Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ?
doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should
be in ../lang.
cat pkg-descr
Ur is a programming language in the tradition of ML and Haskell, but
featuring
a significantly richer type system. Ur is functional, pure,
On 05/04/12 10:41 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ?
doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should
be in ../lang.
cat pkg-descr
Ur is a programming language in the tradition of ML and Haskell, but
featuring
a
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:41:21AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ?
doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should
be in ../lang.
cat pkg-descr
Ur is a programming language in the tradition of ML and Haskell,
* Michael Scheidell (scheid...@freebsd.org) wrote:
Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ?
doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should
be in ../lang.
Yes, lang/ seems to be more suitable.
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A
On 3/30/12 4:35 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
o When pkg-plist changes (except for fixing
.ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES))
#1 covers this, this is the OPTIONS case (default vs not)
perfect example, real world.
pr hasn't been submitted yet.
In short what you change is irrelevant.
On 04/05/12 20:04, Michael Scheidell wrote:
on this one, I did. And was told by crees that I didn't need to wrap
PORTDOCS= around an ifdef.
So, 2 programmers, 2 opinions. Thank God I didn't ask in ports@.
Of the 2 of them one is right. At least as it is currently documented.
# PORTDOCS
On 04/05/12 20:04, Michael Scheidell wrote:
But from a users perspective, why do through the problems of rebuilding
a port, (bringing in updated dependencies, conflicts regression
testing), just to delete 100K from his ../share directory?
Thats a larger argument.
pav@ would ask why do we both
On 4/5/2012 22:21, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 04/05/12 20:04, Michael Scheidell wrote:
on this one, I did. And was told by crees that I didn't need to wrap
PORTDOCS= around an ifdef.
So, 2 programmers, 2 opinions. Thank God I didn't ask in ports@.
Of the 2 of them one is right. At least
Building samba 3.6, 3.5, 3.4... noticed a missing dependency during
build on net/libnet. Maybe need to add this to the port?
Cheers
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
Hi!
Can you show the build output? Port should't directly dipend from
anything like this.
Cheers.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Da Rock
freebsd-po...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
Building samba 3.6, 3.5, 3.4... noticed a missing dependency during build on
net/libnet. Maybe need to add
10 matches
Mail list logo