, which additional features gentoo's overlay
> system brings on t
Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:06:03AM +0300, chukha...@mail.ru wrote:
> > There have been a discussion about finding interdependencies of ports.
> > I have a relatively simple Python script for that. There is a pr
> > ports/160007
> > to add its early version. Unfortuna
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 02:45 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
> archivers/xz is mark IGNORE because xz is now in the base system (8.2)
>
> Numerous other ports won't build because they believe they depend on xz (or
> on a port that depends on xz)
>
> I'd like to remove the dependencies on xz from the pk
archivers/xz is mark IGNORE because xz is now in the base system (8.2)
Numerous other ports won't build because they believe they depend on xz (or
on a port that depends on xz)
I'd like to remove the dependencies on xz from the pkgs database.
pkgdb -s /xz-5.0.0// won't work as the slash notati
31 matches
Mail list logo
