FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-02-16 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Status of synth following expulsion of John Marino?

2017-02-16 Thread Don Lewis
On 16 Feb, Thomas Mueller wrote: > >> For every build - >> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf > >> OPTIONS_SET= OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS SIMD PGSQL IPV6 >> editors_vim_SET= CSCOPE X11 GTK3 PYTHON Yeah, I really like this a lot more than going through all the config screens. Back when I used p

The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Luca Pizzamiglio
Hi all, portmaster, a tool used/loved/hated, is almost in abandoned state. I'm a portmaster user, because, in some cases, it fits my needs. In other cases, I use other tools, like poudriere or synth, that are really great. I don't want to open a discussion here about what it's better, but the trut

Re: Lynis and lsof

2017-02-16 Thread Lars Engels
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:41:28AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > In that case, a note that lsof should be added to PORTS_MODULES on > /etc/src.conf. lsof uses several undocumented kernel interfaces that are > not stable (as they are not intended for external use). As a result, things > can break if

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:08:52PM +0100, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > Hi all, > > portmaster, a tool used/loved/hated, is almost in abandoned state. > ... > So I decided to spend some time to look at it and to work on it. > Thank you! (I'll take a look at your work later; I'm in the middle of

Re: xorg-server 1.18.4 segfaults

2017-02-16 Thread Stari Karp
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 19:21 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Warren Block > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Koichiro IWAO > p> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Konstantin, > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Expulsion of John Marino - reasons and impact?

2017-02-16 Thread Baho Utot
On 02/15/17 21:13, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:42:33 -0800 Dave Hayes wrote On 02/14/2017 15:15, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 2/14/2017 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote: On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: https://svnweb.freebsd

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Baho Utot
On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: Hi all, portmaster, a tool used/loved/hated, is almost in abandoned state. I'm a portmaster user, because, in some cases, it fits my needs. In other cases, I use other tools, like poudriere or synth, that are really great. I don't want to open a discu

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: Hi all, portmaster, a tool used/loved/hated, is almost in abandoned state. I'm a portmaster user, because, in some cases, it fits my needs. In other cases, I use other tools, like poudriere or synth, that are really great. I don't want to open a disc

Port management tools (was: Status of synth)

2017-02-16 Thread George Mitchell
On 02/16/17 03:44, Don Lewis wrote: > On 16 Feb, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> >>> For every build - >>> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf >> >>> OPTIONS_SET= OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS SIMD PGSQL IPV6 >>> editors_vim_SET= CSCOPE X11 GTK3 PYTHON > > Yeah, I really like this a lot more than going thro

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread George Mitchell
On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > Hi all, > > portmaster, a tool used/loved/hated, is almost in abandoned state. > I'm a portmaster user, because, in some cases, it fits my needs. > In other cases, I use other tools, like poudriere or synth, that are > really great. > I don't want to op

Re: Port management tools (was: Status of synth)

2017-02-16 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:19:24 -0500 George Mitchell wrote: > > Yeah, I really like this a lot more than going through all the > > config screens. Back when I used portupgrade, I found that it was > > too easy to accidentally set some option for a port to a > > non-default value where it would per

Re: Expulsion of John Marino - reasons and impact?

2017-02-16 Thread francesco scaglione
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:15:31 -0800 Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 2/14/2017 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > >> On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery > >> wrote: > >>> On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=433827 > >> I thin

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Mark Linimon
I am glad to see that someone is taking on the work. Thanks. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Question on upgrading ports after 9.3->10.3

2017-02-16 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Dave Horsfall wrote: Me again :-) I finally got around to following the notes that David Wolfskill kindly provided (thanks!) and apart from some oddity about "httpd" requiring a missing "libdb-4.2.so.2" (which will get rebuilt anyway), I'm a bit wary of this: 7. Back up an

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Baho Utot writes: > On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: >> I'm looking for constructive critics, feedbacks, anything that can >> help me to make portmaster an actively maintained and used tool. > > If you can have it build in a clean chroot or jail then you'll get my > attention What kind

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Baho Utot
On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Baho Utot writes: On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: I'm looking for constructive critics, feedbacks, anything that can help me to make portmaster an actively maintained and used tool. If you can have it build in a clean chroot or jail then

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread George Mitchell
On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot wrote: > > > On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Baho Utot writes: >> >>> On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: I'm looking for constructive critics, feedbacks, anything that can help me to make portmaster an actively maintained and used tool.

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Baho Utot
On 02/16/17 15:40, George Mitchell wrote: On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot wrote: On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Baho Utot writes: On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: I'm looking for constructive critics, feedbacks, anything that can help me to make portmaster an actively m

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Daryl Richards
While I understand the interest in chroot/jails as an optional feature, I hope it doesn't become required. The current non-use of chroot/jails is, for me, a feature -- not a bug.-- George Having built and packaged linux from scratch using the rpm package manager, I came to find that if

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:48:57 -0500 Baho Utot wrote > On 02/16/17 15:40, George Mitchell wrote: > > On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >>> Baho Utot writes: > >>> > On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > > I'm looking for c

Do I need /var/db/portsnap/distfiles and /usr/port/distfiles?

2017-02-16 Thread Dave Horsfall
There is only the one FreeBSD box in my stable, hence I don't need to build packages for others. It's a somewhat minimalist box (all I can afford), and I'd like to recover some space. Can I just delete their contents? aneurin# du -sk /usr/ports/distfiles /var/db/portsnap/files 965198 /usr/p

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Baho Utot
On 02/16/17 16:22, Chris H wrote: On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:48:57 -0500 Baho Utot wrote On 02/16/17 15:40, George Mitchell wrote: On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot wrote: On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Baho Utot writes: On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: I'm looking for co

Re: Do I need /var/db/portsnap/distfiles and /usr/port/distfiles?

2017-02-16 Thread RW via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:32:17 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > There is only the one FreeBSD box in my stable, hence I don't need to > build packages for others. It's to to do with whether you use ports, rather than if you build package for other boxes. > It's a somewhat minimalist box (all

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:36:24 -0500 Baho Utot wrote > On 02/16/17 16:22, Chris H wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:48:57 -0500 Baho Utot > > wrote > > >> On 02/16/17 15:40, George Mitchell wrote: > >>> On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot wrote: > > > On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrot

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:36:24PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: > Oh no I am now banned as I use synth, whoa is me. This is overstating the matter. May we restrict ourselves to the technical problems/features of the various port maintainence tools, please? :-/ mcl

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Baho Utot
On 02/16/17 16:48, Mark Linimon wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:36:24PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: Oh no I am now banned as I use synth, whoa is me. This is overstating the matter. May we restrict ourselves to the technical problems/features of the various port maintainence tools, please? :-

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Johan Hendriks
Op 16/02/2017 om 23:04 schreef Baho Utot: > > > On 02/16/17 16:48, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:36:24PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: >>> Oh no I am now banned as I use synth, whoa is me. >> >> This is overstating the matter. >> >> May we restrict ourselves to the technical problem

Re: Do I need /var/db/portsnap/distfiles and /usr/port/distfiles?

2017-02-16 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > aneurin# du -sk /usr/ports/distfiles /var/db/portsnap/files > > 965198 /usr/ports/distfiles > > This is a cache, so you can delete it, or trim it with distclean > (installed with portupgrade), or portmaster. Thanks; nearly 1GB here I co

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread Baho Utot
On 02/16/17 17:49, Johan Hendriks wrote: Op 16/02/2017 om 23:04 schreef Baho Utot: On 02/16/17 16:48, Mark Linimon wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:36:24PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: Oh no I am now banned as I use synth, whoa is me. This is overstating the matter. May we restrict oursel

Re: Expulsion of John Marino - reasons and impact?

2017-02-16 Thread Stari Karp
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 17:01 +0100, francesco scaglione wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:15:31 -0800 > Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > > > On 2/14/2017 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery > > > > wrote:   > > > > > > > > > > On 2/14/2017 12:5

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-02-16 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-16 Thread abi
17.02.2017 00:22, Chris H пишет: On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:48:57 -0500 Baho Utot wrote On 02/16/17 15:40, George Mitchell wrote: On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot wrote: On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Baho Utot writes: On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: I'm looking for constr