Re: Python libraries moved

2013-03-03 Thread Robert Simmons
Ports tree updated, but it is still a problem. I don't see anything that was checked in recently that mentions this problem. On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 12:08:41AM -0500, Robert

Re: FreeBSD port for redirecting printer

2013-03-03 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, March 01, 2013 a las 04:14:34PM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: ok, at the moment only the CUPS filter do what we want directly from an UTF-8 test file (q.e.d.) To be honestly, when we started some years ago to port our library automation system from ISO 8859-1 to UTF-8 support

Re: please update eclipse and eclipse-devel to remove libxul19 [was: please update java/eclipse to www/libxul]

2013-03-03 Thread kron
On 2013/02/27 08:00, kron wrote: On 2013/02/26 00:06, Ronald Klop wrote: On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:54:37 +0100, kron kro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, may I ask any of committers to process Jimmy Kelley's patch (ports/174846)? The patch works for me. Eclipse is still on www/libxul19 while

Re: Python libraries moved

2013-03-03 Thread Li-Wen Hsu
I'm terribly sorry about this, I'm walking through the tree and will fix the breakage soonest as possible. On Sunday, March 3, 2013, Robert Simmons wrote: Ports tree updated, but it is still a problem. I don't see anything that was checked in recently that mentions this problem. On Sun, Mar

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I believe evince supports form filling of PDFs, but I don't know if it's a little heavyweight for you. it's actually OK. i will test it further but seems fine It's definitely an improvement on Adobe Reader. it's hard to imagine something worse. Chris

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
The annoying situation is when the PDF file isn't really designed for PDF wasn't designed for editing from the first place. But Adobe decided to f..k up their own standard and added extensions to create PDF with forms. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:32:18 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar articulated: It's definitely an improvement on Adobe Reader. it's hard to imagine something worse. On FreeBSD, I would agree. If you can even get Adobe Reader to work at all it is a miracle. However, on n MS Windows system, I have

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:33:06 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar articulated: PDF wasn't designed for editing from the first place. But Adobe decided to f..k up their own standard and added extensions to create PDF with forms. *Citation needed -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Of course, it's pretty offtopic, but in my knowing there's no other office format allowing to send to someone some form to fill. Read-only form. With required fields. Not everyone in this world stuck with console and some vim or even cat echo :) There was PDF, which was pretty read-only (for most

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Bob Eager
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 06:30:53 -0500 Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:32:18 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar articulated: It's definitely an improvement on Adobe Reader. it's hard to imagine something worse. On FreeBSD, I would agree. If you can even get Adobe

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-03-03 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: CFT: texlive ports

2013-03-03 Thread Chris Rees
On 1 March 2013 12:12, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 05:44:35 +0900 (JST) Subject: Re: CFT: texlive ports From: Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130301-1.tar.gz Built fine on

Re: please update eclipse and eclipse-devel to remove libxul19 [was: please update java/eclipse to www/libxul]

2013-03-03 Thread Greg Lewis
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 09:51:15AM +0100, kron wrote: On 2013/02/27 08:00, kron wrote: On 2013/02/26 00:06, Ronald Klop wrote: On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:54:37 +0100, kron kro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, may I ask any of committers to process Jimmy Kelley's patch (ports/174846)? The

Re: please update eclipse and eclipse-devel to remove libxul19 [was: please update java/eclipse to www/libxul]

2013-03-03 Thread kron
On 2013/03/03 16:49, Greg Lewis wrote: Since me and Roland haven't attracted any attention at freebsd-eclipse@ I'm moving this to freebsd-ports@. The PRs at hand are ports/174846 and ports/175826. May we ask committers to process the patches? TIA Oli I've just noticed glewis@ has

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Bernt Hansson
2013-03-03 12:31, Jerry skrev: On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:33:06 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar articulated: PDF wasn't designed for editing from the first place. But Adobe decided to f..k up their own standard and added extensions to create PDF with forms. *Citation needed PDF wasn't designed

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
it's hard to imagine something worse. On FreeBSD, I would agree. If you can even get Adobe Reader to work at all it is a miracle. acroread9 from ports. after starting OK it idles, then after like 10 seconds it spawns separate process that use 100% CPU and do no idea what. Doesn't seem like

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Of course, it's pretty offtopic, but in my knowing there's no other office format allowing to send to someone some form to fill. Read-only form. With required fields. how about HTML? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Windows. I find it quite appallingly bloated. I too tend to use Windows for PDFs, but use Foxit Reader. in windows it is usable but slow. Still - it doesn't take 100% CPU when idle. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

X11 - geode driver

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
anyone knows a patch or alternative driver for geode (wyse S50, Natsemi Geode 5535) that works well. There are none from ports, but i downloaded latest geode sources from x.org, compiled without problems and it runs. But performance is just a bit better than with acceleration off, sometimes

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from Firefox 18 to 19. Am I the only one to notice this? sorry if it is not an answer you like, but just stick with older firefox. Version 10.0.0...-esr from older ports seems fine. later is plain terrible. And i don't see a problems

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
2013/3/3 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Of course, it's pretty offtopic, but in my knowing there's no other office format allowing to send to someone some form to fill. Read-only form. With required fields. how about HTML? If you are serious - you just can't easily make

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-03 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from Firefox 18 to 19. Am I the only one to notice this? Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Bison_skull_pile_edit.jpg I have the same problem

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-03 Thread John
Hi! Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from Firefox 18 to 19. Am I the only one to notice this? Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Bison_skull_pile_edit.jp g I have the same

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
And if you just trolling me - I'm not buying :) P.S. Let's close this offtopic anyway. fine ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Bison_skull_pile_edit.jp g I have the same problem with 17.0.1 on 9.1-amd64. I'm seeing it with 18.0.2 on amd64 with 9.1-stable r247548 firefox 17.0.3 on FreeBSD 9-latest

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-03 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Bison_skull_pile_edit.jp g I have the same problem with 17.0.1 on 9.1-amd64. I'm seeing it with 18.0.2 on amd64 with 9.1-stable r247548 firefox 17.0.3 on

Using RUN_DEPENDS := ${BUILD_DEPENDS} is now a bug

2013-03-03 Thread Eitan Adler
Some time ago (2012-01-21 17:40:15 UTC) I committed a change which converted all uses of BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS} to BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS} Writing: At the moment 1385 ports use BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS} and 450 ports use BUILD_DEPENDS:= ${RUN_DEPENDS}. This patch

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-03 Thread Jan Beich
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) writes: Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from Firefox 18 to 19. Am I the only one to notice this? Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this:

Distfiles at komquats.com

2013-03-03 Thread Cy Schubert
Just a heads up that distfiles hosted on komquats.com will be unavailable today until I update my apache server, when I get to a computer later today. ~cy small keyboard in use. cy.schub...@komquats.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Failure to build gettext

2013-03-03 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
* David J. Weller-Fahy dave-lists-freebsd-po...@weller-fahy.com [2013-02-21 21:05 -0500]: I'm currently unable to build gettext from ports Apologies: this was a local error. At some point in converting from source upgrades to freebsd-update, some header files went missing. A rebuildworld

Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-03 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Jan Beich wrote: na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) writes: Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from Firefox 18 to 19. Am I the only one to notice this? Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this:

Re: net-im/hotot fetch failure (size mismatch)

2013-03-03 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:35:56PM +0900, meta wrote: net-im/hotot fails to fetch. I'm not sure which is correct distinfo vs actual but please see it. should be fixed in r313393, thanks for reporting! ./danfe ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing