Re: persistent svn error message

2015-05-11 Thread horst leitenmueller
hi Scott, you have solved it now ? do you still geht the error if you do an update cd /usr/ports/databases/ svn up ? you can also make a cd /usr/ports/databases/innotop svn diff (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/de/1.7/svn-book.html#svn.ref.svn.c.diff ) which shows you the differences from

damage to pkg's sqlite data base

2015-05-11 Thread Scott Bennett
For nearly two weeks I've been stymied by an apparently damaged record in the sqlite data base used by pkg(8) and pkg-static(8). Unfortunately, it is a record for a port that is depended upon rather heavily, lang/gcc. lang/gcc compiled and linked just fine, but any attempt to install the resu

Re: persistent svn error message

2015-05-11 Thread Scott Bennett
horst leitenmueller wrote: > you can try to follow this posting > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13376483/how-to-solve-svn-error-e155010 > > first: > > svn cleanup (in /usr/ports/) > > if not helping you have to check WHY this node was not updated/ removed or > whatever.. > > hope info h

devel/ruby-build call for committer

2015-05-11 Thread Koichiro IWAO
Hi, I'm looking for a committer for this. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199436 Thanks, -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscr

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

2015-05-11 Thread Yuri
On 05/11/2015 17:28, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: What is wrong with my system? Why does porttree need port openssl as well. It is obviosuly wrong. If I build ports-mgmt/porttree from source, there is not dependency from port openssl. Might there be something wrong with my package database? How can I f

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

2015-05-11 Thread Dr. Peter Voigt
On Mon, 11 May 2015 15:34:55 -0700 Yuri wrote: > On 05/11/2015 15:02, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > > OK, I currently haven't firefox installed and did not download the > > package to do this test myself. But your results go along with the > > output of "make run-depends-list". And back to my initial

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

2015-05-11 Thread Yuri
On 05/11/2015 15:02, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: I changed to base openssl after fighting with latest port openssl. As reported by several people https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198788 You can also downgrade security/openssl port locally to the last known version, and then rebuild

Re: Building www/rubygem-passenger inside Poudriere

2015-05-11 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
Hi Patrick, I hope you're doing well too. The issue has been already reported https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199953 I'm closely working with Bryan Drewery on the issue. -- Sergey A. Osokin o...@freebsd.org On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:15:57PM -0700, Patrick Gibson wrote: > I

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

2015-05-11 Thread Dr. Peter Voigt
On Mon, 11 May 2015 13:08:02 -0700 Yuri wrote: > On 05/11/2015 11:21, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. I have to admit that I am a bit lost with > > the referenced PR: > > Or you can just run 'pkg info -d firefox' - it doesn't show any > openssl dependencies. Running 'ldd' on

gdb in ports

2015-05-11 Thread Jason Woodward
Hi all, I had sent this to Luca but maybe others might have an idea... I'm running into some difficulty debugging a live, multithreaded application. This seems to be the case with the 7.8.x gdbs and 7.9 (both 9.2 and 10 release). When I attach, I see duplicates for the first thread: 5Th

Building www/rubygem-passenger inside Poudriere

2015-05-11 Thread Patrick Gibson
I now seem unable to get www/rubygem-passenger built within Poudriere. It fails with the following error: >> Ignoring www/rubygem-passenger: rebuild nginx with third-party 5.0.7 module, current verion is nginx: not found build of www/rubygem-passenger ended at Mon May 11 12:55:48 PDT 2015 T

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

2015-05-11 Thread Yuri
On 05/11/2015 11:21, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: Thanks for your feedback. I have to admit that I am a bit lost with the referenced PR: Or you can just run 'pkg info -d firefox' - it doesn't show any openssl dependencies. Running 'ldd' on elfs in firefox package also don't show openssl. So firefox

Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?

2015-05-11 Thread Dr. Peter Voigt
On Sat, 09 May 2015 22:25:09 -0700 Yuri wrote: > On 05/09/2015 03:56, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > > > > I am wondering, if www/firefox really depends on security/openssl. > > According to the following, it should not: > > > > This stage-qa test that I submitted half year ago tests if some > package

Re: pkg 1.5.1 wants to remove locked packages

2015-05-11 Thread Michael Jung
On 2015-04-27 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:21:40AM -0400, Michael Jung wrote: Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but pkg 1.5.1 wants to remove locked packages. The packages are indeed really removed. Thanks. --mikej "pkg lock is used to lock packages against r

Re: persistent svn error message

2015-05-11 Thread horst leitenmueller
hi Scott, you can try to follow this posting http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13376483/how-to-solve-svn-error-e155010 first: svn cleanup (in /usr/ports/) if not helping you have to check WHY this node was not updated/ removed or whatever.. hope info helps a little br horst > On 11 May

persistent svn error message

2015-05-11 Thread Scott Bennett
For the last three weeks, every time I run "svn update /usr/ports", it seems to run normally, but always ends with the line, svn: E155010: The node '/usr/ports/databases/innotop/distinfo' was not found. Does anyone know what might have caused this message to start appearing at that time? Is

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2015-05-11 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Wrong security audit for mail/postfix ?

2015-05-11 Thread Cristiano Deana
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:35 AM, olli hauer wrote: Hi, > Hi Cristiano, > > this should be fixed.meanwhile. > > Please run the command > # pkg audit -F Confirmed, fixed. Thanks. -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/

Re: Wrong security audit for mail/postfix ?

2015-05-11 Thread olli hauer
On May 11, 2015 9:38:46 AM CEST, Cristiano Deana wrote: > Hi, > > this morning I got for my mailservers > > # pkg audit > postfix-2.11.4,1 is vulnerable: > postfix -- plaintext command injection with SMTP over TLS > CVE: CVE-2011-0411 > WWW: > http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/14a6f516-502f-11e

Re: lang/mono Updated to Mono v4.0.1

2015-05-11 Thread Anders Jensen-Waud
Thanks. I have submitted the PR here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200118 On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/05/2015 06:48, Anders Jensen-Waud wrote: > > As part of our effort to port CoreCLR and the Roslyn compiler collection > to > > FreeBSD,

Wrong security audit for mail/postfix ?

2015-05-11 Thread Cristiano Deana
Hi, this morning I got for my mailservers # pkg audit postfix-2.11.4,1 is vulnerable: postfix -- plaintext command injection with SMTP over TLS CVE: CVE-2011-0411 WWW: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/14a6f516-502f-11e0-b448-bbfa2731f9c7.html postfix-2.11.4,1 is vulnerable: Postfix -- memory co

Re: lang/mono Updated to Mono v4.0.1

2015-05-11 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 11/05/2015 06:48, Anders Jensen-Waud wrote: > As part of our effort to port CoreCLR and the Roslyn compiler collection to > FreeBSD, it has been necessary for us to have a working version of Mono > v4.0.1 on FreeBSD. > > The version in Ports is on version 3.x, which is getting quite old. So I >