Re: Best way to submit a port upgrade

Hi! > Background: I have created various ports, but I have never upgraded one > to a new version (i.e. from a new distfile) before. > > I now have an upgrade to a new version of the port. I have: > > - Updated Makefile > - Updated pkg-plist > - Updated distinfo > - New files in files/ > - New

Re: port's svn commit: r413746 - in head "many ports: mark broken on powerpc64": for what toolchains?

On 2016-Apr-23, at 4:17 PM, Steve Wills wrote: > > Hi, > > On 04/23/16 05:50 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> Recently a large block of ports (including lang/gcc6-devel) were >> marked in their Makefiles with >> >>> BROKEN_powerpc64= Does not build >> >> >> Does this only

Best way to submit a port upgrade

Background: I have created various ports, but I have never upgraded one to a new version (i.e. from a new distfile) before. I now have an upgrade to a new version of the port. I have: - Updated Makefile - Updated pkg-plist - Updated distinfo - New files in files/ - New patches in files/ I am

Re: port's svn commit: r413746 - in head "many ports: mark broken on powerpc64": for what toolchains?

Hi, On 04/23/16 05:50 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > Recently a large block of ports (including lang/gcc6-devel) were > marked in their Makefiles with > >> BROKEN_powerpc64= Does not build > > > Does this only apply for use of gcc/g++ 4.2.1 or specific other > verions? If so that is not the

Re: MASTER_SITES= LOCAL/

In message <4ca824b01d94b9a964553...@atuin.in.mat.cc>, Mathieu Arnold writes: > --==A36BF24517E546B86E74== > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > > > > +--On 22 avril 2016 21:30:31 -0700 Cy Schubert

Re: Making a port - debugging cmake check_include_file

Thanks! If speak about general purpose solution, acceptable by upstream, I should 1. make cmake variable like INCLUDE_DIR_EXTRA 2. if set, include it contents. 3. add default value if platform is FreeBSD Am I right? On 24.04.2016 00:55, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at

Re: Making a port - debugging cmake check_include_file

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:51:00PM +0300 I heard the voice of abi, and lo! it spake thus: > > /usr/bin/cc-O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -o > CMakeFiles/cmTC_bd985.dir/CheckIncludeFile.c.o -c >

port's svn commit: r413746 - in head "many ports: mark broken on powerpc64": for what toolchains?

Recently a large block of ports (including lang/gcc6-devel) were marked in their Makefiles with > BROKEN_powerpc64= Does not build Does this only apply for use of gcc/g++ 4.2.1 or specific other verions? If so that is not the only way to have a powerpc64 environment. For example: how

Making a port - debugging cmake check_include_file

Hello. I'm porting Zoneminder, however I have bad luck compiling v4l support. The program uses smale and has the following check: check_include_file("libv4l1-videodev.h" HAVE_LIBV4L1_VIDEODEV_H) if(NOT HAVE_LIBV4L1_VIDEODEV_H) check_include_file("linux/videodev.h" HAVE_LINUX_VIDEODEV_H)

Support : Account need to update

___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

py-* ports falsely appearing as deps

Like plaque, in many installed ports after issuing: # make missing -- devel/py-pytest-capturelog devel/py-pytest-timeout devel/py-pytest-xdist devel/py-virtualenv devel/py-scripttest devel/py-pretend devel/py-freezegun devel/py-dateutil -- I can confirm that for; x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati,

Re: Needing help getting cad/kicad-devel compiled under FreeBSD-9

Hi, thanks alot for looking into this! Unfortunately as it seems I can't workaround this issue by adopting kicad-devel. The final fix would be adopting gcc48, right? Is there a way to force the usage of the ports clang for the compiler:c++11-lib case? Would it be compatible for example with

Re: Is redports.org back?

Am 22.04.2016 22:21 schrieb "Mathieu Arnold" : > > > > +--On 22 avril 2016 17:43:07 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía > wrote: > | Hi, > | > | I noticed that there is an apparently functional redports.org site > | again. Is it functional? All I get is a

Re: MASTER_SITES= LOCAL/

+--On 22 avril 2016 21:30:31 -0700 Cy Schubert wrote: | Hi, | | I've noticed recently that a number of ports with MASTER_SITES= LOCAL/ | have been marked BROKEN due to being unfetchable. Should local master | sites on people.freebsd.org be defined differently? Has

Failure compiling java/openjdk8

Dear FreeBSD friends, In my attempt to juvenile an old FreeBSD beast, I encountered another hurdle: a failure compiling java/openjdk8 gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/java/openjdk8/work/openjdk/jdk/make' gmake[4]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/java/openjdk8/work/openjdk/jdk/make'

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,