FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2014-11-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2014-11-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2014-11-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2014-11-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden

2014-11-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2014-11-07 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-07 Thread Bartek Rutkowski
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files > convenient are taking a lot of space for "free", we can reduce the size of the > while ports tree by a factor 2 by simply merging them into one of the o

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-11-07 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: What is xmmintrin.h, and why aren't ports finding it?

2014-11-07 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 07 Nov 2014, at 04:36, Chris H wrote: > > Greetings, > Working on a recent 11-CURRENT install > (11-CURRENT #1 amd64 r274134 Nov 5 12:56:14 PST 2014) > svn info /usr/ports Revision: 372176 > > Given the above, and the fact that I have installed lang/gcc-48. > Is there any reason that any port

new dependency for emacs-nox11

2014-11-07 Thread Vick Khera
Emacs 24.4 update in ports pulls in a new dependency: desktop-file-utils. This in turn pulls in a big swath of additional packages including python, perl, pcre, glib. I cannot figure out what this utility is supposed to do, as all it refers to is "make a desktop". I don't have a desktop on freebsd

Re: new dependency for emacs-nox11

2014-11-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Vick Khera writes: > Emacs 24.4 update in ports pulls in a new dependency: desktop-file-utils. > This in turn pulls in a big swath of additional packages including python, > perl, pcre, glib. I don't think so. desktop-file-utils doesn't seem to pull in anything that isn't already required for em

Re: new dependency for emacs-nox11

2014-11-07 Thread RW
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:27:39 -0500 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Vick Khera writes: > > > Emacs 24.4 update in ports pulls in a new dependency: > > desktop-file-utils. This in turn pulls in a big swath of additional > > packages including python, perl, pcre, glib. > > I don't think so. desktop-file-u

Re: new dependency for emacs-nox11

2014-11-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
RW writes: > On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:27:39 -0500 > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Vick Khera writes: >> >> > Emacs 24.4 update in ports pulls in a new dependency: >> > desktop-file-utils. This in turn pulls in a big swath of additional >> > packages including python, perl, pcre, glib. >> >> I don't

Re: new dependency for emacs-nox11

2014-11-07 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/07/2014 09:25, Vick Khera wrote: > Emacs 24.4 update in ports pulls in a new dependency: desktop-file-utils. > This in turn pulls in a big swath of additional packages including python, > perl, pcre, glib. I cannot figure out what this utility is supposed to do, > as all it refers to is "make

Re: new dependency for emacs-nox11

2014-11-07 Thread Vick Khera
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Lowell Gilbert < freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Vick Khera writes: > > > Emacs 24.4 update in ports pulls in a new dependency: desktop-file-utils. > > This in turn pulls in a big swath of additional packages including > python, > > perl, pcre, glib.

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-07 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:08:28 + Bartek Rutkowski wrote > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files > > convenient are taking a lot of space for "free", we can reduce the size of > > the

Re: What is xmmintrin.h, and why aren't ports finding it?

2014-11-07 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:10:51 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote > On 07 Nov 2014, at 04:36, Chris H wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > Working on a recent 11-CURRENT install > > (11-CURRENT #1 amd64 r274134 Nov 5 12:56:14 PST 2014) > > svn info /usr/ports Revision: 372176 > > > > Given the above, and the fa

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-07 Thread Bartek Rutkowski
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Chris H wrote: > On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:08:28 + Bartek Rutkowski wrote > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files >> > convenient are taking a lot

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-07 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:32:25 +0100 Bartek Rutkowski wrote > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Chris H wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:08:28 + Bartek Rutkowski > > wrote > > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin > >> wrote: > Hi all, > >> > > >> > tijl@ spotted an interesting

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-07 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports
On 11/07/14 10:32, Bartek Rutkowski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Chris H wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:08:28 + Bartek Rutkowski wrote >> >>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin >>> wrote: Hi all, tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and

mail-notification only allows Gmail mailboxes?

2014-11-07 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
I've built mail/mail-notification with these options: root@kg-core1# make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for mail-notification-5.4_15: EVOLUTION=off: Evolution support GMAIL=on: Gmail support IMAP=on: IMAP support MAILDIR=on: Maildir support

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

2014-11-07 Thread Bartek Rutkowski
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote: > > On 11/07/14 10:32, Bartek Rutkowski wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Chris H wrote: >>> On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:08:28 + Bartek Rutkowski wrote >>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin >>

CURRENT Revision: 274250 breaks build of x11/nvidia-driver: pkg-static: nvidia-driver-343.22 conflicts with libEGL-10.3.2

2014-11-07 Thread O. Hartmann
Out of the blue the build of port x11/nvidia-driver fails - portmaster is that sloppy that it can not check BEFORE it kills the existent driver and fails to install after the deletion! The src tree is at Revision: 274250 and with Revision r274177 the build works. The failure is: ===> Registe

CURRENT breaks build of x11/nvidia-driver: pkg-static: nvidia-driver-343.22 conflicts with libEGL-10.3.2

2014-11-07 Thread O. Hartmann
Out of the blue the build of port x11/nvidia-driver fails - portmaster is that sloppy that it can not check BEFORE it kills the existent driver and fails to install after the deletion! The src tree is at Revision: 274250 and with Revision r274177 the build works. The failure is: ===> Registe

py27-pillow-2.6.0 fails if tkinter option is on

2014-11-07 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
root@kg-core1# make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for py27-pillow-2.6.0: FREETYPE=on: TrueType font rendering support JPEG=on: JPEG image format support LCMS=on: Little Color Management System PNG=on: PNG image format support TIFF=on: TIF

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/tortoisehg - is not compatible with Mercurial version 3.2

2014-11-07 Thread Miroslav Lachman
arrowdodger wrote, On 09/25/2014 07:48: On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: arrowdodger wrote, On 09/21/2014 11:34: On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: Hi, I tried to install TortoiseHG on FreeBSD 10 (PC-BSD)

How exactly does the base toolchain determine WHICH language to build with?

2014-11-07 Thread Chris H
Greetings, Sorry for the long title. I've been [needlessly] struggling with getting ports within the ports tree to build, on a fresh 11-CURRENT install from 2014-11-05. With custom KERNEL and WORLD built, and installed. Here's my situation, which has worked well since ~8.2; make.conf(5) WITHOUT_CL

FreeBSD Port: ruby21-2.1.3_1,1

2014-11-07 Thread Carol Deihl
Hello, I just installed ruby21-2.1.3_1,1 with the DEBUG option *unset*, and when ruby21 is invoked, it prints out: WARNING: number of probes fixed does not match the number of defined probes (9 != 50, respectively) WARNING: some probes might not fire or your program might crash I haven't used d

Re: mail-notification only allows Gmail mailboxes?

2014-11-07 Thread Jonathan Chen
On 8 November 2014 09:18, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > I've built mail/mail-notification with these options: > root@kg-core1# make showconfig > ===> The following configuration options are available for > mail-notification-5.4_15: > EVOLUTION=off: Evolution support > GMAIL=on: Gmail suppor

Re: How exactly does the base toolchain determine WHICH language to build with?

2014-11-07 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Chris H wrote: > Greetings, > Sorry for the long title. I've been [needlessly] struggling > with getting ports within the ports tree to build, on a > fresh 11-CURRENT install from 2014-11-05. With custom > KERNEL and WORLD built, and installed. > Here's my situatio

Re: How exactly does the base toolchain determine WHICH language to build with?

2014-11-07 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 22:39:27 -0600 Scot Hetzel wrote > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Chris H wrote: > > Greetings, > > Sorry for the long title. I've been [needlessly] struggling > > with getting ports within the ports tree to build, on a > > fresh 11-CURRENT install from 2014-11-05. With cust