Gramps 3.3.0 Final Report

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
Sent to the maintainer and to the ports list because of a complaint that the maintainer isn't listening to the developers. I encountered a bug[0] that caused GRAMPS to crash. I filed a bug report with the developers as the port built just fine. I got a quick response (surprisingly) and was pointed

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 11:55, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Oct-31, 11:28, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> New diff[0], undoing some of the earlier changes even though portlint >> complains: >> >> portlint ~/port-maintenance/tk85/ >> WARN: Makefile: unless this is a master port, COMMENT has to be set by >> "=",

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 11:28, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 10/31/12 10:39, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > >> patch < tk85.diff > > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -- > > |--- Makefile.orig 2012-10-26 19:47:37.0 -0500 > >

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 10:39, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> patch < tk85.diff > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -- > |--- Makefile.orig 2012-10-26 19:47:37.0 -0500 > |+++ Makefile 2012-10-29 20:16:13.0 -0500 >

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 10:39, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> patch < tk85.diff > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -- > |--- Makefile.orig 2012-10-26 19:47:37.0 -0500 > |+++ Makefile 2012-10-29 20:16:13.0 -0500 >

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 15:25, Chris Rees wrote: > On 31 Oct 2012 15:21, "Pietro Cerutti" wrote: > > > > On 2012-Oct-31, 09:14, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > > On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > > > >> > > > >> I'd like to volun

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Chris Rees
On 31 Oct 2012 15:21, "Pietro Cerutti" wrote: > > On 2012-Oct-31, 09:14, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > > >>

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 09:14, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a >> working update to it. All changes were due to fe

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 08:49, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > Please be informed that I have in the pipeline some work on Tcl/Tk ports, > including removal of the -thread slaves. Okay > Having said that, I don't have any major concerns about you taking > maintainership of tk85, apart from the technical details poi

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a >> working update to it. All changes were due to fe

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a > working update to it. All changes were due to feedback from portlint. > Any and all feedback wo

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 08:36, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 10/31/12 08:24, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 31 October 2012 13:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 08:24, Chris Rees wrote: > On 31 October 2012 13:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a >> working update to it. All changes were due to fe

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Chris Rees
On 31 October 2012 13:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a > working update to it. All changes were due to feedback from portlint. > Any and all feedback

tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
Hi All, I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a working update to it. All changes were due to feedback from portlint. Any and all feedback would be appreciated. [0]: http://pastebin.com/6DuzdAzv --

Re: pkgclean target? by analogy with distclean

2012-10-31 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
--- On Wed, 10/31/12, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From: Anton Shterenlikht > Subject: pkgclean target? by analogy with distclean > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2012, 3:38 AM > Is there a target similar to > distclean > that removes the package and the symlinks f

Re: pkgclean target? by analogy with distclean

2012-10-31 Thread Chris Rees
On 31 October 2012 10:38, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Is there a target similar to distclean > that removes the package and the symlinks from > ${PORTSDIR}/packages? > If not, is it worthwhile making it? > Something like pkgclean, or maybe > rmpackage, similar to "make package". bsd.port.mk, line

interesting bug in multimedia/recordmydesktop port

2012-10-31 Thread gabor
Hi! Today I tried the recordmydesktop package / port on FreeBSD. It was a bit disappointing, that on FreeBSD jack is a forced dependency of it. But it was a bigger surprise, that the command $ recordmydesktop --print-config recordMyDesktop was compiled with the following options: Jack

pkgclean target? by analogy with distclean

2012-10-31 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
Is there a target similar to distclean that removes the package and the symlinks from ${PORTSDIR}/packages? If not, is it worthwhile making it? Something like pkgclean, or maybe rmpackage, similar to "make package". Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma

Re: [Call for Testers] VirtualBox 4.2.4

2012-10-31 Thread Olivier Smedts
Hello, 2012/10/30 Bernhard Fröhlich : > This is again a call for testers to get some feedback before we commit > VirtualBox 4.2 to the portstree. Better Windows 8 support : check. My other VMs still work as before. Thanks for your work ! -- Olivier Smedts

Re: [Call for Testers] VirtualBox 4.2.4

2012-10-31 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On 2012-10-30 08:07 PM, Jason Andresen wrote: >> >> On Oct 30, 2012, at 15:56, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: >> >>> Clang does not support global registered variables so it's not supposed >>> to >>> work. >> >> >> Is this a feature? Is there a re

Re: [Call for Testers] VirtualBox 4.2.4

2012-10-31 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 2012-10-30 08:07 PM, Jason Andresen wrote: On Oct 30, 2012, at 15:56, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: Clang does not support global registered variables so it's not supposed to work. Is this a feature? Is there a reason why clang couldn't be updated to support this if actual software is using