On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Rene Ladan wrote:
> On 24-03-2012 08:04, David Whytcross wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>> am hoping you may be able to assist with an enquiry
>> my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card
>> is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into
>> b
On 03/27/12 21:42, Da Rock wrote:
I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I
keep running into is the previous versions failings... :(
I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting build
errors qa testing(?) sd. I followed the instructions, but it still
Waitman Gobble wrote ..
> Waitman Gobble wrote ..
> > Chris Rees wrote ..
> > > Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@
> > >
> > > On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from
> > > > ht
Waitman Gobble wrote ..
> Chris Rees wrote ..
> > Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@
> >
> > On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from
> > > http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/
thanks for your reply Pav,
I wish I knew how to help with this
I guess CUDA support is being worked on by someone somewhere in the FreeBSD
world, as I see many similar requests to mine on the search engines
hopefully more FreeBSD users can get excited by BOINC projects and help spur
things a
thanks for your reply Rene,
I wish I knew how to help with this
I guess CUDA support is being worked on by someone somewhere in the FreeBSD
world, as I see many similar requests to mine on the search engines
hopefully more FreeBSD users can get excited by SETI and help spur things
along
re
On 03/28/12 18:06, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> So, basically, you do enough pr's, you will bump portrevision and
> someone will complain, and you will skip bumping portrevision and
> someone will complain
Absolutely, b/c we maintain PORTREVISION for pointyhat not the end users
which you blow anyway
Chris Rees wrote ..
> Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@
>
> On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from
> > http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages/Latest/
> > running FreeBSD 10.0-C
On 28 Mar 2012 19:06, "Michael Scheidell" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/28/12 1:06 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>
>> On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped
>>> if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major librar
On 3/28/12 1:06 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped
if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change.
For example, in this case the portmaster program r
On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped
> if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change.
> For example, in this case the portmaster program reinstalls the library
> only, and changes the
testing? ; is this mailing list that I "subscribed" to even accepting my
email ???
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Richard N wrote:
> First off, I would like to thank the author, as listed below, for helping
> making the "gsimplecal" desktop-tool available for installation, for
> FreeBSD.
>
On 03/28/2012 11:13 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
PORTREVISION is historically bumped when you change the resultant
package under the default OPTIONS. Basically if you cause the package
to be rebuilt on pointyhat then you need to bump it.
I was going to say the same thing. But then I thought:
Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@
On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from
> http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages/Latest/
> running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64/SMP
>
> When I start qtcre
First off, I would like to thank the author, as listed below, for helping
making the "gsimplecal" desktop-tool available for installation, for
FreeBSD.
Project home:
http://code.google.com/p/gsimplecal/
https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal
Downloads:
https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal/
PORTREVISION is historically bumped when you change the resultant
package under the default OPTIONS. Basically if you cause the package
to be rebuilt on pointyhat then you need to bump it.
On 03/28/12 15:57, Jason Helfman wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/28/12 11:39 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> You also need t
>
>
> On 3/28/12 11:39 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> You also need to consider that packages are rebuilt on a bump, so if
>> the RUN_DEPEND removal were a real monster, the pkg_add -r users will
>> thank you for that.
> Im guessing perl would qualify for that :-).. needs perl to build, but
> not run.
>
On 3/28/12 11:39 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
You also need to consider that packages are rebuilt on a bump, so if
the RUN_DEPEND removal were a real monster, the pkg_add -r users will
thank you for that.
Im guessing perl would qualify for that :-).. needs perl to build, but
not run.
python, bison
On 28 Mar 2012 16:22, "Michael Scheidell" wrote:
>
> Looking for an FAQ on PORTREVISION bumps on commits, pr's.
>
> Basically, I make the decision based on 'hey, if I was running a cronjob
to do a portupgrade -Rr every night, would I want this to be upgraded'?
>
> I know if something is broken acr
Looking for an FAQ on PORTREVISION bumps on commits, pr's.
Basically, I make the decision based on 'hey, if I was running a cronjob
to do a portupgrade -Rr every night, would I want this to be upgraded'?
I know if something is broken across all builds, it doesn't need a
portrevision bump.
If
Not trying to piss everyone off here with all these build failures I'm
throwing in :) Can I get a confirmation on this one though?
I was installing xscreensaver and this came port up as a failed build
due to missing file. Due to a break in convention I had to edit
/usr/ports/x11/fireflies/work
On 03/28/12 01:12, R Skinner wrote:
I'm trying to build openjdk6 but it is failing as well. Can someone
confirm if I'm seeing gmake[x] if this is running as parallel jobs?
I'm running every invocation I can find to prevent it
(MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=true, DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS, env settings), but it
ins
22 matches
Mail list logo
