[@ ports committers] ports/173531

2012-12-16 Thread Marco Bröder
Hi, could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned for over a month, now. Thank you very much! -- Kind regards signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [@ ports committers] ports/173531

2012-12-16 Thread Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
Hi Marco, Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52: Hi, could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned for over a month, now. Thank you very much! Please review patch attached. I changed some things in your patch: - using OPTIONSFILE instead of UNIQUENAME (it's common

Re: [@ ports committers] ports/173531

2012-12-16 Thread Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59: Hi Marco, Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52: Hi, could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned for over a month, now. Thank you very much! Please review patch attached. I changed some things in your patch: -

Re: [@ ports committers] ports/173531

2012-12-16 Thread Jason E. Hale
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 15:07:48 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59: Hi Marco, Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52: Hi, could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned for over a month, now. Thank you

Re: [@ ports committers] ports/173531

2012-12-16 Thread Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
Jason E. Hale wrote on 16.12.2012 15:13: On Sunday, December 16, 2012 15:07:48 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59: Hi Marco, Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52: Hi, could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned for over a

Re: [@ ports committers] ports/173531

2012-12-16 Thread Marco Bröder
On 16.12.2012 12:25, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: Jason E. Hale wrote on 16.12.2012 15:13: On Sunday, December 16, 2012 15:07:48 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59: Hi Marco, Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52: Hi, could a ports committer take

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2012-12-16 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: Let's talk about subversion/svn

2012-12-16 Thread David Demelier
On 19/11/2012 08:16, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Given the incessant focus on everything using Subversion now (please do not get me started, it will be like arguing with a brick wall), I'd like to know what the plan is for minimising the number of dependencies. The present subversion **package** on

Re: Let's talk about subversion/svn

2012-12-16 Thread Eitan Adler
On 16 December 2012 10:51, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: We should write a snup tool similar to csup, a bootstrap tool that depends on nothing and can fetch both src/ ports/ and doc/ repositories with branches support. Absolutely. If you want to help just svn checkout

Re: Let's talk about subversion/svn

2012-12-16 Thread David Demelier
On 16/12/2012 16:55, Eitan Adler wrote: On 16 December 2012 10:51, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: We should write a snup tool similar to csup, a bootstrap tool that depends on nothing and can fetch both src/ ports/ and doc/ repositories with branches support. Absolutely. If

Re: Let's talk about subversion/svn

2012-12-16 Thread Eitan Adler
On 16 December 2012 11:02, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: Absolutely. If you want to help just svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/des/svnsup and start hacking! Oh really great, didn't know a project like that started! It is started, but stalled: someone needs to

devel/gdb does not compile with gcc47+

2012-12-16 Thread Jakub Lach
Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.3 20121208 (prerelease) (FreeBSD Ports Collection) configure:4043: $? = 0 configure:4032: gcc47 -V 5 gcc47: error: unrecognized command line option '-V' gcc47: fatal error: no input files compilation terminated. configure:4043: $? = 1 configure:4032: gcc47

Bash-4.2

2012-12-16 Thread Jerry
The current Bash-4.2 in the ports is only current to patch level 37. Now that the port freeze is over, can the port be updated to level 39 which is the current level? -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.