Thomas Mueller skrev:
>
> I don't use lynx (text-mode web browser) much, but have run into a problem
> that I never had before.
> Lynx, and also w3m, download what are supposed to be text files and then I
> see the gzip'ed version on the hard drive.
>
> Lynx used to download files as is!
>
> I
> If you're just trying to grab a file, fetch(1) may prove adequate.
> (It's in base.)
> Peace,
> david
>-
> David H. Wolfskill
I tried fetch, but got something entirely different, the stuff on the web page,
but not the desired file.
File compression, such as PKZIP, Infozip, gzip, bzip2, 7-
Hi,
After r439255, "make index" complains of:
...
--- describe.sysutils ---
sh: -m: not found
make[5]: "/usr/ports/sysutils/gcdmaster/../cdrdao/Makefile" line 71:
warning: " -m" returned non-zero status
...
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen
___
freebsd-ports@
I don't use lynx (text-mode web browser) much, but have run into a problem that
I never had before.
Lynx, and also w3m, download what are supposed to be text files and then I see
the gzip'ed version on the hard drive.
Lynx used to download files as is!
I looked through "man lynx", also /usr/lo
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 01:47:16PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
close to 50 ports fail to build because of patch errors
I'm sure you have already checked this, but ...
... when I get this on my powerpc64 machine it is inevitably that I have
run out of s
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 01:47:16PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
> close to 50 ports fail to build because of patch errors
I'm sure you have already checked this, but ...
... when I get this on my powerpc64 machine it is inevitably that I have
run out of space somewhere, usually on /tmp.
mcl
__
Yesterday I rebuilt and reinstalled 11.0-STABLE amd64. I then refreshed
the ports tree with svnup ports and ran portupgrade -af. The result was
that close to 50 ports fail to build because of patch errors, and of
course several hundred dependent ports failed to build.
This would seem to me to
On 4/23/17 11:42 PM, qjail1 wrote:
> I submitted a PR to update a port I maintain and I selected the
> merge-quarterly flag with a ? [question mark].
>
> I see the updated version is now in the pkg "latest" repo, but it's not
> in the pkg "quarterly" repo yet.
>
> How long should it take before t
I submitted a PR to update a port I maintain and I selected the
merge-quarterly flag with a ? [question mark].
I see the updated version is now in the pkg "latest" repo, but it's not
in the pkg "quarterly" repo yet.
How long should it take before the merge into "quarterly" happens?
_
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:32:08AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> ...
> > > FreeBSD amelia2 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r286653M: Wed
> > Aug 12 15:25:51 UTC 2015
> > > root@amelia2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY11NC-NDIS amd64
>
> > You should really update world/kernel first and then update
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 22:37:57 +0200 (CEST) Gerald Pfeifer
wrote:
> [ Old thread alert, but still relevant. ]
>
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> install -m 555 mkheaders
> .../prefix/gcc5/libexec/gcc5/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.1/5.0.0/install-tools/mkheaders
> test -z
> Thomas Mueller skrev:
> > On this computer, I can't get /usr/ports/x11/xcb-proto/files:
> > Skipped 'files' -- Node remains in conflict
> > At revision 439134.
> > Summary of conflicts:
> > Skipped paths: 1
> Have you tried 'svn revert -R .' in /usr/ports? Or a fresh checkout?
> Have
12 matches
Mail list logo