From b...@passap.ru Mon Apr 7 21:41:34 2014
The errors are from cups-image now:
http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/logs/cups-image-1.7.1.log
Please test the attached patch (apply to print/cups-base and
test print/cups-image).
yes, fixes the problem, thank you.
Also, if you are interested, here
08.04.2014 08:05, Robert Backhaus пишет:
I've got a printing problem with the new cups. A brother laser using
Foomatic/hpijs-pcl5e, is printing '%PDF-1.3' instead of the required page.
Examining the log file, It is trying to print it using texttops, before
handing that to ghostscript, never
08.04.2014 10:47, Anton Shterenlikht пишет:
From b...@passap.ru Mon Apr 7 21:41:34 2014
The errors are from cups-image now:
http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/logs/cups-image-1.7.1.log
Please test the attached patch (apply to print/cups-base and
test print/cups-image).
yes, fixes the problem,
Le Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:05:00 +1000,
Robert Backhaus rob...@robbak.com a écrit :
I've got a printing problem with the new cups.
I've got a similar problem with cups 1.7 and a Lexmark T640
using the foomatic filters. I've to use Generic Postcript printer to
make it works again.
That worked fine
Hi,
Have tried building Apache on a recently upgraded ports collection for linking
Apache, php and all against openssl new port…. but no way of ending up that
way….
I see always :
ldd /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so
/usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so:
libssl.so.7 =
08.04.2014 13:55, Patrick Lamaiziere пишет:
Le Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:05:00 +1000,
Robert Backhaus rob...@robbak.com a écrit :
I've got a printing problem with the new cups.
I've got a similar problem with cups 1.7 and a Lexmark T640
using the foomatic filters. I've to use Generic Postcript
This seems to be an Apache issue when being built…. I say this because Postfix
por example runs at first attempt as it should….
ldd /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd
/usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd:
libpcre.so.3 = /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3 (0x800889000)
libssl.so.8 =
On 08.04.2014 08:00, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
If people are using a port, then I would agree it should be kept
regardless of maintainer status. But that doesn't mean keeping
everything forever as long as it compiles.
Why not? Why not keep everything forever as long as it
Perhaps it is an option for you to switch to Apache 24.
On my machine Apache 24 picks OpenSSL from the ports without any special
adjustments:
ldd /usr/local/libexec/apache24/mod_ssl.so
/usr/local/libexec/apache24/mod_ssl.so:
libssl.so.8 = /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x801238000)
Port Maintainers,
Just a suggestion: If you are going to remove an option from your port, it
would be nice if you would make the port break when that option is used. We
build our own packages with custom options and this little issue just caused
some issues for us. We can’t watch updates to
On 2014-04-08, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
The most recent list included not only software for interfacing with old
video-cameras -- various modules for xmms, for example, are on the
chopping block too, for just another example. Why?..
I was wondering about the XMMS modules,
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:57:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.04.2014 08:00, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
If people are using a port, then I would agree it should be kept
regardless of maintainer status. But that doesn't mean keeping
everything forever as long as it compiles.
Why
Add a port of system clock synchronization client and server (chrony).
WWW: http://chrony.tuxfamily.org/
PR: ports/174263
-
Build ID: 20140408170800-59209
Job owner: da...@freebsd.org
Buildtime:
On 08.04.2014 12:55, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:57:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.04.2014 08:00, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
If people are using a port, then I would agree it should be kept
regardless of maintainer status. But that doesn't mean keeping
Hi,
seeing r350552 I fixed something related locally as below. I don't think
the fix is 100% correct (cause I haven't the faintest clue how
compiler.mk actually sets compiler flags), but it does the job and gets
rid of lang/gcc.
I do think that the testing for _CXXINTERNAL in Uses/compiler.mk
On 4/8/2014 16:30, Dave Duchscher wrote:
Port Maintainers,
Just a suggestion: If you are going to remove an option from your
port, it would be nice if you would make the port break when that
option is used. We build our own packages with custom options and
this little issue just caused
Good Afternoon,
I don't know if you are aware of it, but SMPlayer 14.3 is broken. The
underlying mplayer still works fine if launched from the CLI.
Here is my post with the error codes, along with another having the
issue: https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=19t=45843
I am not
On 04/08/14 18:12, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.04.2014 12:55, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:57:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.04.2014 08:00, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
If people are using a port, then I would agree it should be kept
regardless of maintainer status.
Hi,
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote:
/var/db/pkg only contains these files:
$ find /var/db/pkg
[...]
/var/db/pkg/libyaml-0.1.6
/var/db/pkg/libyaml-0.1.6/distfiles
/var/db/pkg/gcc-ecj-4.5
/var/db/pkg/gcc-ecj-4.5/distfiles
/var/db/pkg/cmake-modules-2.8.10.2
Hello,
is there a way to have parent directories of files be created with same
owner or permissions as the files?
In addition:
@mode a+w
...
@mode
behaves unexpected. chmod a+w doesn't clear r and x, yet mode in
pkg-plist does so I end up with files that have -w--w--w-. And of course
their
Hi all,
I really enjoy using pkgng, and I love that all my packages are build on
a clean system without any possible quirks.
I found that installing from ports is a bit of a pain on these machines
however, because I don't have any of the development packages installed
(gcc47 etc). I found
Am 2014-04-02 19:34, schrieb Juergen Lock:
Hi!
This just came up on irc (before I saw this thread), and I got the
current
port to build on 10.0 and also with clang34 from ports using the patch
below, maybe it helps. :) (I didn't run-test other than starting it
once tho.)
Juergen
On 2014-04-08 12:03, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote:
Hi,
Have tried building Apache on a recently upgraded ports collection for
linking Apache, php and all against openssl new port…. but no way of ending
up that way….
I see always :
ldd /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so
Look at poudriere its really good for exactly this, can even cross build
different versions.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Chris Rees cr...@physics.org
To: po...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:45 PM
Subject: Quickly cleanroom building and installing
On 6-4-2014 4:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 5/04/2014 9:12 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Op 5 apr. 2014 om 05:48 heeft Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz het
volgende geschreven:
On 04/04/2014 22:42, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to upgrade my python 2.7 which did not work.
Hi,
I understand that you are the maintainer of the Hadoop port on FreeBSD. I was
wondering if there were any plans to port Hadoop 2.2.x to FreeBSD? I'd be
willing to help if I can, though may not have the right skills…
Very best regards.
Steve
Hi Steve;
I've been very busy lately on other projects. I did look at porting the new
hadoop and despite of the fact that you have to fetch a bunch of dependencies,
it is not terribly difficult.
It is completely different to the existing port though so it should probably be
a new port
Thanks. I'll take a look and let you know how it goes...
Steve
Sent from my iPad
On 8 Apr 2014, at 22:46, Pedro Giffuni
p...@apache.orgmailto:p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Steve;
I've been very busy lately on other projects. I did look at porting the new
hadoop and despite of the fact that you
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:12:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.04.2014 12:55, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:57:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.04.2014 08:00, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
If people are using a port, then I would agree it should be kept
regardless of
Tijl Coosemans wrote:
For xmms there's xmms2
That's no comparison. Not even fracking close. I for one am very glad that
Christian Weisgerber is having a look at the XMMS-related ports.
AvW
P.S. I do agree with your message as a whole, just not with this
particular example.
--
I'm not
On 2014-04-08 12:03, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote:
Hi,
Have tried building Apache on a recently upgraded ports collection for
linking Apache, php and all against openssl new port…. but no way of ending
up that way….
I see always :
ldd /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so
Please use the Problem Reporting system to advise your issue and enable
a volunteer to effectively work with you to resolve.
A common method is http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html
Often its useful to check if the problem has already been raised, and a
fix or workaround provided, by searching
Other useful resources:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=develportname=tex-kpathsea
http://www.freshports.org/devel/tex-kpathsea
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
On 04/08/14 07:08, Boris Samorodov wrote:
08.04.2014 13:55, Patrick Lamaiziere пишет:
Le Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:05:00 +1000,
Robert Backhaus rob...@robbak.com a écrit :
I've got a printing problem with the new cups.
I've got a similar problem with cups 1.7 and a Lexmark T640
using the
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Melvyn Sopacua mel...@magemana.nl wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote:
/var/db/pkg only contains these files:
$ find /var/db/pkg
[...]
/var/db/pkg/libyaml-0.1.6
/var/db/pkg/libyaml-0.1.6/distfiles
/var/db/pkg/gcc-ecj-4.5
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:12:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.04.2014 12:55, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:57:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.04.2014 08:00, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
If
36 matches
Mail list logo
