FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2013-09-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2013-09-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2013-09-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

[HEADS UP] Improved python package support ahead

2013-09-21 Thread Marcus von Appen
Two new port Makefile knobs are to be committed to the ports tree in a couple of days or few weeks. PYDISTUTILS_AUTOPLIST This knob will enable the creation of an automatic package list similar to the linux rpm ports and rubygems. It will work for the majority packages that do not install files o

[CFT/HEADSUP] Ports now have Stack Protector support

2013-09-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly respect LDFLAGS. To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and rebuild all ports. The d

New devd-based X.Org autoconfiguration backend

2013-09-21 Thread Vitaly Magerya
On 09/09/2013 17:52, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> The attached patch, also available in the latest updated version at >> http://people.freebsd.org/~zeising/xorg-mesaupdate.diff >> updates various xorg related libraries and drivers, most of this is >> visible for all users of xorg. >> xorg-server now ha

Re: [CFT/HEADSUP] Ports now have Stack Protector support

2013-09-21 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 09/21/13 05:47, Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. Why only those architectures? -Nathan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [CFT/HEADSUP] Ports now have Stack Protector support

2013-09-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/21/2013 9:00 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 09/21/13 05:47, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >> > > Why only those architectures? > -Nathan I was only able to test on

Re: [CFT/HEADSUP] Ports now have Stack Protector support

2013-09-21 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 09/21/13 09:09, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 9/21/2013 9:00 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: On 09/21/13 05:47, Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. Why only those architectures? -Nathan

Re: [CFT/HEADSUP] Ports now have Stack Protector support

2013-09-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/21/2013 9:26 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 09/21/13 09:09, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 9/21/2013 9:00 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> On 09/21/13 05:47, Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 i386 and amd64, and older releases on a

net-mgmt/netmond is too old

2013-09-21 Thread Victor Sudakov
Dear Colleagues, The net-mgmt/netmond port is very old. netmond-2.3.7 is already available at http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/netmond-2.3.7.tgz Could you update the port please? I have tested netmond-2.3.7 on 8.4-RELEASE i386 with about 80 objects, it works just fine. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RI

Re: Gimp package?

2013-09-21 Thread grarpamp
On 9/19/13, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 09/19/13 12:46, grarpamp wrote: > >> Hi. I see that a gimp port exists so I went to try the gimp package >> but could not find it in the stable i386 package branches on >> the FTP server, or in say 9 stable amd64. Is there a problem >> building or distributing i

Re: Help in testing Basho Riak port

2013-09-21 Thread Big Lebowski
Thank you all for your work and valuable comments! Please, test the latest version of the port, that you can find here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/me9ej0br78ayws1/riak.20130921.tgz and let me know if you can find any issues. Kind regards, B. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Big Lebowski wrote

Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

2013-09-21 Thread Big Lebowski
Hi, Thanks for your comments, see mine below. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:57:52PM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote: > > Hi list! > > > > I've been working for couple last days on porting Basho Riak database > > (latest version 1.4.2) and finally

Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

2013-09-21 Thread Big Lebowski
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > You also need this in the pkg-plist to fix it being a leftover: > > @dirrmtry %%RIAK_DBDIR%% > Unfortunately this doesnt work, because it gets expanded to /usr/local//var/db/riak from pkg-plist. That's why its not there. B. > > That w

Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

2013-09-21 Thread Big Lebowski
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Sep 21, 2013, at 21:58, Big Lebowski wrote: > ... > > While this is of course true, their package has some issues: > > > > * it doesnt work with pkgng - mine, built with make package from port > does > > * it is using and requiring sudo

Re: Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

2013-09-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/21/2013 5:08 PM, Big Lebowski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> You also need this in the pkg-plist to fix it being a leftover: >> >> @dirrmtry %%RIAK_DBDIR%% >> > > Unfortunately this doesnt work, because it gets expanded to > /usr/local//var/db/riak fr

Re: Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

2013-09-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/21/2013 5:08 PM, Big Lebowski wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your comments, see mine below. > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:57:52PM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote: >>> Hi list! >>> >>> I've been working for couple last days on porting Ba

Re: net-mgmt/netmond is too old

2013-09-21 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:40:09PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Could you update the port please? The best way to help with this is to file a PR; with the patches (if you have already made them). mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://l

Re: [CFT/HEADSUP] Ports now have Stack Protector support

2013-09-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/21/2013 5:47 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. > > Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly > respect LDFLAGS. > > To enable, just add WIT

Re: net-mgmt/netmond is too old

2013-09-21 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 21.09.2013 19:40, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > The net-mgmt/netmond port is very old. netmond-2.3.7 is already > available at http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/netmond-2.3.7.tgz > > Could you update the port please? > > I have tested netmond-2.3.7 on 8.4-RELEASE i386 with about 80

Re: net-mgmt/netmond is too old

2013-09-21 Thread Victor Sudakov
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > > > The net-mgmt/netmond port is very old. netmond-2.3.7 is already > > available at http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/netmond-2.3.7.tgz > > > > Could you update the port please? > > > > I have tested netmond-2.3.7 on 8.4-RELEASE i386 with about 80 objects, > > it works

Re: net-mgmt/netmond is too old

2013-09-21 Thread Victor Sudakov
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:40:09PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Could you update the port please? > > The best way to help with this is to file a PR; with the patches > (if you have already made them). > Andrey, Do you care to prepare the patches or should I do it? -

Re: net-mgmt/netmond is too old

2013-09-21 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 22.09.2013 08:18, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:40:09PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: >>> Could you update the port please? >> >> The best way to help with this is to file a PR; with the patches >> (if you have already made them). >> > > Andrey, > >