Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: It should be MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the distfile mirror became the only working master site by default. Please provide a proper master

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/15/2011 11:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: By its nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no PORTREVISION bump happen. portmaster -L will warn you about

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: It should be MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the distfile mirror became the only

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/16/2011 00:27, Chris Rees wrote: On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org mailto:do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: It should be MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg Um, no. That's not an advantage over

can't fetch math/mpfr

2011-11-16 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License LGPL3 accepted by the user = patch02 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//mpfr-3.1.0. = Attempting to fetch http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/patch02 fetch: transfer timed out = Attempting to fetch

SOLVED: Re: can't fetch math/mpfr

2011-11-16 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:43:24AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License LGPL3 accepted by the user = patch02 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//mpfr-3.1.0. = Attempting to fetch

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/11/2011 08:20, Doug Barton wrote: On 11/15/2011 11:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: By its nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no PORTREVISION bump happen.

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-16 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 16/11/2011 10:19 Doug Barton said the following: On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: It should be MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the distfile mirror became the only

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Pav Lucistnik
On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? It is a

10-CURRENT ports/net/wireshark does not compile

2011-11-16 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, /usr/ports is uptodate as of CVS of yesterday, kernel/world are r226986; the above mentioned port does not compile, it gives: # make install ... libtool: compile: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./../.. -I./.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/p11-kit-1 -I/usr/local/

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Glen Barber
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:28:03AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines? Am I misunderstanding something, or is this a local configuration script that customizes the

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:28:03 +0100 Pav Lucistnik articulated: On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [quote http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html] I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where the user-land

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Kurt Jaeger: Hi! Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [quote http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html] I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread olli hauer
On 2011-11-16 10:28, Pav Lucistnik wrote: On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently different to break the

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [...] Postfix does none of that. The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does something which fails on a jail-based build-cluster where the

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Pav Lucistnik
On 2011/11/16 14:18, olli hauer wrote: On 2011-11-16 10:28, Pav Lucistnik wrote: On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Kurt Jaeger: Hi! Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [...] Postfix does none of that. The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does something which fails on a jail-based

science/avogadro compile failure

2011-11-16 Thread David Southwell
avogadro fails with the error reports shown below. Thanks in advance for any guidance David Scanning dependencies of target avogadro-app [ 90%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/editcommands.cpp.o [ 90%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro-

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 Nov 2011 16:00, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Kurt Jaeger: Hi! Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [...] Postfix does none of that. The fbsd postfix-current port during

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 Nov 2011 16:00, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Kurt Jaeger: Hi! Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [...] Postfix does

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse: Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface fixes this, then we can all move on to more interesting things. On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:24

ardour3 beta1 (use a midi keyboard with FreeBSD...)

2011-11-16 Thread Juergen Lock
Hi! I still haven't got around to porting lv2 ui and more plugins (help highly welcome there :) - but after the ardour guys posted a beta1 release of ardour3, http://ardour.org/node/4658 I prepared another port update:

[sysutils/pwsafe] Useless X11 dependency

2011-11-16 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, Pleaese Cc: me when replying, I'm not subscribed. I'm using sysutils/pwsafe on a headless server. My recent upgrade of the port pulled in numerous useless X11 libs. - The port doesn't seem to agree to issue the password on the terminal anymore; - The port compiles cleanly when the

Re: cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-16 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:48:26 +0100 Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with # cd /usr # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs # cvs checkout ports and later do the updating just with: # cd /usr/ports

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:16:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse: Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface fixes this, then we can

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Jase Thew
On 16/11/2011 23:30, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:16:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: [SNIP] It would be immensely helpful if run-time details could be made available including line of source code, and any system configuration details that are necessary to reproduce the

Re: [sysutils/pwsafe] Useless X11 dependency

2011-11-16 Thread Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:47:19PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: Hi, Pleaese Cc: me when replying, I'm not subscribed. I'm using sysutils/pwsafe on a headless server. My recent upgrade of the port pulled in numerous useless X11 libs. - The port doesn't seem to agree to issue the

Re: postfix-current broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/16/2011 05:03, Wietse Venema wrote: I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run, but hey, what do I know. I think you're right that having a network makes the MTA more useful. :) However given the