Re: Emacs?

2012-06-16 Thread Heino Tiedemann
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote: > Heino Tiedemann writes: >> emacs 24 final is out > >> There isn't an emacs 24 final in editors/emacs neither in >> editors/emacs-devel > > >> is there someone working on that? > > Hi Heino, > > I'm the maintainer of editos/emacs*, and I'm working on it.

Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing!

2012-06-16 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Martin Wilke wrote on 07.06.2012 16:37: Hi Fans, The FreeBSD Xorg Team is pleased to announce Xorg 7.7 Release. We are Just finished the upgrade on yesterday's -current amd64 with (WITH_NEW_XORG and WITH_KMS) along with png15 update. Upgrade goes smoothly and everything works fine to me. I a

Nginx SPDY support patch

2012-06-16 Thread Sevan / Venture37
Hi This patch adds an option to build nginx-devel with the recently announced spdy patch, it alse cleans up some errors flagged by portlint which allows "port test" to build this port http://pastebin.com/hfhjhukQ Sevan / Venture37 ___ freebsd-ports@

Re: Skype 4.0

2012-06-16 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:11:03 -0400 Rich Neese wrote: > On 6/15/2012 5:08 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > >> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > >> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > >>

Re: Skype 4.0

2012-06-16 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:02:43 -0700 (PDT) "Waitman Gobble" wrote: > dude like since MS bought it they haven't even released any non-win32 > version. i agree, a different alternative to skype is better, and get > your contacts to join up with that. If you don't count Mac, Android, and some other .

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2012-06-16 22:36, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 20:11, Olli Hauer wrote: >> With one RPM spec file you can build foo, foo-docs, foo-devlibs and >> foo-examples in one build and get 4 rpm's in one run. >> >> With the ports infrastructure we have to run several builds >> one for foo, one

Re: Emacs?

2012-06-16 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Heino Tiedemann writes: > Hi, > emacs 24 final is out > There isn't an emacs 24 final in editors/emacs neither in > editors/emacs-devel > is there someone working on that? Hi Heino, I'm the maintainer of editos/emacs*, and I'm working on it. It'll take a bit of time, because it'll require a

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/06/2012 20:11, Olli Hauer wrote: > With one RPM spec file you can build foo, foo-docs, foo-devlibs and > foo-examples in one build and get 4 rpm's in one run. > > With the ports infrastructure we have to run several builds > one for foo, one for foo-devlibs and maybe one for foo-docs if doc

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2012-06-16 17:49, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain >> name. > > That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create > sub-packages. As I understand it, you'

Re: kde 4.8.4

2012-06-16 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
"Edwin L. Culp W." writes: > It broke at : > > 73%] Building CXX object > kopete/protocols/jabber/googletalk/libjingle/talk/examples/call/CMakeFiles/call.dir/console.o^Jcd > /usr/ports/net/kdenetwork4/ > > /usr/local/lib/libmediastreamer.so: undefined reference to > `snd_pcm_hw_params@ALSA_0.9' >

Re: How to uninstall pkgng

2012-06-16 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:26:59PM +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:56:56 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote: > > > On 6/9/2012 7:46 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > >> I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is > >> no up-to-date repository I want to remove

Re: How to uninstall pkgng

2012-06-16 Thread Marcin Wisnicki
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:56:56 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote: > On 6/9/2012 7:46 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: >> I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is >> no up-to-date repository I want to remove it. > Have you looked at http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/freebsd-9-amd64/latest

Re: kde 4.8.4

2012-06-16 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
2012/6/16 Raphael Kubo da Costa > Mel Flynn writes: > > > Please retry as make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS build. > > That will show us the real error. > > And please have CMAKE_VERBOSE set so we can see the full command line of > the call that's causing problems. > > ___

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:49:22PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain > > name. > > That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create > sub-packages. A

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain > name. That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create sub-packages. As I understand it, you'll be building and installing each port into a stagin

Re: Building gimp-2.8

2012-06-16 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Heino Tiedemann wrote on 22.05.2012 23:56: >> ajtiM wrote: >> >>> On Monday 07 May 2012 06:56:00 Matthieu Volat wrote: Hello everybody, As gimp 2.8 was released a few days ago, I naturaly tried to get it working on my 9.0-RELEASE desktop :) >

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:11:25PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:06:36PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: > > On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: > >

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:06:36PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: > >>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't > >

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/06/2012 15:26, Chris Rees wrote: > On 16 June 2012 15:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: >>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't >>> we just add the category to it? >>> >>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} >>> UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat}

Re: kde 4.8.4

2012-06-16 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Mel Flynn writes: > Please retry as make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS build. > That will show us the real error. And please have CMAKE_VERBOSE set so we can see the full command line of the call that's causing problems. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing li

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Mel Flynn
On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: >>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't >>> we just add the category to it? >>> >>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES}

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: > > That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't > > we just add the category to it? > > > > .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} > > UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat} > > .endfor > > > > (

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Mel Flynn
On 16-6-2012 15:18, Chris Rees wrote: > On 13 June 2012 16:21, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a >> unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus >> how it causes various problems with OPTIONS pr

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 June 2012 15:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: >> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't >> we just add the category to it? >> >> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} >> UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat} >> .endfor >> >> (copying the code from PKGCAT

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: > That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't > we just add the category to it? > > .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} > UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat} > .endfor > > (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the > PKGCATEGORY co

Re: kde 4.8.4

2012-06-16 Thread Mel Flynn
On 16-6-2012 15:30, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: > I've upgraded all kde4 to kde4.8.4 except for kdenetwork. It breaks as > shown below but I have no idea where to begin to look to try and fix it. > > > [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/urlchecker.o > [ 12%] Building CXX ob

Re: p5-Locale-gettext fails

2012-06-16 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > What's wrong with devel/p5-Locale-gettext all of a sudden? Please ignore, this was a local problem. Turned out the the SSD was starting to corrupt files. Luckily I got a backup off the drive in time, and the SSSD was fixed by upgrading

kde 4.8.4

2012-06-16 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
I've upgraded all kde4 to kde4.8.4 except for kdenetwork. It breaks as shown below but I have no idea where to begin to look to try and fix it. [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/urlchecker.o [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/settings.o [ 12%] Buil

Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches

2012-06-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 13 June 2012 16:21, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Dear all, > > After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a > unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus > how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having a > proper UNIQUENAME

Re: FreeBSD not so free anymore ? Long live FreeBSD...

2012-06-16 Thread Matt Dawson
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:00:47 + (UTC) Jerry wrote: > So, are you implying that ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture) > is never going to happen on a FreeBSD system? Our OSS sound subsystem works (and allows multiple access) without twenty different sound servers, mixers, shim layers and mu

kmail since upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread David Southwell ARPS
Hi I followed UPDATING instructions and deleted -r /akonadi immediately before running portupgrade -a which resulted in an upgrade to kde4 8.4. Now I seem to have a problem with kmail which when launched gives: Error kmail kmail encountered a fatal error and will terminate now. The err

Re: Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE

2012-06-16 Thread Johan van Selst
Hi Julian, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on > cd print/texinfo ; make fetch > unless one imports newer values from current, I copied the versions used by this port to my own server to prevent this failure, specificially for the case that the primary sources updates the

Emacs?

2012-06-16 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Hi, emacs 24 final is out There isn't an emacs 24 final in editors/emacs neither in editors/emacs-devel is there someone working on that? Heino ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To u

Re: FreeBSD not so free anymore ? Long live FreeBSD...

2012-06-16 Thread Chris Rees
On Jun 15, 2012 10:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:12:58 +0100 > Chris Rees articulated: > > >On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard wrote: > >> On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > >>> > >>> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > >>> getting it p

Re: Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE

2012-06-16 Thread b. f.
> Hi johans at FreeBSD.org > & cc ports@ > A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on > cd print/texinfo ; make fetch > unless one imports newer values from current, ... > So how best to modify Makefile to not break on size & sha256 of > some but not all files ? > > The question can't be unique to this