On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
> needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
> that's fine.
devel/clang a
Feel free to remove www/zope210.
Thanks!
(11/12/04 20:52), Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Good day.
I wrote to you because you are maintainers of zope ports, listed here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope-ports-for-deprecation.html
I'm asking for your approval for this ports deprecation and remo
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:06:19 + (GMT) "Thomas Mueller"
> wrote:
> > > The linux-base port is supposed to provide good integration into
> > > FreeBSD. Ideally the integration is seamless.
> > > The linux-dist ports provide a complete linux environment. You
> > > chroot into it and you ha
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Hi,
The X server has a unix socket somewhere in /tmp. Normally this is used instead
of a TCP connection to the localhost. You need to change the DISPLAY
env-variable to use a TCP connection, or you need o make the unix socket
available to the chrooted linux-env.
The linuxulator in FreeBSD is n
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
> needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
> that's fine.
We d
No, we don't need it that to upgrade llvm, but I need to decide soon.
--
Zhihao Yuan
On Dec 5, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brooks Davis" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> > until we can get this re
Brooks Davis píše v po 05. 12. 2011 v 10:15 -0600:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> > until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
> > needs to stay at its current valu
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So I learned there are actually releases of xbmc pvr already, which
> means nothing should stop us from committing it to ports too? :)
>
> Now I'm wondering if this needs to be repocopied from the xbmc port
> first since it
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:36:47 +0800
Buganini wrote:
> 2011/12/4 Rene Ladan :
> > What about turning it into a bsd..mk target, e.g. :
> > WEBSITE=some-website
> > DISTFILES=same-as-usual
> > MANUAL_DISTFILES=distfile1 distfile2 ...
>
> What if there are multiple sites/path and files?
> Multiple sit
Aric Gregson writes:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:46:52 +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
>> Please, paste a *full* log of the build. The error probably lies before
>> because of make jobs.
>
> Yes, I realized that after and tried to post it but it is too large. I
> have uploaded the full file and it can b
Hi, Gerhard.
Please keep python@ and ports@ in cc:.
Gerhard Schmidt wrote on 12/06/11 10:29:
>
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Betreff: Re: Obsoleted zope ports deprecation
> Datum: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:24:46 +0100
> Von: Gerhard Schmidt
> An: NAKAJI Hiroyuki
>
> (11/12/04 20:52),
12 matches
Mail list logo
