Re: requesting help with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

2016-08-13 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >> .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 > >> IGNORE= builds only on 10 or greater than 10 > >> .endif > > > > That's OSVERSION. The OP asked about OSREL. > > > > (however, OSVERSION is more useful as one can test it numerically; it > > is documented in Chapter 16 of the

Re: requesting help with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

2016-08-13 Thread Bob Eager
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:28:23 -0400 qjail1 wrote: > >> .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 > >> IGNORE= builds only on 10 or greater than 10 > >> .endif > > > > That's OSVERSION. The OP asked about OSREL. > > > > (however, OSVERSION is more useful as one can test it numericall

Re: requesting help with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

2016-08-13 Thread qjail1
>> .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 >> IGNORE= builds only on 10 or greater than 10 >> .endif > > That's OSVERSION. The OP asked about OSREL. > > (however, OSVERSION is more useful as one can test it numerically; it > is documented in Chapter 16 of the Porter's Handbook, if the OP

Re: requesting hep with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

2016-08-13 Thread Tobias Kortkamp
Hi, how about just setting BROKEN_FreeBSD_9= Reason why it's broken since "FreeBSD 10.0 or newer" effectively means "not FreeBSD 9.x". On Sat, Aug 13, 2016, at 21:59, qjail1 wrote: > Hello list; > > I would like to restrict the port to only installing on Freebsd 10.0 and > newer. > > Desire

Re: requesting hep with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

2016-08-13 Thread Bob Eager
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:12:31 +0200 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 > IGNORE= builds only on 10 or greater than 10 > .endif That's OSVERSION. The OP asked about OSREL. (however, OSVERSION is more useful as one can test it numerically; it is documen

Re: requesting hep with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

2016-08-13 Thread Walter Schwarzenfeld
.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 100 IGNORE= builds only on 10 or greater than 10 .endif ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns

requesting hep with Variable OSREL in port Makefile

2016-08-13 Thread qjail1
Hello list; I would like to restrict the port to only installing on Freebsd 10.0 and newer. Desire example of Makefile with OSREL Variable coding and placement of bsd.port.pre.mk statement. Thanks in advance. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 13.08.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Thanks. Now, who has time to debug this 8-} ? why debug? Why not just fetch the phar file and place it as drush in /usr/local/bin and give execute permission to it? Thats it. I do not see any drawback here, even updates will be much easier. Gruß Ma

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Am 13.08.2016 um 12:30 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 > > > > has the update. Would someone do run-tests who understands how to use it > > and report results in the PR ? > > added my comments in the PR. Thanks. Now, who has time to debug t

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Thanks Kurt, Am 13.08.2016 um 12:30 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 > > has the update. Would someone do run-tests who understands how to use it > and report results in the PR ? added my comments in the PR. Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today i

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > drush in ports (www/drush) is version 6.5. Stable version is 8.3.1, > check here: > > https://github.com/drush-ops/drush It's 8.1.3, not 8.3.1 8-} > Has anyone an update port available? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 has the update. Would someone do run-tests w

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 13.08.2016 um 11:55 schrieb Jochen Neumeister: >> Dear all, >> >> >> drush in ports (www/drush) is version 6.5. Stable version is 8.3.1, >> check here: >> >> https://github.com/drush-ops/drush >> >> >> Has anyone an update port available? > Did you ask the maintainer? [1] > good idea, added mai

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Jochen Neumeister
> Dear all, > > > drush in ports (www/drush) is version 6.5. Stable version is 8.3.1, > check here: > > https://github.com/drush-ops/drush > > > Has anyone an update port available? Did you ask the maintainer? [1] > > Thanks > Matthias Cheers Jochen [1] http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.p

questions about Makefile

2016-08-13 Thread Martin Waschbüsch
Hi all, I am in the process of creating a port for a module / plugin for net-mgmt/zabbix-agent. I tried to follow the Porter's Handbook, but still have three items I am uncertain about: 1) The plugin (obviously) relies on the zabbix-agent sources. I added BUILD_DEPENDS= ${NONEXISTENT}:net-mg

Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, drush in ports (www/drush) is version 6.5. Stable version is 8.3.1, check here: https://github.com/drush-ops/drush Has anyone an update port available? Thanks Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof prog