php5-ice Needs Updating

Hi there. Just thought I would let you guys know that php5-ice doesn't install as v3.4 isn't compatible PHP 5.14.x. Below is the error output of attempted install from ports: ===>  php5-Ice-3.4.2 cannot be installed: doesn't work with lang/php5 port (doesn't support PHP 5.4). *** [install] Err

[QAT] r314688: 4x leftovers

Upgrade to 3.0.6. - Build ID: 20130319203600-3903 Job owner: thie...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 8 days Enddate: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 01:35:27 GMT Revision: r314688 Repository:

Re: Status of packages

> No. The security concerns are that some "attacker" could infect binaries > and add dangerous code if he manages to break out of a jail Then the FreeBSD jail facilities are flawed/insufficient and need fixed. > or place > malicious code in some packages that are used as dependencies. Either the

Re: grub2 with libzfs

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:31:50AM -0700, Beeblebrox wrote: > EDIT: I just tried "make" (without the --enable-libzfs) flag for grub 2.0 and > got different error: > > grub-2.00 # make > "Makefile", line 20946: Need an operator > > line 20946 is: > 44: export LC_COLLATE := C > 45: export LC_CTYPE

Re: grub2 with libzfs

Beeblebrox a écrit : > Your Makefile went pretty well for a while - config ran cleanly without any > problems. > >>> You're compiling with gcc and use gcc46 include files? > I have lang/gcc46 installed, but found that many gnu-related ports gave gcc > errors. Then I found the fix like this (until

grub2 with libzfs

Your Makefile went pretty well for a while - config ran cleanly without any problems. >>You're compiling with gcc and use gcc46 include files? I have lang/gcc46 installed, but found that many gnu-related ports gave gcc errors. Then I found the fix like this (until gcc port is modified to correct

Re: grub2 with libzfs

Beeblebrox a écrit : >>> current version of grub2 in the ports could be sufficient for your need > That's what I had hoped for and expected, but the port build fails (that's > why I had contacted the port maintainer Sergey Matveychuk). Build for grub > 1.98_1 breaks at: > > gcc -Iefiemu -I./efiemu

grub2 with libzfs

Christian: It seems I did not understand your first post very well: You are saying that I can also try your tarball, but I thought it was only a patch to the grub repository. So I'll go ahead and give your sourcecode+pathc tarball a try and see if it compiles. Your first post is missing the link t

Re: Status of packages

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:37 PM, grarpamp wrote: >>> It's nice to see something like redports. It can be helpful to those using >>> ports to diagnose their local builds against the output of a formal >>> sandbox >>> service for the project. It would be cool if the logs, build hiers and >>> package

grub2 with libzfs

>> current version of grub2 in the ports could be sufficient for your need That's what I had hoped for and expected, but the port build fails (that's why I had contacted the port maintainer Sergey Matveychuk). Build for grub 1.98_1 breaks at: gcc -Iefiemu -I./efiemu -nostdinc -isystem /usr/local/l

Re: grub2 with libzfs

>> current version of grub2 in the ports could be sufficient for your need That's what I had hoped for and expected, but the port build fails (that's why I had contacted the port maintainer Sergey Matveychuk). Build for grub 1.98_1 breaks at: gcc -Iefiemu -I./efiemu -nostdinc -isystem /usr/local/l

Re: grub2 with libzfs

Beeblebrox a écrit : > EDIT: I just tried "make" (without the --enable-libzfs) flag for grub 2.0 and > got different error: > > grub-2.00 # make > "Makefile", line 20946: Need an operator > > line 20946 is: > 44: export LC_COLLATE := C > 45: export LC_CTYPE := C > 46: unexport LC_ALL > > Which sour

Re: grub2 with libzfs

Beeblebrox a écrit : > Hi, very happy to see that there are other grub fans in FreeBSD-land! > > I was planning to place my grub on a separate UFS partition so that I can > boot other things (like loopbacked iso's) if I should want to. The grub UFS > partition only has grub files in it (what mounts

Re: Installation issue

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:53:50 +0530 kumaresan chandran articulated: > I have been trying to install* FREEBSD PORTS* on my machine. I have > download the installable from this site http://www.freebsd.org > As the per the instruction mentioned on your site . > http://www.freebsd.org

grub2 with libzfs

Trying gmake (thanks for the suggestion to SW) grub-2.00 # gmake flex -o grub_script.yy.c --header-file=grub_script.yy.h ./grub-core/script/yylex.l flex: can't open grub_script.yy.c gmake: *** [grub_script.yy.h] Error 1 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/gru

grub2 with libzfs

EDIT: I just tried "make" (without the --enable-libzfs) flag for grub 2.0 and got different error: grub-2.00 # make "Makefile", line 20946: Need an operator line 20946 is: 44: export LC_COLLATE := C 45: export LC_CTYPE := C 46: unexport LC_ALL Which source are you using? -- View this message

grub2 with libzfs

Hi, very happy to see that there are other grub fans in FreeBSD-land! I was planning to place my grub on a separate UFS partition so that I can boot other things (like loopbacked iso's) if I should want to. The grub UFS partition only has grub files in it (what mounts under /boot/grub) and no kern

Re: is it a good idea to overwrite GCC_DEFAULT_VERSION= in Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jeremy Messenger > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Jeremy Messenger >>> wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Andre

Re: grub2 with libzfs

Hello, You don't need libzfs to use grub2 on ZFS. You just need to specify the zfs module if your 'grub-install' target is a ZFS dataset. I've submitted a patch for this port a while ago, There are probably issues I'm not aware of but I've been using this custom port for the last 6 months without

Re: Status of packages

>> It's nice to see something like redports. It can be helpful to those using >> ports to diagnose their local builds against the output of a formal >> sandbox >> service for the project. It would be cool if the logs, build hiers and >> packages >> from such a buildbot were accessible. They'd obvio

Re: FreeBSD Port: acpi_call-1.0.1

Here it is https://github.com/gelraen/acpi_call On 27 March 2013 15:15, Yahor Shybeka wrote: > OK. > > Thanks, > Yahor > > On 27.03.2013 07:10, Maxim Ignatenko wrote: >> Sure. But can you send it as pull request on github if I put source there? >> >> On 27 March 2013 14:07, Yahor Shybeka wrote:

Installation issue

Hi, I have been trying to install* FREEBSD PORTS* on my machine. I have download the installable from this site http://www.freebsd.org As the per the instruction mentioned on your site . http://www.freebsd.org, I tired to installation but was not able to. It i

grub2 with libzfs

I know grub2 is not very popular with the FreeBSD community, but I like it. Currently the grub2 port looks broken and port maintainer has advised me that he plans on dropping the port soon. I don't see any point in filing a PR at this point... This leaves git/svn trunk from the grub2 download site

Re: FreeBSD Port: acpi_call-1.0.1

OK. Thanks, Yahor On 27.03.2013 07:10, Maxim Ignatenko wrote: > Sure. But can you send it as pull request on github if I put source there? > > On 27 March 2013 14:07, Yahor Shybeka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could you please review attached patches? They're adding >> ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE handling. >> >> -

Re: FreeBSD Port: acpi_call-1.0.1

Sure. But can you send it as pull request on github if I put source there? On 27 March 2013 14:07, Yahor Shybeka wrote: > Hi, > > Could you please review attached patches? They're adding > ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE handling. > > -- > Thanks, > Yahor > -- Best regards, Maxim __

FreeBSD Port: acpi_call-1.0.1

Hi, Could you please review attached patches? They're adding ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE handling. -- Thanks, Yahor acpi_call.txz Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To un

Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKs

Dear port maintainers, The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports confli

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Ports should provide knobs disabling unwanted network services

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:03:09AM -0700, Beeblebrox wrote: > Sorry for the late reply, everyone - I was distracted with some other things > for a while. > > PATCHING: > I'll probably have to look through the syntax of "OPTIONS" in the Makefiles > of other KDE / CMAKE ports to get a handle on how

Ports should provide knobs disabling unwanted network services

Sorry for the late reply, everyone - I was distracted with some other things for a while. PATCHING: I'll probably have to look through the syntax of "OPTIONS" in the Makefiles of other KDE / CMAKE ports to get a handle on how to implement. Bapt >> you can have it installed on your system but not