Re: octave update

2014-06-09 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 19:01:47 -0400 Ajtim wrote: > -B/usr/local/bin -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,__voronoi__.so -o > dldfcn/.libs/__voronoi__.so > c++: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-pthread' > c++: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-pthread' > sed: /usr/local/lib/liblcms

ports tree: svn: E130003: The XML response contains invalid XML

2014-06-09 Thread O. Hartmann
On a box running FreeBSD 9.3-BETA2 #0 r267209: Sat Jun 7 08:40:13 CEST 2014 amd64 I try to update the ports tree, which is at revision [...] URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: http://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-00226

pkg: wrong architecture: freebsd:10:x86:64 instead of freebsd:11:x86:64

2014-06-09 Thread Fabian Keil
I'm looking for a way to let "pkg add" install packages that are known to work but supposedly have the "wrong" architecture: root@privoxy-jail / #pkg add /var/ports/packages/ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_7,1.txz Installing ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_7,1...Installing libXrender-0.9.8_2...Installing libX11-1.6.2_2,

Re: pkg: wrong architecture: freebsd:10:x86:64 instead of freebsd:11:x86:64

2014-06-09 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I'm looking for a way to let "pkg add" install packages that are > known to work but supposedly have the "wrong" architecture: > > root@privoxy-jail / #pkg add /var/ports/packages/ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_7,1.txz > Installing ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_7,1...Installing > libXrender-0.9.8_2...Installin

[QAT] 357133: 4x leftovers

2014-06-09 Thread Ports-QAT
- Remove easy_install dependency - Bump PORTREVISION to enforce a cleanup for the easy_install references With hat: python@ Approved by:portmgr (implicit) - Build ID: 20140609104000-22555 Job owner:

Re: pkg: wrong architecture: freebsd:10:x86:64 instead of freebsd:11:x86:64

2014-06-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:16:01PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > I'm looking for a way to let "pkg add" install packages that are > known to work but supposedly have the "wrong" architecture: > > root@privoxy-jail / #pkg add /var/ports/packages/ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_7,1.txz > Installing ImageMagick-6.

Re: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion

2014-06-09 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
Hello, From: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: Segfault while checking out port tree with devel/subversion Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:59:15 +0900 (JST) > I get segmentation fault while checking out port tree with > devel/subversion. (snip) > Does anyone experienced this? This problem seems to be fixed wi

Re: Database error

2014-06-09 Thread Willy Offermans
Dear Niels and cyrus-imap friends, On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:58:43PM +0200, Niels Dettenbach wrote: > Hi Wiel, > > Am Montag, 2. Juni 2014, 16:44:14 schrieben Sie: > > I already suspected something like that. but I miss some more detailed > > info. > > > > Following plan A: > > > > How can I

net-p2p/linuxdcpp boost headers

2014-06-09 Thread Marko Cupać
Hi, perhaps someone has quick solution until my bug report is resolved: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190600 ===> Configuring for linuxdcpp-1.1.0_3 ===> Building for linuxdcpp-1.1.0_3 scons: Reading SConscript files ... bzrlib not installed Mkdir("build/sconf") Checking for

Re: r356789 breaks rkhunter

2014-06-09 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Frank Seltzer wrote: I just upgraded rkhunter and the installer splatted the sample file over my .conf file. Running 'rkhunter --propupd' now quits with the error message The SCRIPTDIR configuration option has not been set by the installer. This option is now commented o

Re: Database error

2014-06-09 Thread Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat.com)
Am 09.06.2014 um 13:38 schrieb Willy Offermans : > After an unplanned and unforeseen reboot, the problem disappeared. To me it > seems that the '/var/imap/db' directory was recreated automagically during > reboot. As the actual problem started after an update of FreeBSD ports, This was „luck“ - b

Re: pkg: wrong architecture: freebsd:10:x86:64 instead of freebsd:11:x86:64

2014-06-09 Thread Fabian Keil
Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:16:01PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > > I'm looking for a way to let "pkg add" install packages that are > > known to work but supposedly have the "wrong" architecture: > > > > root@privoxy-jail / #pkg > > add /var/ports/packages/ImageMagick-6

FreeBSD ports that you maintain require staging updates

2014-06-09 Thread portmgr-feedback
Hi, You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain does not support STAGEDIR. Please submit a PR to either stage the port or to reset maintainer to po...@freebsd.org if you no longer with to maintain it. If you have already submitted a PR, please ignore this mail. It is possible that

gcc vs gcc48

2014-06-09 Thread Sean Bruno
Ended up in a weird position today running a build. My poudriere instance ended up building gcc and gcc48 at the same time. I thought this was odd. Shouldn't gcc48 supplant gcc for requirements? I know that for audio/idjc it wants a compiler that has a compiler:nestedfct capability, which should

Re: gcc vs gcc48

2014-06-09 Thread Alex Dupre
Sean Bruno ha scritto: > Ended up in a weird position today running a build. My poudriere > instance ended up building gcc and gcc48 at the same time. > > I thought this was odd. Shouldn't gcc48 supplant gcc for requirements? Every port is built independently from the others, so gcc48 is not fo

Re: gcc vs gcc48

2014-06-09 Thread Sean Bruno
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:32 +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > Sean Bruno ha scritto: > > Ended up in a weird position today running a build. My poudriere > > instance ended up building gcc and gcc48 at the same time. > > > > I thought this was odd. Shouldn't gcc48 supplant gcc for requirements? > > Ev

Re: gcc vs gcc48

2014-06-09 Thread Alex Dupre
Sean Bruno ha scritto: > This seems like a broken "feature" of ports IMO. I.e. non-consistent > runs. It seems quite strange to me, poudriere shouldn't exhibits such behavior. -- Alex Dupre ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freeb

Re: gcc vs gcc48

2014-06-09 Thread Guido Falsi
On 06/09/14 17:48, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:32 +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: >> Sean Bruno ha scritto: >>> Ended up in a weird position today running a build. My poudriere >>> instance ended up building gcc and gcc48 at the same time. >>> >>> I thought this was odd. Shouldn't gcc48

Re: gcc vs gcc48

2014-06-09 Thread Alex Dupre
Guido Falsi ha scritto: > It is a bad feature of ports on a live system, poudriere avoids > this...at least it should. It's not bad for ports on a live system, it's a feature to not install many gcc versions if you already have one that can satisfies all needs. Ports and packages have different n

Re: gcc vs gcc48

2014-06-09 Thread Guido Falsi
On 06/09/14 18:03, Alex Dupre wrote: > Guido Falsi ha scritto: > >> It is a bad feature of ports on a live system, poudriere avoids >> this...at least it should. > > It's not bad for ports on a live system, it's a feature to not install > many gcc versions if you already have one that can satisfi

Re: gcc vs gcc48

2014-06-09 Thread Alex Dupre
Guido Falsi ha scritto: > I agree, but there is a consistency problem, different systems WILL > behave differently, for a good reason though :) I'd add that currently if you are using ports instead of packages is because you WANT a different behavior ;-) -- Alex Dupre ___

Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain require staging updates

2014-06-09 Thread Bryan Drewery
If you see a port in here that you use and wish to keep working please consider becoming maintainer of it. Submit a PR with a patch to stage it and take maintainership of it. We need all the help we can get. It's easy to get involved. I myself started by sending a PR here and there. Bryan On

Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain require staging updates

2014-06-09 Thread A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven
Bryan Drewery wrote: > If you see a port in here that you use and wish to keep working please > consider becoming maintainer of it. Submit a PR with a patch to stage it > and take maintainership of it. [snip the rest] Will do (read: am doing). Unfortunately some of these ports require more than j

Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain require staging updates

2014-06-09 Thread Eric Masson
portmgr-feedb...@freebsd.org writes: Hello, > Ports that you maintain that are currently unstaged (NO_STAGE=yes): > print/lpr-wrapper > print/psdim I don't use lpr-wrapper anymore, it seems to me that lpr-wrapper & psdim have been superseded by P. Selinger's upprint : http://www.math

[Stagedir] x11-fonts/sgifonts pending issues

2014-06-09 Thread A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven
Attempting to stagify x11-fonts/sgifonts I'm still stuck with two issues: -1- No license is specified. There's no clue in the distfile and the WWW only reveals that this port is part of a collection of things that are either GPL or LGPL, but it doesn't specify which is which. And the authors can

Re: how to support STAGEDIR with GNU autoconf

2014-06-09 Thread Dirk Jagdmann
With good luck the Makefile in the source of this port uses $(DESTDIR) so everything goes well. It used some other variable, but after I set that one to $(DESTDIR) it is working fine. -- ---> Dirk Jagdmann > http://cubic.org/~doj -> http://llg.cubic.org __

Re: [Stagedir] x11-fonts/sgifonts pending issues

2014-06-09 Thread A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven
Rainer Hurling wrote: >> So, is it permissible-although-undesirable to leave LICENSE unspecified? >> Or is there another recommended solution? > > One possibility could be > > LICENSE=GPLv2 LGPL21 > LICENSE_COMB= dual > > 'dual' means OR, 'multi' means AND, see Mk/bsd.licenses.mk Oka

Re: [Stagedir] x11-fonts/sgifonts pending issues

2014-06-09 Thread Rainer Hurling
Am 09.06.2014 20:41, schrieb A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven: > Attempting to stagify x11-fonts/sgifonts I'm still stuck with two issues: > > -1- > > No license is specified. There's no clue in the distfile and the WWW only > reveals that this port is part of a collection of things that are either > GPL o

databases/postgresql92-server does not honor uid/gid

2014-06-09 Thread Dan Langille
FYI: I upgraded databases/postgresql92-server a system today. Afterwards, I encountered this situation: $ sudo /usr/local/etc/rc.d/postgresql initdb The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "pgsql". This user must also own the server process. The database cluster will

Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain require staging updates

2014-06-09 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:20:52PM +0200, Eric Masson wrote: > I don't use lpr-wrapper anymore, it seems to me that lpr-wrapper & psdim > have been superseded by P. Selinger's upprint : > http://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~selinger/upprint/ > > Thanks for resetting maintainer, please. Done, thanks. mcl

[QAT] 357267: 4x leftovers

2014-06-09 Thread Ports-QAT
Add staging support. - Build ID: 20140610060001-61673 Job owner: k...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 8 minutes Enddate: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:07:35 GMT Revision: 357267 Repository:

Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain require staging updates

2014-06-09 Thread Dylan Leigh
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:19:01AM -0500, portmgr-feedb...@freebsd.org wrote: > You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain does not support > STAGEDIR. Please submit a PR to either stage the port or to reset maintainer > to po...@freebsd.org if you no longer with to maintain it. >

Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain require staging updates

2014-06-09 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:53:17PM +1000, Dylan Leigh wrote: > I use httptunnel regularly thanks to RMITU's asinine wireless. Don't > know anything about staging yet but I will take maintainership and do > it if noone else is willing to save the port. Thanks for volunteering Dylan; I'll stagify it