On 10/13/13 18:40, Joe Nosay wrote:
Will the pkg upgrade work with applications built from ports and not pkg
add $APPLICATION?
I'm not sure What you mean.
the pkg upgrade command works only using binary packages, which can
come and official repository or your own one.
This is going to
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Guido Falsi madpi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/13/13 18:40, Joe Nosay wrote:
Will the pkg upgrade work with applications built from ports and not pkg
add $APPLICATION?
I'm not sure What you mean.
the pkg upgrade command works only using binary packages,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, the wise Larry Rosenman wrote:
re-checkout the tree
I did a re-checkout but I'm still getting errors:
Updating '/usr/ports':
svn: E02: Can't open file
'/usr/ports/.svn/pristine/3d/3d137a82c6597c2c70a7f77b171e7456196e847e.svn-base':
No such file or directory
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:53:56 +0200 (CEST)
Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, the wise Larry Rosenman wrote:
re-checkout the tree
I did a re-checkout but I'm still getting errors:
Updating '/usr/ports':
svn: E02: Can't open file
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, the wise Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
rm -fr /usr/ports
svn co ..
I did this too but still no new ports tree:
root@yokozuna:/home/marco# svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head ports
Checked out revision 330285.
root@yokozuna:/home/marco# svn up /usr/ports
Skipped
## Marco Beishuizen (mb...@xs4all.nl):
I did this too but still no new ports tree:
root@yokozuna:/home/marco# svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head ports
Checked out revision 330285.
Your freshly checked out ports tree now lives in /home/marco/ports
(if your line was really copypasted).
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, the wise Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
Your freshly checked out ports tree now lives in /home/marco/ports
(if your line was really copypasted).
You are right. After I redid all the steps (this time the right way) all
seems well now.
Thanks for all the help!
Regards,
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
No matches
Do I understand this situation correctly:
Users are having issues with building/installing packages with STAGEDIR
enabled in lightweight jails that use symlinks to share parts of the
base system between many jails to make it easier to upgrade the jails
and avoid duplication/wasted disk space? It
I have actually noticed many times earlier that using symlinks for
/usr/ports, /usr/src and the related directories do cause problems,
jails or not.
-Kimmo
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
- Convert to USES+=tk
- STAGE-clean
-
Build ID: 20131014130800-53018
Job owner: g...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 2 hours
Enddate: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:29:13 GMT
Revision: r330316
Fix package name collision
-
Build ID: 20131014065401-5671
Job owner: b...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 9 hours
Enddate: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:36:53 GMT
Revision: r330275
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Dewayne
dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au wrote:
My setup is slightly different, where I do use as Matthew recommends,
nullfs is used without symlinks; and pkg_* and portmaster are used for
the build process. We've been using jails to build ports for
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote on 06.10.2013 01:34:
make -V FETCH_CMD
Results:
/usr/bin/fetch -AFpr
on your system? What FreeBSD version you are using?
FreeBSD segfault.tristatelogic.com 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825:
Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 05:49:36 GMT
Dewayne dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au said:
I cannot reproduce it even with openldap24-sasl-client, here.
Since this message is from bsd.ldap.mk, this PR should be assigned to
the maintainer of bsd.ldap.mk rather than individual ports such as
Synopsis: security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd erroneously asserts wrong openldap
version
Responsible-Changed-From-To: ume-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: ume
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 14 16:20:20 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
It seems this is not for individual ports.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:13:51 +0400
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote on 06.10.2013 01:34:
make -V FETCH_CMD
Results:
/usr/bin/fetch -AFpr
on your system? What FreeBSD version you are using?
FreeBSD segfault.tristatelogic.com 9.1-RELEASE
Synopsis: [PATCH] devel/liboil: Fix build with clang
Responsible-Changed-From-To: mm-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: mm
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 14 17:54:58 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reassign back to ports@ as I no longer maintain liboil
The following reply was made to PR ports/182960; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dewayne dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/182960: security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd erroneously asserts
wrong
20 matches
Mail list logo
