Re: Speedup ports install

2015-10-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:05:49PM -0700, sor...@cydem.org wrote: > > Howdy! > > I have a suggestion: to significantly speedup the packaging phase > when installing ports, pass '-f tgz' flag to `pkg create`: >--- Mk/bsd.commands.mk (revision 400371) >+++ Mk/bsd.commands.mk (working co

Re: Speedup ports install

2015-10-28 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 08:22:34AM +0100 I heard the voice of Baptiste Daroussin, and lo! it spake thus: > > IIRC portmaster only creates packages as backup of the installed > version just in case the new package will fail it can reinstall the > old one in that case, yes a tgz would be way faster,

Re: Speedup ports install

2015-10-28 Thread A.J. "Fonz" van Werven
Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > IIRC portmaster only creates packages as backup of the installed version > just in case the new package will fail it can reinstall the old one [snip] > Note that the backup thing of portmaster could now possibly be removed > since the ports tree support staging because

How to make a port require at least one option?

2015-10-28 Thread A.J. "Fonz" van Werven
Hi all, I'm working on a port that has two options, of which at least one must be selected, but selecting both is OK too. Can somebody please point me to an existing port (surely there must be some already) that has this, so I can see how to use the options framework in this case? Thanks in advan

Re: How to make a port require at least one option?

2015-10-28 Thread Michelle Sullivan
A.J. "Fonz" van Werven wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on a port that has two options, of which at least one must be > selected, but selecting both is OK too. Can somebody please point me to an > existing port (surely there must be some already) that has this, so I can > see how to use the options

Re: How to make a port require at least one option?

2015-10-28 Thread Torsten Zuehlsdorff
Hello Fonz, I'm working on a port that has two options, of which at least one must be selected, but selecting both is OK too. Can somebody please point me to an existing port (surely there must be some already) that has this, so I can see how to use the options framework in this case? Have a l

Re: How to make a port require at least one option?

2015-10-28 Thread A.J. "Fonz" van Werven
Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > You are looking for multiple-choice. That's the one I overlooked. Thanks! AvW -- I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Seafile/Seahub stack update with a dependence update.

2015-10-28 Thread Jingfeng Yan via freebsd-ports
HI Ricky, I recently have a new family member and I can not continue to maintain the ports for some time.  I am sorry.  Best, Jingfeng On Monday, October 19, 2015 8:36 PM, Ricky Gallamore wrote: www/seahub        https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3943www/py-seafdav   https://reviews.fre

Re: hung poudriere bulk recovery

2015-10-28 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 10/23/2015 9:34 AM, Russell L. Carter wrote: > > Greetings, > > Recently my nightly cron poudriere builds have been occasionally > hanging. For instance, here's last night's, with apparently no > progress for over 10 hours: > > root@terpsichore> poudriere status > SET PORTS JAIL

Re: hung poudriere bulk recovery

2015-10-28 Thread Russell L. Carter
Hi Bryan, On 10/28/15 15:10, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 10/23/2015 9:34 AM, Russell L. Carter wrote: Greetings, Recently my nightly cron poudriere builds have been occasionally hanging. For instance, here's last night's, with apparently no progress for over 10 hours: root@terpsichore> poudrier

How to follow changes to porting best practices?

2015-10-28 Thread Mel Pilgrim
Nearly every time I send a maintainer update, there's some new method I don't know about. There's nothing about it on ports or ports-announce and porttools/portlint don't mention it either. I end up scanning through commits to ports/head/Mk to find them after the fact. What do I need to do t

Re: How to follow changes to porting best practices?

2015-10-28 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 10/28/2015 5:36 PM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > Nearly every time I send a maintainer update, there's some new method I > don't know about. There's nothing about it on ports or ports-announce > and porttools/portlint don't mention it either. I end up scanning > through commits to ports/head/Mk to fin