Hi, vanilla!
I installed the port lang/v8 but found the d8 binary was not installed.
Is there any reason for that? Would you please make d8 binary as an option?
--
B.R.
HU Dong
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Is there a conflict between lang/tcl85 and x11-toolkits/open-motif, not
documented in the Makefiles, like trying to install files to the same place?
Trying in many steps, stopped by so many snags, I am trying to rebuild all
ports depending on png, starting from portmaster -r png-, and this is
Here I am again, with the third port I cannot build in a week :)
# uname -a
FreeBSD .x 8.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 #1: Sat Jun 16
17:36:51 CEST 2012 root@.x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ i386
# make
=== Found saved configuration for flyspray-0.9.9.7
=== Extracting
The issue seems to be that the file is in dos format, and the patch isn't.
Attached is a patch file with all the ^M s in place.
I'll leave how to fix the port to someone else, simply because I do
not know how it is done.
On 23 October 2012 19:12, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote:
Here
On 23/10/2012 10:12, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to includes/fix.inc.php.rej
= Patch patch-includes-fix.inc.php failed to apply cleanly.
*** Error code 1
Damn, the patch submission process turned all the CRLFs into LFs. Here's a
new patch. I'll submit it
On 2012-Oct-23, 05:02, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Is there a conflict between lang/tcl85 and x11-toolkits/open-motif, not
documented in the Makefiles, like trying to install files to the same place?
Trying in many steps, stopped by so many snags, I am trying to rebuild all
ports depending on
On 23/10/2012 10:27, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Damn, the patch submission process turned all the CRLFs into LFs. Here's a
new patch. I'll submit it to GNATS.
ports/172976
Nick
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
This can be fixed by using either the mentioned or if you require the tcl
man pages add:
WITHOUT_OPENMOTIF_MANUALS=yes to make.conf and rebuild open-motif.
Chris
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2012-Oct-23, 05:02, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Is there a
There is a thread this week at the FreeBSD forums, pkgng: pkg upgrade in
which is posted some concerns about maybe not enough documentation prior to pkg
being the default package manager. Someone involved in its development wish to
address those in code or to the forum/list?
...
Also, I am