a new type of reducer

2016-08-31 Thread zhangfeng
Hello, manager: We have recently developed a new type of reducer. If you are interested, please send me a mail. z...@torkdrive.com zhang feng Sincerely ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

icap protocol error

2016-08-31 Thread genesis lubrigas
I am using pfsense and its package squid is having problem with squidclamav Clamav c-icap service and redirector for Squid and c-icap-modules Modules for c-icap: virus_scan and srv_url_check. When I enable the antivirus of squid proxy, the browser will show ICAP PROTOCOL ERROR. The pfsense

Re: Ephemeral /var/run and creating port-specific subdir at service startup time

2016-08-31 Thread Roger Leigh
On 01/09/16 00:12, Mark Martinec wrote: I prefer to have a /var/run file system reside on a tmpfs as its contents is small and ephemeral in its nature (like pid files, lock files, sockets), need not be preserved across reboots, and should not have to depend on any physical disk. The problem is

Ephemeral /var/run and creating port-specific subdir at service startup time

2016-08-31 Thread Mark Martinec
I prefer to have a /var/run file system reside on a tmpfs as its contents is small and ephemeral in its nature (like pid files, lock files, sockets), need not be preserved across reboots, and should not have to depend on any physical disk. The problem is that some programs/services/ports like to

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2016-08-31 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: mariadb10* ports broken on 9.x since last commit

2016-08-31 Thread Doug Barton
August 31, 2016 12:37 AM, "Bernard Spil" wrote: > On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Since the last commit to the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries >> dump core on 9.3-RELEASE-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am >> assuming that is not the intended

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread olli hauer
On 2016-08-31 17:30, Stanislaw Halik wrote: > On 2016-08-31 Wed 17:21, olli hauer wrote: >> I think this will work for you. >> >> The update interval can be adjusted (default is 30 days). >> In the patch example I've chosen half of the interval, so there is time left >> in case you are offline

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread Stanislaw Halik
On 2016-08-31 Wed 17:21, olli hauer wrote: I think this will work for you. The update interval can be adjusted (default is 30 days). In the patch example I've chosen half of the interval, so there is time left in case you are offline for an unforeseen reason Index: Makefile

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread olli hauer
On 2016-08-31 13:17, James A. McGuire wrote: > Hi there, > > Since no-ip introduced their policy to remove non-updated subdomains every > 30 days. I have to manually go to the no-ip website and confirm that I > wish to keep my subdomain. I believe the reason for this is that my ISP is > only

Re: Split irc/quassel into irc/quassel-client and irc/quassel-core

2016-08-31 Thread Chris Rees
Ben Woods wrote: Hi Max, I run quassel on my home FreeBSD server and again on my FreeBSD laptop. Because I do not want to bring in the numerous dependencies related with the client application to my server, I unset the MONO and CLIENT options in my poudriere make.conf. But of course that means

Re: Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6

2016-08-31 Thread Torsten Zuehlsdorff
On 26.08.2016 21:38, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! About resetting the maintainer, I'll ask around. The rules are pretty clear: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html It's more about: Who's willing to do it ? As talked in private: i could/will do, since

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > On 2016-08-31 Wed 13:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for > >> someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change lies > >> within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding is that > >> the ports tree

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 31/08/2016 9:42 PM, Stanislaw Halik wrote: > On 2016-08-31 Wed 13:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>> It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait >>> for someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that >>> change lies within the scope of what the ports tree does. My >>>

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 31/08/2016 9:33 PM, Stanislaw Halik wrote: > Hey, > > It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for > someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change > lies within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding > is that the ports tree generally

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread Stanislaw Halik
On 2016-08-31 Wed 13:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote: It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change lies within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding is that the ports tree generally doesn't introduce

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for > someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change lies > within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding is that > the ports tree generally doesn't introduce new functionality. I suggest

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread Stanislaw Halik
On 2016-08-31 Wed 13:17, James A. McGuire wrote: Since no-ip introduced their policy to remove non-updated subdomains every 30 days. I have to manually go to the no-ip website and confirm that I wish to keep my subdomain. I believe the reason for this is that my ISP is only updating my dynamic

FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

2016-08-31 Thread James A. McGuire
Hi there, Since no-ip introduced their policy to remove non-updated subdomains every 30 days. I have to manually go to the no-ip website and confirm that I wish to keep my subdomain. I believe the reason for this is that my ISP is only updating my dynamic IP address every 60-90 days, and I

apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-08-31 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, I initiated a long time ago a bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201455 As the new version was broken, I installed the old 4.x version and locked the package. I just downloaded manually the 6.2 version into /usr/local/src and started it from there (it works

Re: Run Dependencies to llvm (for e.g. graphics/libEGL)

2016-08-31 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 31.08.2016 um 12:06 schrieb Fernando Herrero Carrón: > It probably makes sense, yes: http://www.mesa3d.org/llvmpipe.html > > LLVM is being used in more and more projects to optimize dynamically > generated code, in this case software 3D rendering. > thanks, good to know. Gruß Matthias --

Re: Run Dependencies to llvm (for e.g. graphics/libEGL)

2016-08-31 Thread Fernando Herrero Carrón
It probably makes sense, yes: http://www.mesa3d.org/llvmpipe.html LLVM is being used in more and more projects to optimize dynamically generated code, in this case software 3D rendering. 2016-08-31 12:01 GMT+02:00 Matthias Fechner : > Dear all, > > > I just saw that I have

Run Dependencies to llvm (for e.g. graphics/libEGL)

2016-08-31 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, I just saw that I have for some installed packages llvm as run dependency (e.g. graphics/libEGL) that it has a run dependency to llvm36: cd /usr/ports make search name=libEGL R-deps: damageproto-1.2.1 ... llvm37-3.7.1_3 ... Does this really makes sense or is this a bug in one of

Re: binutils version tweak

2016-08-31 Thread Mathieu Arnold
Le 31/08/2016 à 10:35, Dewayne Geraghty a écrit : > Would it be possible for someone to increment the PORTREVISION for > devel/binutils. The last three changes aren't being picked up due to a > constant Version,Revision,Epoch sequence. And two of these changes are > relevant. > Thank-you. From

binutils version tweak

2016-08-31 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
Would it be possible for someone to increment the PORTREVISION for devel/binutils. The last three changes aren't being picked up due to a constant Version,Revision,Epoch sequence. And two of these changes are relevant. Thank-you. ___

Re: mariadb10* ports broken on 9.x since last commit

2016-08-31 Thread Bernard Spil
On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote: Since the last commit to the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries dump core on 9.3-RELEASE-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am assuming that is not the intended result Doug Hi Doug, Nope, that is not intended. Assume this is the 10.0.27