Re: On Docs option and custom build target

2014-09-25 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 23 septembre 2014 23:23:31 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía wrote: | | do-build: | @cd ${BUILD_WRKSRC}/ && ${MAKE} | .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} | @cd ${BUILD_WRKSRC}/ && ${MAKE_CMD} doc | .endif | That should be: ALL_TARGET= all DOCS_ALL_TARGET=doc And then you don't

Re: lack of framework and pkg documentation (was: svn commit: r369281 - in head/dns: dnsmasq dnsmasq-devel)

2014-09-25 Thread Mathieu Arnold
+--On 26 septembre 2014 08:31:43 +0200 Matthias Andree wrote: | Am 25.09.2014 um 20:33 schrieb Bryan Drewery: |> On 9/25/2014 1:27 PM, Matthias Andree wrote: |>> Author: mandree |>> Date: Thu Sep 25 18:27:56 2014 |>> New Revision: 369281 |>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/369281 |>

Re: lack of framework and pkg documentation (was: svn commit: r369281 - in head/dns: dnsmasq dnsmasq-devel)

2014-09-25 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 25.09.2014 um 20:33 schrieb Bryan Drewery: > On 9/25/2014 1:27 PM, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Author: mandree >> Date: Thu Sep 25 18:27:56 2014 >> New Revision: 369281 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/369281 >> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r369281/ >> >> Log: >> U

Re: squid-3.4.8_1 leaking memory

2014-09-25 Thread Brian W.
I added my observations via forward to the freebsd ports list since that is the listed maintainer for squid. Brian On Sep 25, 2014 10:11 PM, "Victor Sudakov" wrote: > Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > > >> > > >> squid-3.4.8_1 seems to be leaking memory heavily. Its SIZE and RES are > > >> growing sever

Re: squid-3.4.8_1 leaking memory

2014-09-25 Thread Victor Sudakov
Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > >> > >> squid-3.4.8_1 seems to be leaking memory heavily. Its SIZE and RES are > >> growing several MB per minute until eventually swapping begins. [dd] > I think you should file a bug report https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193938 If anyone has anythi

Re: squid-3.4.8_1 leaking memory

2014-09-25 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
(Bottom-posted) On 25/09/2014 3:48 PM, Brian W. wrote: > You seem to be onto something. On a single user testbox I use I see this > > PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIMEWCPU > COMMAND > > 6100 squid 1 200 612M 84076K kqread 1 4:01 0.00% squid > > I

Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?

2014-09-25 Thread Rick Miller
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rick Miller > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: >> >>> On 09/25/14 20:57, Rick Miller wrote: >>> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Guido Falsi >>> wrote: >>> > [snip

Re: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Rostislav Krasny
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> >> If this is mandatory, why the 'linux_base-f10' package doesn't >> >> check/update it by itself? > >> > Because a pkg or port does not automatically change values in /etc/rc.conf. >> > That should be a concious decision of the admin

Re: pkg 1.3.8 requested but not available?

2014-09-25 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Joe Holden wrote: > RE original post, it is broken because pkg-1.3.7 is the latest in the pkg > repo, whereas if you bootstrap it, the latest is 1.3.8, I just hit this and > had to pkg remove -f pkg and bootstrap again > Is this problem the following? (1) You

Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?

2014-09-25 Thread Rick Miller
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: > >> On 09/25/14 20:57, Rick Miller wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Guido Falsi wrote: >> > [snip] >> > > >> > ===> > >> >

Re: On Docs option and custom build target

2014-09-25 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:54:19 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía > wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:23:31 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía >>> wrote: I have a Makefile for an application t

Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?

2014-09-25 Thread Rick Miller
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 09/25/14 20:57, Rick Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Guido Falsi wrote: > > [snip] > > > > === > > > ===> Patching for bash-4.3.24 > > ===> Applying distribution patches

Re: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >> If this is mandatory, why the 'linux_base-f10' package doesn't > >> check/update it by itself? > > Because a pkg or port does not automatically change values in /etc/rc.conf. > > That should be a concious decision of the admin. > > But how could I know all this before the installation?

Re: games/linux-nwnclient with c6

2014-09-25 Thread Johannes Meixner
Hi Sean, thanks for reporting this issue. > How should I request libGLU in c6 with and without nvidia-driver? > Currently, the port sets USE_LINUX_APPS to either libglu or dri > depending upon the driver. You just did, I'll take care of that port. If you could create an issue with Bugzilla ab

Re: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Rostislav Krasny
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> > Please try: >> > >> > kldload linux >> >> After of before putting the ' linux_enable="YES"' into the >> /etc/rc.conf and running ' /etc/rc.d/abi restart'? > > kldload linux > > tests whether it is loadable at all. The rest makes it

Re: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > Please try: > > > > kldload linux > > After of before putting the ' linux_enable="YES"' into the > /etc/rc.conf and running ' /etc/rc.d/abi restart'? kldload linux tests whether it is loadable at all. The rest makes it work on reboot. > If this is mandatory, why the 'linux_base-f10' pa

Re: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Rostislav Krasny
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> >> 'compat.linux.osrelease': No such file or directory" line in the >> >> following installation log. >> > >> > What does >> > >> > kldstat >> > >> > say ? > [...] >> root@saturn:~ # kldstat >> Id Refs AddressSize Name >> 1

Re: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >> 'compat.linux.osrelease': No such file or directory" line in the > >> following installation log. > > > > What does > > > > kldstat > > > > say ? [...] > root@saturn:~ # kldstat > Id Refs AddressSize Name > 17 0xc040 139e5a4 kernel > 21 0xc6cbb000 5000 ums.ko >

Fwd: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Rostislav Krasny
I forgot freebsd-ports@freebsd.org in the Cc. Forwarding: -- Forwarded message -- From: Rostislav Krasny Date: Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:08 PM Subject: Re: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2 To: Kurt Jaeger On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Kurt Jaeger

Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?

2014-09-25 Thread Guido Falsi
On 09/25/14 20:57, Rick Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Guido Falsi wrote: > >> On 09/25/14 14:56, Rick Miller wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Bryan Drewery >> wrote: >>> >> [ snip ] >>> >>> After creating an 8.4-RELEASE jail and an older, equivalent Ports tree as >

Re: linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I've FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2. I tried to install a package of nVidia 304.xx > driver. This package depends on the linux_base-f10 one. The > linuxulator installation has failed. See the "sysctl: unknown oid > 'compat.linux.osrelease': No such file or directory" line in the > following installation

Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?

2014-09-25 Thread Rick Miller
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 09/25/14 14:56, Rick Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Bryan Drewery > wrote: > > > [ snip ] > > > > After creating an 8.4-RELEASE jail and an older, equivalent Ports tree as > > follows... > > > > # poudriere jail -c -j

linux_base-f10-10_7 installation failure on FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2

2014-09-25 Thread Rostislav Krasny
Hi, I've FreeBSD 10.1 BETA2. I tried to install a package of nVidia 304.xx driver. This package depends on the linux_base-f10 one. The linuxulator installation has failed. See the "sysctl: unknown oid 'compat.linux.osrelease': No such file or directory" line in the following installation log. Is

Re: [package - 91amd64-quarterly] build failure mail

2014-09-25 Thread Boris Samorodov
24.09.2014 14:36, Vitaly Magerya пишет: > On 2014-09-24 08:37, pkg-fall...@freebsd.org wrote: >> You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain >> is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. >> Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix >> build. >> >> Maintainer:

Re: bash velnerability

2014-09-25 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/25/2014 11:13 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 2014-09-25 02:54:06 -0400, Koichiro Iwao wrote: >> Please let me make corrections. The "shellshock" bash >> vulnerabilities are described by 2 CVEs. - CVE-2014-6271 - >> CVE-2014-7169 >> >> The first CVE is already fixed in latest freebsd ports tree

Re: bash velnerability

2014-09-25 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/25/2014 11:13 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 2014-09-25 02:54:06 -0400, Koichiro Iwao wrote: >> Please let me make corrections. The "shellshock" bash >> vulnerabilities are described by 2 CVEs. - CVE-2014-6271 - >> CVE-2014-7169 >> >> The first CVE is already fixed in latest freebsd ports tree

Re: bash velnerability

2014-09-25 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 2014-09-25 02:54:06 -0400, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > Please let me make corrections. The "shellshock" bash > vulnerabilities are described by 2 CVEs. - CVE-2014-6271 - > CVE-2014-7169 > > The first CVE is already fixed in latest freebsd ports tree > (r369185), so far the second CVE is not fixe

Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?

2014-09-25 Thread Guido Falsi
On 09/25/14 14:56, Rick Miller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> On 9/24/2014 3:35 PM, Rick Miller wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Does the EOL of legacy pkg_* tools in FreeBSD Ports affect Poudriere's >>> ability to build legacy package repos? >> >> No. Poudriere sti

Re: Failed ports build of nagios-plugins via Poudriere

2014-09-25 Thread Rick Miller
Disregard the below. I noticed an update the port which occurred after I snapshotted it. Updating ports and executing a new build appears to have resolved it. On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Rick Miller wrote: > Using poudriere to build 10.x packages, including nagios-plugins, the > following

[Bug 193849] www/xpi-conkeror builds from very old source code

2014-09-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193849 Tilman Keskinoz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org |ar...@freebsd.org -- You are re

Failed ports build of nagios-plugins via Poudriere

2014-09-25 Thread Rick Miller
Using poudriere to build 10.x packages, including nagios-plugins, the following error is observed: gmake[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'. gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/wrkdirs/usr/ports/net-mgmt/nagios-plugins/work/nagios-plugins-2.0.3/plugins-root' gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/wrkdi

Push requested

2014-09-25 Thread Loïc Blot
Hi, i sent a new port, rainloop. A very good and modern webmail. Can this port be reviewed and pushed ? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193831 Ty Regards, Loïc Blot, UNIX Systems, Network and Security Engineer http://www.unix-experience.fr _

Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?

2014-09-25 Thread Rick Miller
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/24/2014 3:35 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Does the EOL of legacy pkg_* tools in FreeBSD Ports affect Poudriere's > > ability to build legacy package repos? > > No. Poudriere still supports it as long as you're using an old

Re: devel/git vs gui

2014-09-25 Thread A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven
Andriy Gapon wrote: > I've noticed that pre-built packages for git do not contain the gui > component. Is possible to flip the options' default? > Or, better but more laborious, provide a separate git-gui port? I suppose you could make a slave port. Hava a look at e.g. mail/mutt vs mail/mutt-lit

devel/git vs gui

2014-09-25 Thread Andriy Gapon
I've noticed that pre-built packages for git do not contain the gui component. Is possible to flip the options' default? Or, better but more laborious, provide a separate git-gui port? Thanks a lot! -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?

2014-09-25 Thread Rick Miller
Thanks Bryan... On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/24/2014 3:35 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Does the EOL of legacy pkg_* tools in FreeBSD Ports affect Poudriere's > > ability to build legacy package repos? > > No. Poudriere still supports it as long as yo

Re: pkg 1.3.8 requested but not available?

2014-09-25 Thread Joe Holden
RE original post, it is broken because pkg-1.3.7 is the latest in the pkg repo, whereas if you bootstrap it, the latest is 1.3.8, I just hit this and had to pkg remove -f pkg and bootstrap again who broke it? :) On 24/09/2014 00:29, Craig Rodrigues wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Patr

Re: On Docs option and custom build target

2014-09-25 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:54:19 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:23:31 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía >> wrote: >>> I have a Makefile for an application that provides both examples and >>> documentation. I created the t

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-09-25 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Need help compiling use of std::vector

2014-09-25 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 08:57:17PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 24.09.2014 um 17:04 schrieb Shane Ambler: > > I am trying to compile the new version of a port I maintain and have > > trouble related to std::vector. The code producing the error can be > > boiled down to the following test case