double location of the jail?

2017-03-11 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I have a CURRENT server with the sources of the kernel in /usr/src: # svn info /usr/src Path: /usr/src Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc

bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on bsd.sites.mk recently. One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) Gerald @FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebs

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on > bsd.sites.mk recently. > > One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, > which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) https first f

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-11 Thread Eitan Adler
On 8 March 2017 at 08:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when running > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade firefox > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even consider > updating fire

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Jan Beich
Tijl Coosemans writes: > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer > wrote: > >> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >> bsd.sites.mk recently. >> >> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, >> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do w

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-11 Thread Bob Willcox
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 04:14:03AM -0800, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 8 March 2017 at 08:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > running > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade > > firefox > > (don't want

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote: > Tijl Coosemans writes: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >> wrote: >>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>> >>> One question I ran into:

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote: >> Tijl Coosemans writes: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>> wrote: As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Jan Beich wrote: >> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. > It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 With that, isn't https pretty pointless? I guess I'll leave things as are, then, for that mirror that offers bot

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:45, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Jan Beich wrote: >>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. >> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 > > With that, isn't https pretty pointless? I gue

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Eitan Adler
On 11 March 2017 at 09:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote: >> Tijl Coosemans writes: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>> wrote: As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger wrote: > On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan >> Beich) wrote: >>> Tijl Coosemans writes: On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer wrot

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger > wrote: >> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan >>> Beich) wrote: Tijl Coosemans writes: > On

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-11 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger >> wrote: >>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (J

Re: Thunderbird and UPDATING 20170302

2017-03-11 Thread Graham Menhennitt
On 09/03/2017 05:09, Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 03/03/17 19:38, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: Any interaction with bug 215348 (1)? I'm still using that patch. Testing revealed that this patch can prevent new profiles from accessing lightning, which I considered undesirable. Ok. I kept tha