I just updated my ports tree (csup -L2 ports-supfile) and while I was
building audio/xmixer I got the following unexpected error:
===> Building for xmixer-gtk-0.9.4_6
[snip]
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -std=gnu89 -I/usr/local/include/
-I/usr/local/include -DDEFAULT_MIXER=\"/dev/mixer\" -
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> [Cc to ports@freebsd,org, but please followup at n...@freebsd.org]
>
> anyone interested in taking over maintainership of ports/net/click ?
> We have 1.5.0 in the tree, which is old and partly broken.
Luigi, coming back to an earlier email post
On 25 November 2011 15:06, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Kaya Saman wrote:
>> On 11/25/2011 02:51 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> > Kaya Saman wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm running FreeBSD version 8.0 x64 edition on my server with multiple
>> >> jails.
>> > < Detail deleted>
>> >
>> >> Can an
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, wrote:
> Synopsis: [PATCH] lang/php5: turn on Apache module build by default
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: ale
> State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 25 15:25:31 UTC 2011
> State-Changed-Why:
> Not the right thing, you should build mod_php5 ta
On 11/25/2011 15:25, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, freebsd-ports.
My port shows strange behavior on -CURRENT now: it uses
gnome-libtool, and configure itself with enabled share library. But
on "install" stage it doesn't install shared library at all.
I don't understand all this "FREEBSD10
Hello, freebsd-ports.
My port shows strange behavior on -CURRENT now: it uses
gnome-libtool, and configure itself with enabled share library. But
on "install" stage it doesn't install shared library at all.
I don't understand all this "FREEBSD10 FIX" magic, and don't
understand what goes wro
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Kaya Saman
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:41:26 +0200
> Message-id: <4ecf9b06.1090...@gmail.com>
Kaya Saman wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --080607030603050400060904
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; forma
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:14:40 +0200
Kaya Saman wrote:
> I used the:
>
> portsnap fetch extract upgrade
I assume you mean update rather than upgrade. You don't need to run
extract and update together. You run extract the first time to
extract the full snapshot and then update subsequently. That's
On 11/25/2011 04:05 PM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 11/25/2011 03:44 PM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Marco Beishuizenwrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, the wise Kaya Saman wrote:
Then ran portupgrade -a
for some weird re
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, the wise Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> Then ran portupgrade -a
>>
>> for some weird reason the packages listed below didn't get upgraded; upon
>> the error output 'portupgrade' was trying to replace the port with the same
>>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> On 11/25/2011 03:44 PM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, the wise Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
Then ran portupgrade -a
for some weird reason the packages li
On 11/25/2011 03:44 PM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, the wise Kaya Saman wrote:
Then ran portupgrade -a
for some weird reason the packages listed below didn't get upgraded; upon
the error output 'portupgrade' was trying to
On 11/25/2011 02:51 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD version 8.0 x64 edition on my server with multiple
jails.
< Detail deleted>
Can anyone help with my issues??
8.0 is too old, November 2009
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/
8.0 Is not supported.
http:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, the wise Kaya Saman wrote:
Then ran portupgrade -a
for some weird reason the packages listed below didn't get upgraded;
upon the error output 'portupgrade' was trying to replace the port with
the same version: eg. apache-2.2.13 error came up with the fact that
apache-2.2
Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running FreeBSD version 8.0 x64 edition on my server with multiple
> jails.
< Detail deleted >
> Can anyone help with my issues??
8.0 is too old, November 2009
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/
8.0 Is not supported.
http://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html#
I have noticed a small change in reporting from portupgrade for koffice-kde4.
Current behaviour reports as below even when koffice-kde4 is up to date.
Previously if koffice-kde4 was up to date there was no such report. The
previous behaviour seemed preferable as one only checked to update koffi
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD version 8.0 x64 edition on my server with multiple
jails.
#uname -a
FreeBSD Server 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:02:08
UTC 2009 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
A few weeks back I performed a portupgrade on all
17 matches
Mail list logo
