On 18 Jul 2012 07:44, "John Marino" wrote:
>
> On 7/18/2012 00:43, Mark Linimon wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09:50AM +0200, John Marino wrote:
>>>
>>> Would it be so bad if all my submitted patches (as a recognized
>>> quality contributor with history) just got committed as a passthroug
On 7/18/2012 12:19, Chris Rees wrote:
On 18 Jul 2012 07:44, "John Marino" wrote:
Yes, somebody would have to set that up but it would pay big dividend I
think.
It also does away with the QA aspect that committers currently provide.
I'd like to repeat that people sufficiently familiar with the
On 18 Jul 2012 11:33, "John Marino" wrote:
>
> On 7/18/2012 12:19, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Jul 2012 07:44, "John Marino" wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, somebody would have to set that up but it would pay big dividend I
>>
>> think.
>>
>> It also does away with the QA aspect that committers currently p
I got this on one of my machines (9.0-RELEASE):
=> bsdadminscripts-6.1.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/bsdadminscripts/bsdadminscripts/bsdadminscripts-6.1.1.tar.gz
bsdadminscripts-6.1.1.tar.gz
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 18.07.2012 14:48:
As you see variables are not expanded. Have no problems with other ports
on the same system. Have no problem with this port on other machines.
What to look for? Thanks.
Ok, answering to myself. It was because of
NOPORTDOCS=yes
NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes
On 7/18/2012 12:40, Chris Rees wrote:
You are making a good point, but I'm trying to explain that the 'body of
work' for proposing a new developer is no greater than the standard you
suggest.
We do have developers who only commit to their own ports; while it's
generally hoped that they work on
Hello.
I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure
to fix the problem does not work for me.
Please see below.
Thanks
tail_build deliver
Module 'tail_build' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 0 files
unchanged
-
Leslie Jensen writes:
> I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure
> to fix the problem does not work for me.
What version of clang do you have installed?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
I was forced to deinstall clang 3.1 because Libre office wanted to install
devel-clang 3.2
Lowell Gilbert skrev:Leslie Jensen
writes:
> I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure
> to fix the problem does not work for me.
What version of clang do you have insta
On a system running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5 gets stuck at:
=
(1/1) Building module sal
=
Entering
/data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-18 10:57:58 -0400, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> I was forced to deinstall clang 3.1 because Libre office wanted to
> install devel-clang 3.2
I found that it does not build with clang-devel, yet. :-(
It is not clang's fault actually and I am work
Jung-uk Kim writes:
> It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please
> stay tuned.
One issue is that different problems have been presenting with very
similar symptoms, so that it's hard to help people who need technical
assistance. I don't see anything we can do about that,
On 18 Jul 2012 12:55, "Leslie Jensen" wrote:
>
>
> Hello.
>
> I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure to
fix the problem does not work for me.
>
> Please see below.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> tail_build deliver
> Module 'tail_build' delivered successfully. 0 files co
The ports version of dns/fpdns seems to have this[1] bug:
$ fpdns ns1.isc-sns.net.
Net::DNS::Header::data: no such method at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.16.0/Net/DNS/Fingerprint.pm line 668.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830449
--
Greg Rivers
___
On 07/18/2012 08:46, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> On a system running:
>
> FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
>
> and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5
Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you sure your world is
current enough to get the latest c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Jung-uk Kim writes:
>
>> It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix.
>> Please stay tuned.
>
> One issue is that different problems have been presenting with
> very similar sympto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something
interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++ compilers may
have different __cplusplus definitions and it may cause some
strangeness. Clang, for example, used to set it to 1 b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-18 18:21:53 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Jung-uk Kim writes:
>
>>> It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix.
>>> Please stay tuned.
>
>> One issue is that different
Doug Barton writes:
> >On a system running:
> >
> > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
> >
> >and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5
>
> Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you sure your
> world is current enough to get the latest clan
On 19 Jul 2012 01:09, "Robert Huff" wrote:
>
>
> Doug Barton writes:
>
> > >On a system running:
> > >
> > > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64
> > >
> > >and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5
> >
> > Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you s
20 matches
Mail list logo
