Re: FreeBSD Port: enlightenment-0.17.5,2

2013-12-24 Thread arrowdodger
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Peter wrote: > Hello, > > I'm testing E17 under the PCBSD10 (based on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3) on my > laptop. > I'm really disappointed by the degradation of some modules (I'm comparing > with 0.16.999.65643 I use on my workstation, under PCBSD 9.1). > I would like to

Re: e: Build/install failure of devel/subversion

2013-12-24 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Then I won't have to boot the NetBSD-current amd64 16 GB USB stick every time > I want to update the src (stable-10 and HEAD), ports and doc trees. > Stable-10 and HEAD has svnlite, so you won't need to install the subversion port to update

openvpn + resolv.conf

2013-12-24 Thread clutton
Hi openvpn users and maintainers. The only missing thing about FreeBSD openvpn structure I've found is lack of resolv support. I've written up script, spending 5 minutes, but guys, does is necessary to write such a script for any installation, for every new user? I think it'll be better to provi

Updating CUPS

2013-12-24 Thread Jerry
The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest version will make it into the ports system soon? Thanks! -- Jerry ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://l

Re: ports/181836

2013-12-24 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Jay Borkenhagen wrote: > Hi, > > Still no activity that I can see. > > Is this really the way the ports process is supposed to work, that > even after a port's maintainer has put a fix in SVN we need to hope a > committer notices it and takes action? Sorry for be

Re: ports/181836

2013-12-24 Thread Fernando ApesteguĆ­a
El 24/12/2013 17:37, "Jay Borkenhagen" escribiĆ³: > > Hi, > > Still no activity that I can see. > > Is this really the way the ports process is supposed to work, that > even after a port's maintainer has put a fix in SVN we need to hope a > committer notices it and takes action? Sorry for being ig

Re: ports/181836

2013-12-24 Thread Jay Borkenhagen
Hi, Still no activity that I can see. Is this really the way the ports process is supposed to work, that even after a port's maintainer has put a fix in SVN we need to hope a committer notices it and takes action? Sorry for being ignorant of the process -- I was just really hoping to be able to

FreeBSD Port: enlightenment-0.17.5,2

2013-12-24 Thread Peter
Hello, I'm testing E17 under the PCBSD10 (based on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3) on my laptop. I'm really disappointed by the degradation of some modules (I'm comparing with 0.16.999.65643 I use on my workstation, under PCBSD 9.1). I would like to know the port status and feature plans - if I must migra

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-12-24 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Build/install failure of devel/subversion

2013-12-24 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 16.12.2013 12:45, schrieb Thomas Mueller: > Earlier I failed, for a different error, to build devel/subversion on > FreeBSD-HEAD amd64. > > Most relevant part of build log was: > > > Compressing man pages (compress-man) > ===> Staging rc.d startup script(s) > ===> Installing for subvers

e: Build/install failure of devel/subversion

2013-12-24 Thread Thomas Mueller
> Same here on 9.2-STABLE. > Looking at the logs, I saw strange libtool lines saying that the libs > mentioned by pkg-static were not installed in /usr/local/lib, and a preamble > about Berkeley DB 6 that had not been tested by Subversion developers and the > fact that subversion's Berkeley DB bac