Hello,
there is a native python binding for Firebird database:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/fdb-0.9.1.tgz
It is based on ports/172455 by Jose Jachuf. It builds just fine in
tinderbox both with python2 and python3 but fails to build on a live
system. The difference is that firebird25-client's
On 10/8/2012 8:30 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
>> target
>> becomes impossible:
>>
>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
>> part
>> is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOM
on 08/10/2012 18:51 Oliver Heesakkers said the following:
> Op ma 08 okt 2012 18:30:12 schreef Andriy Gapon:
>> Not sure if my environment is messed up or if it is OK, but i have both lcms
>> and lcms2 installed, and there is a bunch of packages that depend on them.
>> I've been using pkgng for a w
Am 10/08/12 17:48, schrieb Борис Самородов:
> 08.10.2012 18:58, Max Khon пишет:
>
>> However I still fail to see what is wrong with this "make -f"
>> invocation (why it complains on unknown "-" parameter). Also, it does
>> not fail with this error message for me on FreeBSD 9.1.
>
> Seems that the
Op ma 08 okt 2012 18:30:12 schreef Andriy Gapon:
> Not sure if my environment is messed up or if it is OK, but i have both lcms
> and lcms2 installed, and there is a bunch of packages that depend on them.
> I've been using pkgng for a while now and it never complained about these
> packages, but no
08.10.2012 18:58, Max Khon пишет:
However I still fail to see what is wrong with this "make -f"
invocation (why it complains on unknown "-" parameter). Also, it does
not fail with this error message for me on FreeBSD 9.1.
Seems that the port is _not_ multiple jobs safe. Just changing
MAKE_JOBS
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Not sure if my environment is messed up or if it is OK, but i have both lcms
> and
> lcms2 installed, and there is a bunch of packages that depend on them.
> I've been using pkgng for a while now and it never complained about these
> package
Not sure if my environment is messed up or if it is OK, but i have both lcms and
lcms2 installed, and there is a bunch of packages that depend on them.
I've been using pkgng for a while now and it never complained about these
packages, but now it produces the following error:
Installing lcms2-2.4
Am 10/08/12 16:58, schrieb Max Khon:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Борис Самородов wrote:
>
>> (the port maintainer is CCed)
>>
>> 08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
>>
>>> Has anyone any idea what is happening and how to solve? Where to look?
>>
>>
>> I've found it out.
>>
>> W
Hello!
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Борис Самородов wrote:
> (the port maintainer is CCed)
>
> 08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
>
>> Has anyone any idea what is happening and how to solve? Where to look?
>
>
> I've found it out.
>
> When py27-sphinx is installed the databases/pgadmin3 aut
On 10/08/12 15:13, Борис Самородов wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> (the port maintainer is CCed)
>
> 08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
>
>> Has anyone any idea what is happening and how to solve? Where to look?
>
> I've found it out.
>
> When py27-sphinx is installed the databases/pgadmin3 autodetects
Hi!
> If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
> target
> becomes impossible:
>
> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
> part
> is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk?
See
http://www.f
Hi All,
(the port maintainer is CCed)
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
Has anyone any idea what is happening and how to solve? Where to look?
I've found it out.
When py27-sphinx is installed the databases/pgadmin3 autodetects it
and try to build documentation. From the WRKSRC/Makefile:
If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
target
becomes impossible:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
part
is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk?
--
Andriy Gapon
_
08.10.2012 16:13, Борис Самородов пишет:
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
===> Building for pgadmin3-1.16.0
cd ./docs/en_US && make -f Makefile.sphinx
SPHINXBUILD=/usr/local/bin/sphinx-build htmlhelp
make: illegal option -- -
usage: make [-BPSXeiknpqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable]
08.10.2012 15:41, O. Hartmann пишет:
===> Building for pgadmin3-1.16.0
cd ./docs/en_US && make -f Makefile.sphinx
SPHINXBUILD=/usr/local/bin/sphinx-build htmlhelp
make: illegal option -- -
usage: make [-BPSXeiknpqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable]
[-d flags] [-E variable] [-f makefile]
I see the below shown error on only one of my FreeBSD boxes driven by
either FreeBSD 9.1-PRE or FreeBSD 10.0-CUR, all amd64 and CLANG built.
Since all FreeBSD 10.0-CUR boxes build the update of that specific port
without complains, I guess there is a nasty hidden little bug in one of
my config file
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
On 8 Oct 2012 10:16, "Chris Rees" wrote:
>
>
> On 8 Oct 2012 09:38, "Thomas Mueller" wrote:
> >
> > from Polytropon:
> >
> > > A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
> > > to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
> >
> > > # make config-recursive
>
On 8 Oct 2012 09:38, "Thomas Mueller" wrote:
>
> from Polytropon:
>
> > A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
> > to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
>
> > # make config-recursive
>
> > Once set, the options won't be requested on a second run.
from Polytropon:
> A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
> to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
> # make config-recursive
> Once set, the options won't be requested on a second run.
> According to "man 7 ports", there's a BATCH setting, but
>
To read the text in Spanish and take advantage our interactive format, we
recommend reading our e-mails in format "HTML".
We host our documents on the secure server Skydrive; We are natural persons in
a private market, for this motive we use communication no corporate. We
appreciate your confid
23 matches
Mail list logo
