On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Joerg Surmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ok.
>>> here the complet make output.
>>> (without make install)
>>
>> Actually, it was just the STDERR output withou
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>>
>> ok.
>> here the complet make output.
>> (without make install)
>
> Actually, it was just the STDERR output without the STDOUT stuff. To
> get far we need to have the complete outpu
On 2013-03-22 19:31, AN wrote:
FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #38 r248401: Sat Mar
16 21:39:04 CDT 2013 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL
amd64
cc -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DHASTASKS -DHAS_PAUSE_SBT
-DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNODE -DHAS_FILEDESCENT -DHASWCT
Please update your ports tree.
On Mar 23, 2013, at 8:31 AM, AN wrote:
> FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #38 r248401: Sat Mar 16
> 21:39:04 CDT 2013 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
>
> cc -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DHASTASKS -DHAS_PAUSE_SBT
> -DHASEFF
FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #38 r248401: Sat Mar 16
21:39:04 CDT 2013 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
cc -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DHASTASKS -DHAS_PAUSE_SBT
-DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNODE -DHAS_FILEDESCENT -DHASWCTYPE_H
-DHASSBSTATE -DHAS_KVM
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>
> ok.
> here the complet make output.
> (without make install)
Actually, it was just the STDERR output without the STDOUT stuff. To
get far we need to have the complete output.
% script
% cd /usr/ports/multimedia/fmpeg1 && make
% exit
Then
I seem to have found the solution to the problem: lang/gcc needs to have
symlinks in /usr/bin.
Create these:
# ln -s /usr/local/bin/gcc46 /usr/bin/gcc
# ln -s /usr/local/bin/g++46 /usr/bin/g++
This way most, "gcc not found" errors should disappear.
With many thanks to René Ladan
--
View this me
- Convert to PEAR_AUTOINSTALL
-
Build ID: 20130315012200-60478
Job owner: m...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 8 days
Enddate: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:11:17 GMT
Revision: r314210
Reposit
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:11 PM, John Marino wrote:
> I wouldn't be so quick to blame poudriere.
>
I'm not interested in "blaming" anyone... it is probably a config problem.
I simply asked how to get the error output for a port built inside
poudriere. And this:
> e.g. look in /usr/local/poud
2013/3/22 J David
> We are rapidly converting all of our ports-building infrastructure to
> poudriere, which is a fantastic tool and has been a huge improvement for
> us.
>
> However, I do run across the occasional stubborn ports that refuse to build
> (example: lang/ghc) under poudriere, and I'm
On 3/22/2013 18:51, J David wrote:
We are rapidly converting all of our ports-building infrastructure to
poudriere, which is a fantastic tool and has been a huge improvement for us.
However, I do run across the occasional stubborn ports that refuse to build
(example: lang/ghc) under poudriere, a
On 18 March 2013 19:53, Thomas Zander wrote:
> Thank you all for testing and reporting your experiences. I have
> submitted this patch set now.
> In case you experience problems, let me know (and provide a patch if
> possible).
Updated patch set available, please see:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi
We are rapidly converting all of our ports-building infrastructure to
poudriere, which is a fantastic tool and has been a huge improvement for us.
However, I do run across the occasional stubborn ports that refuse to build
(example: lang/ghc) under poudriere, and I'm not sure how to debug this.
I
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:41 AM, joerg_surmann wrote:
>
> Thanks for replay.
> Yes it's on the end of build.
> in a attachment is a .txt file with more information.
>
>
>
> Am 22.03.2013 02:02, schrieb Kevin Oberman:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:54 PM, joerg_surmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> -BEGIN
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 22.03.2013 08:25 (UTC+2), Leslie Jensen wrote:
>>
>> According to /usr/ports/UPDATING
>>
>> One should do
>>
>> portmaster -r poppler-0
>>
>> Unfortunately it gives me this:
>>
>> ===>>> Launching child to reinstall libreoffice-4.0.1
>>
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:58:48 +0100 Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Several months ago, I sent you a port skeleton for OpenCASCADE 6.5.2.
> The version in ports is still at 6.3.
> In the meanwhile 6.5.2 is already old, as 6.5.3 is out.
>
> I understand there are other ports in the tree which
On 03/22/2013 11:51 AM, bw wrote:
what's the proper way to do it?
As far as I understand from googling around, and please correct me if
I'm wrong, the way to compile ports with openssl is, first install
openssl from ports, then add WITH_OPENSSL_PORTS=YES to make.conf, then
compile everything tha
Hello.
Several months ago, I sent you a port skeleton for OpenCASCADE 6.5.2.
The version in ports is still at 6.3.
In the meanwhile 6.5.2 is already old, as 6.5.3 is out.
I understand there are other ports in the tree which require OpenCASCADE
6.3.
My proposal is to rename 6.3 from opencascad
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:37:05 +0100 Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Up to today, I've had the two ports in subject installed without any
> problem.
> Today, while making some upgrades, I see they conflict...
>
> Why do they suddenly do this?
Because qt4 ports fail to build in the presence o
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 04:09:22PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> indexbu...@freebsd.org wrote on 22.03.2013 16:02:
> > INDEX build failed with errors:
> > Generating INDEX-8 - please
> > wait.."/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/japanese/w3m/../../www/w3m/Makefile",
> > line 39: Malformed condi
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:14 PM, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> On a system with a large number of ports installed and where some have been
> installed from binaries and some compiled what is the neatest way to remove
> the binary packages and replace them with local compilations.
>
> Thanks in a
Hi
On a system with a large number of ports installed and where some have
been installed from binaries and some compiled what is the neatest way
to remove the binary packages and replace them with local compilations.
Thanks in advance
David
--
David Southwell ARPS AFIAP
Photographic Arts
Tra
indexbu...@freebsd.org wrote on 22.03.2013 16:02:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-8 - please
wait.."/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/japanese/w3m/../../www/w3m/Makefile", line
39: Malformed conditional (${PORT_OPTIONS:MM17N})
"/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/japanese/w3m/../../www/w
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-8 - please
wait.."/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/japanese/w3m/../../www/w3m/Makefile", line
39: Malformed conditional (${PORT_OPTIONS:MM17N})
"/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/japanese/w3m/../../www/w3m/Makefile", line 42:
if-less else
"/home/indexbui
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:51:32 +0100
bw articulated:
> As far as I understand from googling around, and please correct me if
> I'm wrong, the way to compile ports with openssl is, first install
> openssl from ports, then add WITH_OPENSSL_PORTS=YES to make.conf,
> then compile everything that uses
On 3/20/2013 9:08 AM, David Southwell wrote:
On 3/20/2013 7:53 AM, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
bigbluebutton Makefile reads:
SOFFICEBIN?=
${PREFIX}/openoffice.org-3.2.1/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin
with an uptodate portree we have the correct path is:
openofice-3.4.1/openoffice.org3/p
what's the proper way to do it?
As far as I understand from googling around, and please correct me if
I'm wrong, the way to compile ports with openssl is, first install
openssl from ports, then add WITH_OPENSSL_PORTS=YES to make.conf, then
compile everything that uses openssl. That is, with so
Hi!
In config dialog i check OPENLDAP, LDAP_SASL and SASL2.
The make process ignores an option LDAP_SASL.
As a result i see "unsupported parameter value: bind = SASL" in output of
"postmap" command.
As a solution, i added "-DUSE_LDAP_SASL" directly into Makefile in do-configure
section:
do-con
Hello,
Looks like net/remmina-plugin-rdp is broken by the update of net/freerdp
poudriere build logs for remmina-plugin-rdp:
...
===> remmina-plugin-rdp-0.9.2_1 depends on shared library: freerdp.0 - not
found
===>Verifying install for freerdp.0 in /usr/ports/net/freerdp
===> Installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks for replay.
Yes it's on the end of build.
in a attachment is a .txt file with more information.
Am 22.03.2013 02:02, schrieb Kevin Oberman:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:54 PM, joerg_surmann wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
On 22.03.2013 08:25 (UTC+2), Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> According to /usr/ports/UPDATING
>
> One should do
>
> portmaster -r poppler-0
>
> Unfortunately it gives me this:
>
> ===>>> Launching child to reinstall libreoffice-4.0.1
>
> ===>>> Checking dependent ports >> libreoffice-4.0.1 (9/9)
>
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:25:15 +0100
Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> According to /usr/ports/UPDATING
>
> One should do
>
> portmaster -r poppler-0
>
>
>
> Unfortunately it gives me this:
>
>
> ===>>> Launching child to reinstall libreoffice-4.0.1
>
> ===>>> Checking dependent ports >> libreoffic
According to /usr/ports/UPDATING
One should do
portmaster -r poppler-0
Unfortunately it gives me this:
===>>> Launching child to reinstall libreoffice-4.0.1
===>>> Checking dependent ports >> libreoffice-4.0.1 (9/9)
===>>> Currently installed version: libreoffice-4.0.1
===>>> Port direct
35 matches
Mail list logo
