Patch to cmake detect OpenMP

I'm trying to port flann (http://www.cs.ubc.ca/research/flann/) to FreeBSD, but I need that cmake detects OpenMP. Unhappy, cmake do not detects OpenMP even when devel/openmp is installed, so I did this patch to cmake port. What you guys think about? Can I open a bug report with patch? []'s

Re: FreeBSD Port: zoneminder-1.30.0_3

Hello, not many reasons exist 1. rights issue (www:www should read and write to path) 2. fcgiwrap is not working. zms is called by it when user enters monitor page. socket_sendto is not critical error, php front queries zms socket for some data like fps. On 19.09.2016 23:17, Chris Kiakas

FreeBSD Port: zoneminder-1.30.0_3

Hello, This is in regards to the zone minder port on freebsd. I installed it and everything seems to work except for the streaming. I get socket_sendto( /files/zoneminder/temp/zms-075981s.sock ) failed: No such file or directory I left it in the default location and also changed it to the web

[Bug 204515] multimedia/xmms: Doesn't show ID3v2.3 tags

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204515 Christian Weisgerber changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|na...@freebsd.org

Re: svn ad ports web sight out of synic

Hi! > The ports web site > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=qjail=all > shows this > > Category sysutils > > qjail-5.0 > qjail2-2.2_1 > qjail4-4.9 > And svn has this > > qjail, qjail2, and qjail4 > > > Looks like the ports website is in error. Hmm, the website names look like

svn ad ports web sight out of synic

Hello ports list, The ports web site https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=qjail=all shows this Category sysutils qjail-5.0 Utility to quickly deploy and manage jails Long description : Changes Maintained by: qja...@a1poweruser.com qjail2-2.2_1 Utility to quickly deploy

Re: [maintainer change] net-mgmt/cnagios

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Alexander wrote: > P.S. Sorry for my English. Please don't apologise for your English; we are multi-national here (and Americans don't speak English anyway). I know some French, and a small amount of Italian, Spanish, and German; I am currently trying to learn Mandarin.

Derecho Corporativo - En Línea

En línea y en Vivo / Para todo su Equipo con una sola Conexión ACTUALIZACIÓN en DERECHO CORPORATIVO 30 de septiembre - Online en Vivo - 10:00 a 13:00 y de 15:00 a 18:00 Hrs ¡Llegó el momento de blindar legalmente a su empresa! Obtenga el conocimiento más completo que existe en el

firefox crash

When I navigate to www.tdameritrade.com/home.page, it reliably crashes firefox-49.0_3,1, newly upgraded about 2 min. ago (from 49.0_2,1, upgraded Saturday, which also crashed), complete w/ firefox.core in my home directory: [wam@kabini1, ~, 8:37:25am] 309 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local

Re: Dehydrated

On 2016-09-19 13:58, JosC wrote: Btw, can someone tell me what the logic is between the new name dehydrated and its functionality (domain certification)? Don't see it yet :-) It seems to allude to instant drinks (dehydrated): just add water and it does all the rest by magic - you obtain a

Re: Dehydrated

In een bericht van 17-9-2016 1:38: After switching from letsencrypt to dehydrated, the upgrade to the latest port version keeps appearing when running Is solved - for some reason letsencrypts was still installed although it didn't show in my pkg list. After deinstalling it an re-installing

Re: linux_base-c6 (....) on amd64 without x86_64 support

El día Monday, September 19, 2016 a las 01:51:19PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans escribió: > > I set in /etc/make.conf: > > > > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6_64 > > > > the package is built as linux_base-c6_64-6.7_1.txz and has 64-bit > > support (and 32-bit too). Why do I have to set this extra

Re: linux_base-c6 (....) on amd64 without x86_64 support

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:50:17 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote: > I have compiled my ports with poudriere on amd64, based on ports r414411 > at the moment, and learned that the linux*c6 packages does not have > x86_64 support; I recompiled as test emulators/linux_base-c6 and only if >

Re: Checking port option descriptions

> On 19 Sep 2016, at 12:59 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > In the end of this story - we are no longer using ports versions for any PHP > web applications. We are using them directly because ports were more > problematic. We use various PHP packages from ports for a larger

Re: Checking port option descriptions

Matthew Seaman wrote on 09/19/2016 11:13: On 09/19/16 08:48, Miroslav Lachman wrote: The next problem is options doing nothing to "this" port but just pull some other port as dependency because maintainer thinks it is useful for the end users to have installed it too - this should be avoided

linux_base-c6 (....) on amd64 without x86_64 support

Hello, I have compiled my ports with poudriere on amd64, based on ports r414411 at the moment, and learned that the linux*c6 packages does not have x86_64 support; I recompiled as test emulators/linux_base-c6 and only if I set in /etc/make.conf: OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6_64 the package is

Re: OpenSSL port ASM removal

> On 19 Sep 2016, at 11:35 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > 3. Is AESNI support considered a must-have feature for the > OpenSSL port in FreeBSD or not? How about base OpenSSL? And > how does this affect the plans to switch to OpenSSL from ports > by default that would

Re: OpenSSL port ASM removal

Hi Dirk, > On 19 Sep 2016, at 11:22 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote: > >> ASM support for OpenSSL is missing from the port now, >> which is kind of unfortunate for two reasons: >> (a) FreeBSD base (at least for i386 and amd64) has it. >> (b) ASM is required for AESNI to work

Re: Checking port option descriptions

On 09/19/16 08:48, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > The next problem is options doing nothing to "this" port but just pull > some other port as dependency because maintainer thinks it is useful for > the end users to have installed it too - this should be avoided (IMHO). I must respectfully disagree

Re: Checking port option descriptions

Warren Block wrote on 09/16/2016 17:52: Ports options ask the user to make a decision on whether to enable that option. Option descriptions are critical for this, giving the user information to help them make that decision. Unfortunately, what is clear to the porter is often not clear to a

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

OpenSSL port ASM removal

Hi all, ASM support for OpenSSL is missing from the port now, which is kind of unfortunate for two reasons: (a) FreeBSD base (at least for i386 and amd64) has it. (b) ASM is required for AESNI to work last time I checked. Why was it removed? It's not clear from the commit message. LibreSSL

Re: VirtualBox can't attach USB devices

+1. I have USB token and windows xp on vbox, after lattest vbox update I can't use this usb key on vm :( 2016-09-19 9:25 GMT+03:00 Graham Menhennitt : > Sorry, I should have mentioned that this is not a permissions problem on > the USB nodes in /dev. I have followed the

Re: VirtualBox can't attach USB devices

Sorry, I should have mentioned that this is not a permissions problem on the USB nodes in /dev. I have followed the handbook's instructions on setting the group and permissions. Graham On 18/09/2016 4:44 PM, Graham Menhennitt wrote: Hi all, I've been using my Epson scanner in Windows XP