Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:17:10 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:34:30PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:03:51PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> Freebsd-ports could also use a wrapper: >>> % cat ~/bin/gfc7 >>> #! /bin/sh >>> DIR=`id -P sgk | sed 's/\:/\ /

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:15, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:17:10 -0700 Steve Kargl > wrote: ... >> % ldconfig -r | grep libgcc >>6:-lgcc_s.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 >>735:-lgcc_s.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgcc_s.so.1 >> >> Clearly, ldd is looking for 735 but find

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:15, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:17:10 -0700 Steve Kargl > > wrote: > ... > >> % ldconfig -r | grep libgcc > >>6:-lgcc_s.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > >>735:-lgcc_s.1 => /

Re: pkg audit false negatives (was: Perl upgrade - 5.20.x vulnerable)

2016-08-18 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 11:41, Roger Marquis wrote: > > There's also an issue with older versions (perl 5.1*) no longer showing > up in the vuln.xml at all. I've seen perl, php and other critical > network components still in use because the site depended on 'pkg audit' > but did not know that

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:48:28 +0200 Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:15, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:17:10 -0700 Steve Kargl >> wrote: >>> % gfortran6 -o z foo.f90 && ./z >>> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by \ >>> /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgfortran

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:14:32AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > > > For example, on one of my systems, I now have these: > > > > /usr/local/lib/gcc47/libgcc_s.so.1 > > /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgcc_s.so.1 > > /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgcc_s.so.1 > > /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgcc_s.so.1 > > /usr/loca

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Diane Bruce
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:50:49PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:14:32AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > > > > > For example, on one of my systems, I now have these: > > > > entry: 5 > d_tag: DT_RPATH > d_val: /usr/local/lib/gcc6 > > I don't know how EL

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 07:58:01PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:50:49PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:14:32AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > > > > > > > For example, on one of my systems, I now have these: > > > > > > > entry: 5 > >

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:14:32AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:48:28 +0200 Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > how would you solve the problem of having > > multiple, possibly incompatible versions of the same library in > > different directories? > > > > For example, on one of

Warsow

2016-08-18 Thread Tobi .
Please update Warsow to its latest version 2.1 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

2016-08-18 Thread Steven G. Kargl
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:43:04PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > > % cd ~/work/6/lib Dang. This should have been "cd /usr/local/lib/gcc6" > % sed s/gcc_s/gcc_t/ < libgfortran.so.3 > zxc > % mv zxc libgfortran.so.3 > % elfdump -a libgfortran.so.3 | grep gcc_ > d_val: libgcc_t.so.1 > %