There comes a time in the life cycle of just about every software package
that it has bee re-evaluated, refreshed, deprecated or just retired.
It is time that we bid farewell to the old pkg_* software that has been
part of FreeBSD since the beginning, and has served us well. After years
of
On 03.02.2014 01:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:14 AM, David Marec david.ma...@davenulle.org wrote:
I don't know why this file was not updated during the hplip installation.
[...]
if there were any changes to hplip.conf file, it doesn't get removed
when the port is
On 2/02/2014 9:51 PM, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-02-02 10:11, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
I filed a PR against textproc/htdig which should really be against the
ports systems.
Would someone be kind enough to advise the current method to specify the
apache version. In ports.conf, I currently
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
On Monday 03 February 2014 02:16:07 Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
On 01/29/2014 07:26 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
On 01/29/2014 07:00 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
I have just updated sage to version 6.0. I have also made some changes
to help it work with FreeBSD-10,
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 AM, David Marec david.ma...@davenulle.org wrote:
On 03.02.2014 01:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:14 AM, David Marec david.ma...@davenulle.org
wrote:
I don't know why this file was not updated during the hplip installation.
[...]
if there
- Stage support
-
Build ID: 20140203094800-14535
Job owner: m...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 7 hours
Enddate: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 17:11:14 GMT
Revision: r342404
Repository:
Allow staging as a regular user
-
Build ID: 20140203181000-36745
Job owner: anto...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 8 minutes
Enddate: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:17:38 GMT
Revision: r342463
There comes a time in the life cycle of just about every software package
that it has bee re-evaluated, refreshed, deprecated or just retired.
It is time that we bid farewell to the old pkg_* software that has been
part of FreeBSD since the beginning, and has served us well. After years
of
On 02/02/14 23:54, Scot Hetzel wrote:
Here's libncursesw.so:
$ cat /usr/local/lib/libncursesw.so
INPUT(libncursesw.so.5 AS_NEEDED(-ltinfow))
I don't get that output when I `cat /usr/local/lib/libncursesw.so`.
When I use `file /usr/local/lib/libncursesw.so*` it shows:
be beneficial in a very short amount of time. Even if you prefer to
compile from source,
I use source, rarely if ever use packages, (except pkg_delete
to remove old broken dependencies). No opinion which scrips are better.
you will still reap the benefits of the modern
packaging system.
Hello.
I've got sendmail with authentication: it uses saslauthd, which in turn
is configured to use PAM; I'm also using nss_ldap.
Authentication works; however I've got my logs filled with messages like:
sm-mta[78808]: s0U6haTm078808: AUTH failure (DIGEST-MD5): user not found
(-20)
On 03/02/2014 21:24, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
be beneficial in a very short amount of time. Even if you prefer to
compile from source,
I use source, rarely if ever use packages, (except pkg_delete
to remove old broken dependencies). No opinion which scrips are better.
you will still
My first post that quotes good: Thunderbird rather than the webmail...
[As this one is about to be send, I see that it is a restate/duplicate
of the one
lost in a webmail glitch ... so apologies...]
On 02/03/14 14:38, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/02/2014 21:24, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
be
Was there a *huge* update to ports tree tonight between around 00:20 and
06:30 CET? Portsnap just fetched 24720 patches (this is more or less
every port I guess), but I can't find anything in
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ that would correspond to this.
I'm a bit worried. :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2/3/14, 9:59 PM, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
Was there a *huge* update to ports tree tonight between around
00:20 and 06:30 CET? Portsnap just fetched 24720 patches (this is
more or less every port I guess), but I can't find anything in
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Jeffrey Bouquet jeffreybouq...@yahoo.comwrote:
My first post that quotes good: Thunderbird rather than the webmail...
[As this one is about to be send, I see that it is a restate/duplicate of
the one
lost in a webmail glitch ... so apologies...]
On
On 04/02/2014 03:23, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
/# find /var/db/pkg -type d -name p5* | xargs -J % find -type f -name
+CONTENTS -exec grep -H 5.12 {} \; | grep pm | gtr -s \/ \n | grep
p5 | sort | uniq | xargs -J % portmaster -d -B -P -i -g % yell || yell
That pipe, corrected ( the working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 2/3/14, 10:22 PM, Xin Li wrote:
On 2/3/14, 9:59 PM, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
Was there a *huge* update to ports tree tonight between around
00:20 and 06:30 CET? Portsnap just fetched 24720 patches (this
is more or less every port I
20 matches
Mail list logo
