- Update to 1.35
- Most patches have been accepted upstreams. The remaining ones have been
submitted on http://sourceforge.net/p/xfe/bugs/176/
Release notes:
This release adds a scripts feature: like in Nautilus, users can now apply
custom shell scripts to a list of selected files. See th
Hello.
In ports we have Cacti 0.8.8a.
According to 0.8.8b release notes
(http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_0_8_8b.php), "multiple ... SQL
injection vulnerabilities" were fixed in that release.
Portaudit doesn't bring up any warning.
Is the version in our port tree safe?
bye & Thanks
Hi,
Not really, according to cve, releases before 0.8.8b are affected,
and we have 0.8.8a.
- rodrigo
On 28/08/13 09:49 +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In ports we have Cacti 0.8.8a.
> According to 0.8.8b release notes
> (http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_0_8_8b.php), "multiple ...
Le 28/08/2013 10:10, Rodrigo OSORIO a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Not really, according to cve, releases before 0.8.8b are affected,
> and we have 0.8.8a.
>
> - rodrigo
And before 0.8.8b there is 0.8.8a. Or I missed something?
--
Florent Peterschmitt | Please:
flor...@peterschmitt.fr|
On 8/28/2013 10:27, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
> Le 28/08/2013 10:10, Rodrigo OSORIO a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not really, according to cve, releases before 0.8.8b are affected,
>> and we have 0.8.8a.
>>
>> - rodrigo
>
> And before 0.8.8b there is 0.8.8a. Or I missed something?
You are agreeing wit
Le 28/08/2013 10:30, John Marino a écrit :
> He is saying the ports tree version is 0.8.8a and thus not safe, the
> response to the question "is the port tree version safe?"
Aha, so I missed something :)
> John
--
Florent Peterschmitt | Please:
flor...@peterschmitt.fr| * Avoi
> In ports we have Cacti 0.8.8a.
> According to 0.8.8b release notes
> (http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_0_8_8b.php), "multiple ... SQL
> injection vulnerabilities" were fixed in that release.
> Portaudit doesn't bring up any warning.
I just send a PR to update the vuxml database ( ports/181
According to John-Mark Gurney on Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:27:28PM -0700:
> I guess now we need to figure out how to teach OpenSSL to use AES-NI
> natively even when /dev/crypto is available...
>
> but at least we did solve the (non-)issue of bad OpenSSL performance...
Excellent analysis, thank you
Hi!
> > In ports we have Cacti 0.8.8a.
> > According to 0.8.8b release notes
> > (http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_0_8_8b.php), "multiple ... SQL
> > injection vulnerabilities" were fixed in that release.
> > Portaudit doesn't bring up any warning.
>
> I just send a PR to update the vuxml dat
There is a problem building any of the "*-freebsd-doc-*" ports if the
user has texlive installed and "TEX_DEFAULT=texlive" is placed in the
"/etc/make.conf" file. Actually, the ports cannot be built.
I realize that FreeBSD-10 is on the horizon. I am also aware that the
modus operandi of FreeBSD is
Thanks!! Your suggestion corrected my problem.
Ben Hacker Jr.
ITT Exelis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Hurling [mailto:rhur...@gwdg.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 12:42 AM
To: Hacker, Benjamin T - GS
Cc: 'sunp...@freebsd.org'; 'po...@freebsd.org'
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port:
On 27 August 2013 20:13, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I just did a portsnap run that updated the base port system.
>
> Now I see a port's distfile going to /var/ports/distfiles instead of
> /usr/ports/distfiles.
>
> Is this a error in the newly updated base port system which contains the
> default port make env
ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 August 2013 20:13, Fbsd8 wrote:
I just did a portsnap run that updated the base port system.
Now I see a port's distfile going to /var/ports/distfiles instead of
/usr/ports/distfiles.
Is this a error in the newly updated base port system which contains the
defaul
Trying to use cdrecord from cdrtools-devel on 9.2-PRERELEASE amd64 from
Saturday, a generic kernel, gives
:-( unable to CAMGETPASSTHRU for /dev/cd1: Inappropriate ioctl for
device
Rebuilding cdrtools-devel does not help. What changed?
___
freebsd
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:19:02AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> There is a problem building any of the "*-freebsd-doc-*" ports if the
> user has texlive installed and "TEX_DEFAULT=texlive" is placed in the
> "/etc/make.conf" file. Actually, the ports cannot be built.
>
Hello,
This is a known problem. A
Hi!
It's this time again, there's a new vlc version out and I'd like to
update the port:
svn co https://svn.redports.org/nox/multimedia/vlc/
I have applied two PRs as well, ports/181596 and ports/181610, so
livemedia and ncurses should work better now as well:
http://www.freeb
Jos Chrispijn wrote:
William Grzybowski:
There is a PR for it, ports/177839. I'll take care.
thanks William, keep up the good work!
Best regards,
Jos Chrispijn
Hi
I have open two PR about this port, one for the new version
(ports/180832) and for the postProcess script terminated with unkn
17 matches
Mail list logo