style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">Dear
Chipsquips.Com Team,style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:rgb(34,34,34)">
style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">I
thought you might like to know some of the reasons why you are
not g
Hi,
I have had once an application installed that showed the current
network connections as a graph in an X11 window.
Does anybody know the name of such an application?
Thanks!
Erich
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
When a port runs distpatch, the backup file suffix is set to DISTORIG
(default: .bak.orig) so changes from distribution patches and those
from local patches can be kept apart.
This doesn't work any longer; DISTORIG is ignored and distribution
patches also generate .orig files. The problem in bsd.
Ping. After 2 weeks.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At the moment WITH_DEBUG is treated specially by the ports system. I
> propose to turn the old WITH_DEBUG into a port option 'DEBUG' which is
> understood by the port system as a whole (similar to DOCS, etc.
Hi everyone,
I am stuck with the new options framework.
I have a port (emulators/dolphin-emu) that defines the DEBUG option.
Unfortunately, with the DEBUG option set to on, INSTALL_TARGET keeps being
defined to 'install/strip' while it should automatically be set to
'install' by Uses/cmake.mk.
I
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:50:26AM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 12/13/13 11:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > The situation is the same as before for anyone, meaning that by default
> > boost
> > will be linked against the libstdc++ from base on 8 and 9 and libc++ on 10
> > and
> > 11,
On 12/13/13 11:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
The situation is the same as before for anyone, meaning that by default boost
will be linked against the libstdc++ from base on 8 and 9 and libc++ on 10 and
11, that means that you can mix with ports with the exact same risk as you have
now :)
I did
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:41:00AM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 12/13/13 09:47, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > It uses a modern compiler (sorry I haven't been able to make it use gcc from
> > base at all, so it uses clang33 or gcc47+ from ports on FreeBSD 9.1 and
> > FreeBSD
> > 8.*, clan
On 12/13/13 09:47, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
It uses a modern compiler (sorry I haven't been able to make it use gcc from
base at all, so it uses clang33 or gcc47+ from ports on FreeBSD 9.1 and FreeBSD
8.*, clang33 from base in FreeBSD 9.2 (if available) and cc on 10+)
Hello.
Thanks for the wo
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:02:04AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/12/2013 10:47 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > It uses a modern compiler (sorry I haven't been able to make it use gcc
> > from base at all, so it uses clang33 or gcc47+ from ports on FreeBSD 9.1
> > and FreeBSD 8.*, cl
on 13/12/2013 10:47 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> It uses a modern compiler (sorry I haven't been able to make it use gcc
> from base at all, so it uses clang33 or gcc47+ from ports on FreeBSD 9.1
> and FreeBSD 8.*, clang33 from base in FreeBSD 9.2 (if available) and cc on
> 10+)
Just a
Hi,
I have been deseperatly waiting for someone to handle updating boost to the
latest version, this didn't happened so I did it.
http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.55.0.diff
Changes compared to previous version (from the ports point of view) the
libraries are now having the name upstream w
13 matches
Mail list logo
