FreeBSD Port: mpdscribble-0.22_1

2015-08-31 Thread Stephen Morton
Hey, mpdscribble is marked as unfetchable, but is available at http://www.musicpd.org/download/ now. -Stephen 8c8 < MASTER_SITES= SF/musicpd/${PORTNAME}/${PORTVERSION} --- > MASTER_SITES= http://www.musicpd.org/download/${PORTNAME}/${PORTVERSION}/ __

Re: [HEADS-UP] switching default Perl to 5.22

2015-08-31 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Patrick Powell wrote: > Please do not switch to a new version of Perl until ModPerl2 works. > This, for me, is a show stopper, and I suspect for a lot of people. > > Do you have a list of the current Perl Modules or associated items > that do not work? I agree - though I build everything with my

Re: [HEADS-UP] switching default Perl to 5.22

2015-08-31 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Patrick Powell wrote: > Please do not switch to a new version of Perl until ModPerl2 works. > This, for me, is a show stopper, and I suspect for a lot of people. > > Do you have a list of the current Perl Modules or associated items > that do not work? I agree - though I build everything with my

Re: [HEADS-UP] switching default Perl to 5.22

2015-08-31 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Patrick Powell wrote: > Ummm... Guilty as charged. The only reason I updated to 5.20 was that > the pkg repository changed. > > However, I think that making 5.22 the default before fixing up (for > me at least) some issues with > modperl support might be a bit premature. > > Just for my informat

Re: [HEADS-UP] switching default Perl to 5.22

2015-08-31 Thread Patrick Powell
Please do not switch to a new version of Perl until ModPerl2 works. This, for me, is a show stopper, and I suspect for a lot of people. Do you have a list of the current Perl Modules or associated items that do not work? On 08/28/15 08:06, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! In one or two weeks, I'll be

Re: [HEADS-UP] switching default Perl to 5.22

2015-08-31 Thread Patrick Powell
On 08/28/15 09:16, Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 28 août 2015 19:11:21 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote: | Previous policy, even if informal, was to wait for 5.xx.1 before bringing | the port to the tree. May be, we should wait for xx.1 before switching | the default port, at least ? The previous

Re: FreeBSD Port: lighttpd-1.4.36

2015-08-31 Thread Guido Falsi
On 09/01/15 00:03, dutchman01 wrote: > Hi, > > > > Can you please upgrade lighttpd-1.4.36 to ighttpd-1.4.37. I just took the PR with the update (bug 202637), which was added little time ago, I just need a little time still for testing. Will commit shortly. Please note that the new version got

FreeBSD Port: lighttpd-1.4.36

2015-08-31 Thread dutchman01
Hi, Can you please upgrade lighttpd-1.4.36 to ighttpd-1.4.37. It contains a lot of fixes for freebsd too http://www.lighttpd.net/ Regards, Dutchman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

2015-08-31 Thread Oliver Pinter
Hi! On 8/31/15, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> There are currently two remaining PRs with patches for mail/ifile >> (202572) and net-p2p/namecoin (2012603), getting those committed soon >> would avoid traumas in the ports tree once FORTIFY_SOURCE is committed. > > 202572: done. Cool! Thank you! >

Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

2015-08-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > There are currently two remaining PRs with patches for mail/ifile > (202572) and net-p2p/namecoin (2012603), getting those committed soon > would avoid traumas in the ports tree once FORTIFY_SOURCE is committed. 202572: done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

[CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

2015-08-31 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Dear ports developers; This year I mentored Oliver Pinter's GSoC project [1] to port FORTIFY_SOURCE to FreeBSD. The project was more complex than we thought initially but it was successful. For those of you that haven't heard of it, it's a trick supported by libc to enable bounds-checking on co

Re: tn5250 port

2015-08-31 Thread Bob Dobbs
No verbose output or any useful info in the log file. When debugging, I see this: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x000800a8fdd4 in tn5250_terminal_config () from /usr/local/lib/lib5250.so.0 In /usr/local/lib I do see these 5250 files: lib5250.alib5250.so

unable to boostrap go

2015-08-31 Thread Vick Khera
I build my own customized packages using poudriere. Lately (roughy about when go changed from 1.4 to 1.5) it cannot build the go 1.4.2 bootstrap. It fails with a bus error. This also is roughly about the time I upgraded my poudriere server from 10.1 to 10.2. Is anyone observing this? Any hints on

Re: bug report 198925

2015-08-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198925 > > Could anyone please look at this bug report? Done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2015-08-31 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

bug report 198925

2015-08-31 Thread Pavel Timofeev
Good day! https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198925 Could anyone please look at this bug report? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd

Re: gnupg and insecure memory

2015-08-31 Thread Carlos J Puga Medina
Hi, Try to add 'no-secmem-warning' in $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf Regards, -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint = C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part