Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.1 unable to load http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl

2014-07-22 Thread Wesley Shields
Ugh, I thought I thoroughly tested this update. I don't think the problem is related to OpenSSL from ports at all. I botched the plist somewhere. I'll take a look at this tomorrow and hopefully get a fix in. Sorry for the noise, my testing systems have recently undergone some major changes. -- WX

Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.1 unable to load http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl

2014-07-22 Thread David
It worked! Thanks. But now I get this instead. ===> Checking if devel/git already installed ===> Registering installation for git-2.0.2 pkg-static: lstat(/usr/ports/devel/git/work/stage/usr/local/libexec/git-core/git-http-fetch): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/usr/ports/devel/

Re: Any chances to reduce number of gcc ports/packages which are installed as BINARY PACKAGES dependencies?

2014-07-22 Thread Diane Bruce
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Maybe, we should encourage ports, which is needed gcc, to use only one > > version? If many ports needs 4.8, maybe, we should bump "any" version to > > 4.8 for gcc-less systems? And

Crash in the vbox driver

2014-07-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
I've seen the following crash 2 times (separated by 3 months and a lot of system update/churn). Can someone look at it? borg.lerctr.org dumped core - see /var/crash/vmcore.4 Thu Apr 24 10:39:06 CDT 2014 FreeBSD borg.lerctr.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #29 r264823M: Wed Apr 23 09:35:

Re: mass commit needed: python breakage in pkgng repo

2014-07-22 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 22/07/2014 18:43, Antoine Brodin wrote: > But I can still bump PORTREVISION on py-salt as for this specific port > the missing egginfo is harmful? (for most other ports it's harmless) that would be great, thanks. Nick ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: mass commit needed: python breakage in pkgng repo

2014-07-22 Thread Antoine Brodin
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:09 PM, olli hauer wrote: On 2014-07-22 17:34, Nick Hilliard wrote:> sysutils/py-salt has been broken for the last couple of weeks. The > resulting package didn't include the python egg info directory and as a > result, py-salt crashed on startup. There

Re: mass commit needed: python breakage in pkgng repo

2014-07-22 Thread olli hauer
>>>On 2014-07-22 17:34, Nick Hilliard wrote:> sysutils/py-salt has been broken >>>for the last couple of weeks. The resulting package didn't include the python egg info directory and as a result, py-salt crashed on startup. There a PR in bugzilla for this: https://bugs.freeb

mass commit needed: python breakage in pkgng repo

2014-07-22 Thread Nick Hilliard
sysutils/py-salt has been broken for the last couple of weeks. The resulting package didn't include the python egg info directory and as a result, py-salt crashed on startup. There a PR in bugzilla for this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191986 >From what I can tell, this pr

[Bug 187652] databases/ruby-bdb: 'make configure' fails with Ruby 2.1.

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187652 Hajimu UMEMOTO changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved Resolution

[Bug 187652] databases/ruby-bdb: 'make configure' fails with Ruby 2.1.

2014-07-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187652 --- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: ume Date: Tue Jul 22 15:02:20 UTC 2014 New revision: 362546 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/362546 Log: Make it buildable with Ruby 2.1

Re: [CFT] new libdrm with old xorg

2014-07-22 Thread Marat N.Afanasyev
Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi all, I need some testers to have one unique libdrm what ever version xorg is used, we know the newer version works properly with newer xorg, I have been testing so far with old xorg and everything seems to work ootb. Can anyone test and tell me if that works? basica

Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.1 unable to load http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl

2014-07-22 Thread Gary J. Hayers
I get this error all the time, could you expand on reinstalling docbook as I did this and still get the same error. Many thanks, Gary On 22/07/2014 14:01, Wesley Shields wrote: This comes up from time to time. I think most people solve it by rebuilding docbook. -- WXS On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at

Re: FreeBSD Port: git-2.0.1 unable to load http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl

2014-07-22 Thread Wesley Shields
This comes up from time to time. I think most people solve it by rebuilding docbook. -- WXS On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:06:40AM +0200, David wrote: > Path: . > Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports > URL: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports/head > Relative URL: ^/head > Repository Root: https://svn0.eu

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-07-22 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Any chances to reduce number of gcc ports/packages which are installed as BINARY PACKAGES dependencies?

2014-07-22 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Baptiste. You wrote 22 июля 2014 г., 1:46:00: >> There is good news, and there is bad news. The bad news is that >> print/pdftk actually relies on the Java functionality in the GCC ports >> to build. The good news is that it seems to be the only such port. >> >> Mathieu, is there a way

[QAT] 362519: 2x leftovers, 2x depend (??? in lang/ghc)

2014-07-22 Thread Ports-QAT
Fix with texlive - Build ID: 20140722063200-22014 Job owner: b...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 33 minutes Enddate: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:04:44 GMT Revision: 362519 Repository: