Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On 2014-Nov-27 04:11:39 +, B J wrote:
>I recently made a clean installation of FreeBSD 10 on an external hard
>drive, using Mate as the desktop and Slim as the login manager.
What version of FreeBSD 10?
Are you running amd64 or i386?
>/usr/local/lib/squeak/4.10.2-2614/squeakvm
>/usr/local/l
===> Registering installation for gnupg-2.1.0_1 as automatic
pkg-static: gnupg-2.1.0_1 conflicts with dirmngr-1.1.0_12 (installs
files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/dirmngr
UPDATING has no info about this.
Yuri
___
freebsd
Yuri wrote:
> ===> Registering installation for gnupg-2.1.0_1 as automatic
> pkg-static: gnupg-2.1.0_1 conflicts with dirmngr-1.1.0_12 (installs
> files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/dirmngr
Yes, that sort of thing seems to be happening a lot lately. I found out
that
On 11/29/2014 04:56, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
Yes, that sort of thing seems to be happening a lot lately. I found
out that it often helps if you temporarily uninstall the offending
port, then install the other one and finally reinstall the uninstalled
one. Or in your case: 1. delete dirmng
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 13:56:31 +0100
"A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote:
> Yuri wrote:
>
> > ===> Registering installation for gnupg-2.1.0_1 as automatic
> > pkg-static: gnupg-2.1.0_1 conflicts with dirmngr-1.1.0_12 (installs
> > files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/dirmngr
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:39:00 +0100, Matthieu Volat stated:
>The issue was reported[1], mentionned[2], without action being taken yet...
>Is gnupg such an obscure and unused port?
>
>[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195489
>[2] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
PriceAngels.com http://edm2.beelike.com/a/tBUedC$B89iaPB899W3AACW0fEP/lin3
WorldWide Cheap Wholesale
Home : http://edm2.beelike.com/a/tBUedC$B89iaPB899W3AACW0fEP/lin3
New Arrivals : http://edm2.beelike.com/a/tBUedC$B89iaPB899W3AACW0fEP/lin7
Promotion : http://edm2.beelike.com/a/tBUedC$B89i
Jerry wrote:
> The "nvidia-driver" port had a similar problem. That problem has been
> corrected. Perhaps applying the same methodology here would be fruitful.
If doing that would fix it, then at least I think it's good news that the
problems are with individual ports and not with the ports infra
... is now all over the place.
If I rm -rf /usr/local/* and /usr/ports/* and start from scratch to
install a desktop with currently 1036 ports would that help?
Other suggestions welcome... starting to feel a bit desperate now.
Thanks,
//per
___
freeb
Hi!
> ... is now all over the place.
>
> If I rm -rf /usr/local/* and /usr/ports/* and start from scratch to
> install a desktop with currently 1036 ports would that help?
Yes.
> Other suggestions welcome... starting to feel a bit desperate now.
Yes, sorry for the mess. I assume it is perl pac
It seems that the latest official vim package now installs
/usr/local/share/vim/vimrc file with non-trivial content and that vim actually
honors that file. That results in significant changes in vim's behavior
comparing to the previous version.
POLA?
--
Andriy Gapon
Here is the workaround:
> sqlite3 /var/db/pkg/local.sqlite "delete from deps where name =
'dirmngr'" && pkg delete dirmng
Then gnupg would update successfully.
security/dirmngr moved into gnupg, and should be labeled as deleted.
Yuri
___
freebsd-port
On Monday 24 November 2014 23:33:44 Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 24/11/2014 à 17:02:35+, Dave a écrit
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Sorry but I got the same issue. But I'm not sure I understand your answer.
>
> > pkg delete x264 lists the installed dependances
>
> So you deinstall all package depends on x264-
On 11/29/14 19:17, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> ... is now all over the place.
>>
>> If I rm -rf /usr/local/* and /usr/ports/* and start from scratch to
>> install a desktop with currently 1036 ports would that help?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Other suggestions welcome... starting to feel a bit desperate no
I have been using poudriere for a while to build packages locally. I
recently reduced the package server to just the ports that I need to
have custom options. I want to rely on the freebsd pkgs as much as I
can.
However, this has proven difficult because my ports directory is often
ahead of the
16 matches
Mail list logo