Re: SSH hangs while restarting services

2014-11-04 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:48:03AM +0800, Denny Lin wrote: > > Recently I've been trying to restart services remotely using SSH using a > command instead of entering the shell: > ssh host "sudo service postgresql restart" > > PostgreSQL is able to restart successfully, but SSH just hangs the

CFT: CentOS 6.6 base + userland

2014-11-04 Thread Johannes Meixner
Hello, I've spent the last few hours porting CentOS 6.6 to FreeBSD. Given RHEL6 (and derived CentOS 6.x) policy of no-surprises, it was pretty easy to bump those versions that actually did change. I've tested it with poudriere locally, verified that Skype still works ;-), and would be happy if y

Re: CFT: CentOS 6.6 base + userland

2014-11-04 Thread Kris Moore
On 11/04/2014 15:41, Johannes Meixner wrote: > Hello, > > I've spent the last few hours porting CentOS 6.6 to FreeBSD. > > Given RHEL6 (and derived CentOS 6.x) policy of no-surprises, it was pretty > easy > to bump those versions that actually did change. > > I've tested it with poudriere locally,

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Chris H
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 21:24:38 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote > On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:22:09 +0100 Matthias Andree > wrote: > Am 31.10.2014 um 19:56 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files > >> convenient are taking a lo

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Chris H
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 13:21:31 -0800 "Chris H" wrote > On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 21:24:38 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote > > > On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:22:09 +0100 Matthias Andree > > wrote: > Am 31.10.2014 um 19:56 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> tijl@ spotted an interesting point,

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: gpart(8) -a gives you what you need. If it's truly as bad as all that, mounting the ports tree on a 512k aligned slice will reduce the "slack" you appear to be referring to. zfs(8) also has this ability. Not alignment, but filesystem block size. But that can

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 11/4/2014 2:28 PM, Chris H wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 13:21:31 -0800 "Chris H" wrote gpart(8) -a gives you what you need. If it's truly as bad as all that, mounting the ports tree on a 512k aligned slice will reduce the "slack" ahem... that was s/512k/512b/g The issue of 512b sector stora

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 03.11.2014 um 21:24 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: > Other tools won't change anything. It's the file system that would > have to change which is not going to happen. When the ports tree was > created disks were much smaller and file systems were better (still not > good) at storing small files. To

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Chris H
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:16:09 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: > > > gpart(8) -a gives you what you need. If it's truly as bad as all that, > > mounting the ports tree on a 512k aligned slice will reduce the "slack" > > you appear to be referring to. zfs(8) also

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Adam Vande More
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 03.11.2014 um 21:24 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: > > > Other tools won't change anything. It's the file system that would > > have to change which is not going to happen. When the ports tree was > > created disks were much smaller and file

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:16:09 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: gpart(8) -a gives you what you need. If it's truly as bad as all that, mounting the ports tree on a 512k aligned slice will reduce the "slack" you appear to be re

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-04 Thread Chris H
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 20:29:44 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:16:09 -0700 (MST) Warren Block > > wrote > > >> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Chris H wrote: > >> > >>> gpart(8) -a gives you what you need. If it's truly as bad as all that, > >>>

Re: CFT: CentOS 6.6 base + userland

2014-11-04 Thread Johannes Meixner
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote: > Does running skype require the lemul branch still, or what minimum > version of FreeBSD? It's a variant of Skype 4.2.0.13 which disguises itself as 4.3.0.37. So, actually, neither (yet). It's been floating around on IRC, mostly. --

Re: CFT: Update to xf86-video-ati 7.5.0

2014-11-04 Thread Marat N.Afanasyev
Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: Hi! Before updating xf86-video-ati to 7.5.0, we would like some people to try it out. The reason is that 7.4.0 was crashing for several users, so we want to be sure it's fixed in 7.5.0. Here's patch: https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/graphics/ports-xf86-video-ati

Re: CFT: CentOS 6.6 base + userland

2014-11-04 Thread Kris Moore
On 11/05/2014 00:07, Johannes Meixner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote: >> Does running skype require the lemul branch still, or what minimum >> version of FreeBSD? > It's a variant of Skype 4.2.0.13 which disguises itself as 4.3.0.37. So, > actually, neither (yet