Re: mutt 1.5 much slower than mutt 1.4

2012-07-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:51:57AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:18:43PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64 -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4 to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to act. Below is my

Re: mutt 1.5 much slower than mutt 1.4

2012-07-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:00:39PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 24.07.2012 19:18, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht: mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64 -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4 to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to act. Below is my mutt 1.5 config: ...

Re: mutt 1.5 much slower than mutt 1.4

2012-07-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:00:39PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 24.07.2012 19:18, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht: mail/mutt is much slower on my amd64 and ia64 -current boxes after it was updated from 1.4 to 1.5. Each keystroke takes few seconds to act. Below is my mutt 1.5 config: ...

Re: CFT: New mplayer / mencoder snapshot

2012-07-25 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Thomas Zander: New tarball is available for download: http://bsdistfiles.googlecode.com/files/m20120724.tar.bz2 Using the default options, this mplayer works on 7.4-STABLE/amd64 for all my media. No regressions. (And lavcac3enc is still broken. No improvement there either.) I don't use

fetchmail can't find python?

2012-07-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
While rebuilding fetchmail again, I noticed this line in configure logs: configure: WARNING: Disabling fetchmailconf: python 2.0 or greater not found I've got python all right: # pkg info -xo python python27-2.7.3_3: lang/python27 # So what does this mean? In case it matters, this is on #

Re: fetchmail can't find python?

2012-07-25 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:40:50 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht articulated: While rebuilding fetchmail again, I noticed this line in configure logs: configure: WARNING: Disabling fetchmailconf: python 2.0 or greater not found I've got python all right: # pkg info -xo python python27-2.7.3_3:

Re: Cannot upgrade kde-baseapps-4.7.4_1 to 4.8.4

2012-07-25 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
sindrome sindr...@gmail.com writes: Linking CXX executable dolphin ../../lib/libdolphinprivate.so.5.0.1: undefined reference to `KVersionControlPlugin2::staticMetaObject' For posterity: we've also been contacted in the kde@ mailing list [1], and are currently tracking it there. It may be the

Re: Cannot upgrade kdesdk-4.7.4_1 to 4.8.4

2012-07-25 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
sindrome sindr...@gmail.com writes: Trying to upgrade kdesdk-4.7.4_1 to 4.8.4 and running into the following error. Anyone have an idea? This seems to come from the same libkonq problems which are currently blocking your kde4-baseapps upgrade. ___

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

2012-07-25 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes: Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. It seems to be running fine here, I've now even switched to GTK3 (I wonder if there should be an error message if one selected more than one GUI option). Gnus from git with the new Emacs also seems to be

Re: fetchmail can't find python?

2012-07-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:40:50 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht articulated: While rebuilding fetchmail again, I noticed this line in configure logs: =20 configure: WARNING: Disabling fetchmailconf: python 2.0 or greater not found =20

Re: fetchmail can't find python?

2012-07-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: [CFT] editors/emacs to 24.1

2012-07-25 Thread Jason E. Hale
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:39:07 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: It seems to be running fine here, I've now even switched to GTK3 (I wonder if there should be an error message if one selected more than one GUI option). The GUI options use OPTIONS_SINGLE, so the port will error out if more

Re: fetchmail can't find python?

2012-07-25 Thread Corey Halpin
It's harmless; just the fetchmail port working around the configure script so that the proper PYTHON_VERSION is pulled in, rather than whatever the configure script finds. If you've got the 'x11' option enabled for the port, fetchmailconf will be built and installed regardless of that

Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
Hi, What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on the command line or within a script? For example, I have a script that builds both dynamic and static zsh binaries, without user intervention. With the old options system, the script set WITH_ZSH_STATIC=true when building the port.

FreeBSD Port: bash-4.2.28

2012-07-25 Thread Michael
Hello obrien, Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037? I see we still are on patch level 028. Regards, Michael Zoon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: Hi, What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on the command line or within a script? For example, I have a script that builds both dynamic and static zsh binaries, without user intervention. With the old

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on the command line or within a script? For example, I have a script that builds both dynamic and static zsh binaries,

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:09:48PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on the command line or within a script? I also tried the

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:09:48PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on the

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote: Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:11:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: What is the proper way to temporarily change an option on the command line or within a script?

Re: FreeBSD Port: bash-4.2.28

2012-07-25 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote: Hello obrien, Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037? Is there a specific bug fixed that you're interested in? -- Change is hard. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote: I also tried the other settings you suggested, and none of them works. It's always overridden by the settings that are stored in $PORT_DBDIR. With the old framework, I

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote: The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and command params have priority. (Place the make.conf part after the OPTIONS_FILE_SET part) Until now I cannot

Re: fetchmail can't find python?

2012-07-25 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:55:28 +0100 (BST) Anton Shterenlikht articulated: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:40:50 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht articulated: While rebuilding fetchmail again, I noticed this line in configure logs: =20 configure: WARNING: Disabling fetchmailconf: python 2.0 or greater not

Re: FreeBSD Port: bash-4.2.28

2012-07-25 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:14:25 -0700 Doug Barton articulated: On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote: Hello obrien, Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037? Is there a specific bug fixed that you're interested in? The short answer would be what the hell difference does that

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote: The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and command params have priority. (Place the

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2012-07-26 00:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote: The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and

Re: [RFC] LibreOffice build issues

2012-07-25 Thread Jung-uk Kim
FreeBSD version? Was it stable/9? FYI, I wasn't able to build it sanely on head. :-( It's the head: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r236503. I guess you had installed OpenSSL from ports. ;-) Now I am able to build it with GCC 4.6: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/libreoffice-20120725.tar.bz2 Basically

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Eitan Adler
On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote: The following diff will restore the old

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:40:56PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Eitan Adler
On 25 July 2012 21:55, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: You can already do that: OPTIONSFILE=/my/path/to/options make config You can't set specific options on the command line without putting all of them into a file? -- Eitan Adler ___

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2012-07-26 06:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:40:56PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Wed, Jul 25,

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 07:22:24AM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: On 2012-07-26 06:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:40:56PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer