Hello, Rudd,
https://github.com/phalcon/cphalcon/issues/10531#issuecomment-114001065
We could ignore the warning.
Thanks.
2015-06-22 10:30 GMT+08:00 Daniel Lin :
> Hello, Ruud,
>
> Thanks, I'll keep in mind.
>
> And I find 2.0.3 is out, will port it soon.
>
> Thanks.
Hello, Ruud,
Thanks, I'll keep in mind.
And I find 2.0.3 is out, will port it soon.
Thanks.
2015-06-19 22:36 GMT+08:00 Ruud Boon :
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I saw some warnings while compiling Phalcon 2.0.2. In the end is works
> fine but just want to let you know.
>
> Thnx for maintaining
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:48:39 -0400
kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:33:08AM +0300, ??? ??? wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I apologize for my English, I use a translator.
> > I noticed that when I install gxneur is one problem. Xneur
> > installed and working properly. But g
Hi,
not sure if I can help further, but if I understand correctly, yes - ruby
2.0. is/was default.
*pkg audit* (after forced upgrade)
ruby-2.0.0.645,1 is vulnerable:
Ruby -- OpenSSL Hostname Verification Vulnerability
CVE: CVE-2015-1855
WWW:
https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/d4379f59-3e9b-49eb-93
Hi,
Did you build your own ports where ruby 2.0 was default? I see the package name
here is ruby-2.0.0.645,1, not ruby20-2.0.0.645,1. The entries in vuxml look
like this:
3326 ruby20
3327 2.0.0.645,1
...
3330 ruby
3331 2.1.6,1
So I think maybe it's matching
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
