Re: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES

2014-09-02 Thread Russell L. Carter
On 09/02/14 04:05, Alex Dupre wrote: > Russell L. Carter ha scritto: >> However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere >> is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to >> enable it. I'm not asking a political question here, just a technical >> one. If this is possibl

/head/sysutils/gnome-system-monitor/Makefile

2014-09-02 Thread Manfred Antar
Log of /head/sysutils/gnome-system-monitor/Makefile Revision 367008 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs] Modified Tue Sep 2 14:23:10 2014 UTC (11 hours, 43 minutes ago) by tijl Add missing library libgmodule-2.0 Reported by:antoine I think if you: Add missing library libgmodul

Re: tmux backspace patch?

2014-09-02 Thread Olivier Cochard-Labbé
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Patrick wrote: > Hi, there: > > > I was just wondering about the backspace patch for tmux. Since upgrading to > tmux 1.9a (from 1.8) where this patch is unconditionally applied, my > backspace key no longer works in the tmux command prompt (e.g. :). I > had to remo

Re: wine (-devel) and i386-wine

2014-09-02 Thread David Naylor
Hi Tom, On Monday, 1 September 2014 22:24:57 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I read something about two days on www.freshports.org about wine and > i386-wine that alters my plans. > > I tried to build i386-wine from i386 with the idea of using it both from > i386 and amd64, in the latter case mounting th

tmux backspace patch?

2014-09-02 Thread Patrick
Hi, there: I was just wondering about the backspace patch for tmux. Since upgrading to tmux 1.9a (from 1.8) where this patch is unconditionally applied, my backspace key no longer works in the tmux command prompt (e.g. :). I had to remove the patch and manually rebuild to get it to work. I'm just

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan > wrote: > > >> This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my >> build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically >> converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails obviously continu

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my > build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically > converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails obviously continued... > however I now have a repo th

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> >> Marcus von Appen wrote: >> >>> Alban Hertroys : >>> >>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand th

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Garrett Cooper
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > > Marcus von Appen wrote: >> Alban Hertroys : >> >>> >>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get >>> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand >>> that you think 2 years is enough time to sh

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Marcus von Appen
Brandon Allbery : On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote: It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those issues in the time between tthe announcement and now If this is an issue that needed to be brought up, then FreeBSD has apparently never before bee

Re: chromium iconify->resurrect

2014-09-02 Thread Russell L. Carter
On 09/02/14 01:15, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Russell L. Carter (rcar...@pinyon.org): > >> Start up chromium, then immediately iconify it. Then try bringing it >> back again. All I get (after a delay of several seconds) is a white >> canvas in the correct size. Chromium does respond

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/1/2014 9:27 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > oh and what was it, 1.3.6 -> 1.3.7? broke > shit... (badly) ... What broke? I am not aware of any new regressions in 1.3.7. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote: > It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those issues > in the time between tthe announcement and now > If this is an issue that needed to be brought up, then FreeBSD has apparently never before been used in an enter

Design & Development

2014-09-02 Thread Abha Barman
Hi, We are one of the reputed Web-solutions Firms with the core skills in website design/development and would like to collaborate with you. We have earned 5000+ hours working experience in developing the professional design with attractive approach in the latest technologies like Joomla, Magen

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread David Chisnall
On 2 Sep 2014, at 12:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > I'm not happy that the EOL was > not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline. I'm not sure what you think the difference is. The EOL says 'the FreeBSD project no longer supports this configuration'. If you are not relying on us for s

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Marcus von Appen wrote: > Alban Hertroys : > >> >> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get >> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand >> that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but >> software vendors aren't that quick. For many

Re: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES

2014-09-02 Thread Alex Dupre
Russell L. Carter ha scritto: > However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere > is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to > enable it. I'm not asking a political question here, just a technical > one. If this is possible, how do I do it? NO_IGNORE= yes --

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Marcus von Appen
Alban Hertroys : On 2 September 2014 11:08, Julian Elischer wrote: On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote: On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote: sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in business is that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not a

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Robert Backhaus
On 2 September 2014 13:30, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Andrew Berg wrote: > > On 2014.09.01 22:09, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > > > >> That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly > >> broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL > >> shouldn't be an EOL

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-09-02 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Alban Hertroys
On 2 September 2014 11:08, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote: >> >> On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>> sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in >>> business is >>> that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not al

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Julian Elischer
On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote: On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote: sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in business is that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not always your choice. The custommers require it.. You should try arguing wit

Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool

2014-09-02 Thread Julian Elischer
On 9/1/14, 7:59 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and operations department You work for the same company as me? in a past life, they were a customer. some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 30

[QAT] 366827: 4x leftovers, 4x success, 4x depend (??? in print/texlive-docs)

2014-09-02 Thread Ports-QAT
Split print/texlive-texmf into two ports, texlive-texmf and texlive-texmf-source. PR: 193202 - Build ID: 20140831202401-3144 Job owner: h...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 36 hours Enddate:

Re: chromium iconify->resurrect

2014-09-02 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Russell L. Carter (rcar...@pinyon.org): > Start up chromium, then immediately iconify it. Then try bringing it > back again. All I get (after a delay of several seconds) is a white > canvas in the correct size. Chromium does respond to window manager > commands (fvwm close, no destroy needed,