On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 09.06.2016 01:19, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:15:04PM -0300, Rafael Rodrigues Nakano wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to download everything required by a port before starting
to
build it and its dependencies (so I can let
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
Your E-mail account was accessed on another device in Nigeria on June 17th,
2016 08:00 PM Eastern Time.
If this isn't you, click the link below and sign in from the device you always
access your email from to confirm you
On 17 June 2016 at 04:47, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hi Ed, I have not got time to look at diffoscope myself yet, but it's
> definitely in my short-term TODO list. Quick question for you though. Would
> it work given two tar.bz2 packages or does it need two directories?
It does
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193406
Kurt Jaeger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|Not Enough Information |FIXED
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Since upgrading to firefox-47.0_1,1 via pkg on amd64 11-current laptop,
the PDF plugin does not seem to work anymore.
Have I missed some change firefox setup?
Thanks
Anton
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Maybe, it is this(?)
=>
Jail is newer than host
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi Ed, I have not got time to look at diffoscope myself yet, but it's
definitely in my short-term TODO list. Quick question for you though. Would
it work given two tar.bz2 packages or does it need two directories? Just in
case it does it as well (although I do not hope for that much), our build
Hi!
> As far as I see, samba36 has the --with-libsmbclient option, which
> is missing in newer samba4x.
libsmbclient is private in newer versions:
lib/samba4/private/libsmbclient-raw-samba4.so
> Someone needs to talk to the samba folks what they plan to do about this.
Indeed.
--
Hi!
> I just testing the www/nextcloud port that was commited yesterday,
> thanks a lot for this!
>
> There I saw that samba36 will be installed (in addition to samba43).
>
> I think the problem is located in port net/samba-libsmbclient which
> refers to:
> SAMBA_PORT= samba36
>
Dear all,
I just testing the www/nextcloud port that was commited yesterday,
thanks a lot for this!
There I saw that samba36 will be installed (in addition to samba43).
I think the problem is located in port net/samba-libsmbclient which
refers to:
SAMBA_PORT= samba36
SAMBA_SUBPORT=
11 matches
Mail list logo