Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Hello,
First, I am sorry for my being lazy and not responding to problem
reports on teTeX/TeXLive ports in a timely manner. I just updated
TeXLive ports to 2014 and trying to figure out what problems we still
have now. Please report your trouble to freebsd-tex@ list or file a
PR.
I think
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:06:04 +0900 (JST), Hiroki Sato stated:
> I think it is safe to upgrade a system with TL2012.
> Incompatibilities of TeX engines are quite small though some of very
> old macros were removed in TL2014. At this moment, TeXLive-specific
> management tools such as tlmgr do not
On 21 Aug 2014, at 18:07, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/21/2014 10:53 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 8/21/2014 5:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>>> Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only curren
- Update to 3.9.20140806
- Separate dtv-scan-tables in his own port
- Add XMLTV option
- Create a new user/group for tvheadend
- Improve tvheadend startscript
- Convert manual patching to USES=shebangfix
Submitted by: Dreamcat4
---
Thank for your work, Hiroki!
What do you think about options in texlive-texmf? I'm using a small
part of texlive-texmf, I don't use e.g. bibtex (I write only small
documents, exams), chinese, arabic fonts, etc. - so I don't need these
files.
Other thing: the source files are needed? Can be an opti
2014-08-22 18:07, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 21 Aug 2014, at 18:07, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/21/2014 10:53 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/21/2014 5:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Does clang (in 10-STABLE or CURRENT) support also the
option -fstack-protector-strong ?
Not sure if clang 3.4 has it,
On , Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect LDFLAGS.
To enabl
On 8/22/2014 1:16 PM, mikej wrote:
> On , Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>>
>>> Support may be added for earlier i386 release
Scenario:
I have a program (several, actually) I need to install from the
generic package repository.
These programs depend on openldap-client; however I have
openldap-sasl-client installed. In my experience the two have been
interchangeable when compiling from ports.
Is there a w
Remove '-devel' prefix from husky* ports
Today the older unstaged husky-* ports were removed as the first part
of a transition move the development versions into their place. This
commit completes the relocation of husky-*-devel ports.
-
Hi!
> > What version of ruby do you have?
> >
> > Do you have ruby-bdb installed? (May be ruby19-bdb or ruby20-bdb)
>
> pkg info | grep ruby
>
> ruby-2.1.2,1 Object-oriented interpreted scripting language
> ruby19-1.9.3.547,1 Object-oriented interpreted scripting l
12 matches
Mail list logo
