Hi,
I've noticed recently that a number of ports with MASTER_SITES= LOCAL/ have
been marked BROKEN due to being unfetchable. Should local master sites on
people.freebsd.org be defined differently? Has there been a change in
policy?
--
Cheers,
Cy Schubert or
FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://w
+--On 22 avril 2016 17:43:07 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía
wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I noticed that there is an apparently functional redports.org site
| again. Is it functional? All I get is a "No authenticated" message
| when I try to log in.
It looks like there is a front-end, yes, but it's going to lac
Am 22.04.2016 17:50 schrieb "Fernando Apesteguía" <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com>:
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> I noticed that there is an apparently functional redports.org site
> >> again. Is it functional?
> >
> > Interesting find, thanks! No, it doe
Fernando Apestegua wrote:
> Damn it! I was starting to cry of happiness. I hope it's back soon :)
As much as I loathe the semi-illiterate "language" of Twitter, texting,
MSN and what have you, here's a "+1". Redports was a blessing for port
maintainers and I hope it gets back into full swing soon
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I noticed that there is an apparently functional redports.org site
>> again. Is it functional?
>
> Interesting find, thanks! No, it does not look yet functional.
Damn it! I was starting to cry of happiness. I hope it's back soon :)
>
Hi!
> I noticed that there is an apparently functional redports.org site
> again. Is it functional?
Interesting find, thanks! No, it does not look yet functional.
> All I get is a "No authenticated" message when I try to log in.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi,
I noticed that there is an apparently functional redports.org site
again. Is it functional? All I get is a "No authenticated" message
when I try to log in.
Cheers.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Hello
On 4/22/16 7:20 AM, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 22 Apr 2016, at 13:11, Jim Ohlstein mailto:j...@ohlste.in>> wrote:
The main gotcha with Mailman is that it defaults to supporting Sendmail.
It actually needs to be rebuilt to work with postfix. That's the first
thing to look at. Did you inst
> On 22 Apr 2016, at 13:11, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>> The main gotcha with Mailman is that it defaults to supporting Sendmail.
>> It actually needs to be rebuilt to work with postfix. That's the first
>> thing to look at. Did you install from ports or with pkg?
>
> I built it with poudriere using t
Hello,
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 6:05 AM, Kristof Provost wrote:
>
>> On 2016-04-21 11:21:36 (-0400), Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>> I'm trying to get Mailman working in a 10.3 amd64 jail. Everything
>> works, except Mailman doesn't talk to Postfix. Incoming mail works and
>> posts to the list's archives
Dear FreeBSD friends,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:32:52AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:13:39 +0200 Willem Offermans
> wrote:
> > Dear FreeBSD friends,
> >
> > I have inherited an old FreeBSD beast and I'm trying to update it to 10.3.
> >
> > However the following error
On 2016-04-21 11:21:36 (-0400), Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> I'm trying to get Mailman working in a 10.3 amd64 jail. Everything
> works, except Mailman doesn't talk to Postfix. Incoming mail works and
> posts to the list's archives but no outgoing email is sent. I asked in
> the Mailman list and they
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
+--On 22 avril 2016 11:54:21 +0800 Julian Elischer
wrote:
| On 22/04/2016 11:18 AM, olli hauer wrote:
|> On 2016-04-22 04:04, Julian Elischer wrote:
|>> How can I add entries (like the above) to a port compile?
|>> I want to ADD things to CFLAGS.
|>> If I add 'CFLAGS=...' to the build (for examp
14 matches
Mail list logo
