PostgreSQL related NEW PORTS need committers

​​ Hi hackers, I ported some PostgreSQL related tools/extensions to FreeBSD several weeks ago，the PR links are as follows. All of them passed portlint and tested by poudriere testport. Review, comment，test or commit all are welcome，I really hope some of them can be committed before Q3 quarterly br

Re: lang/gcc* package builds vs. release/11.0.1/ and the future release/11.1.0 because of vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t changes and how the lang/gcc* work

Am 29. Juni 2017 18:55:59 GMT+08:00 schrieb Mark Millard : >I'm not currently set up to run more than head on >any of amd64, powerpc64, powerpc, aarch64, or armv6/7 >(which are all I target). And I'm in the middle of >attempting a fairly large jump to head -r320458 on >those. Oh, then I had misu

Re: New Healthcare Industry Email List 2017

Hi, I trust this email finds you well. We have the New Healthcare Industry Email List 2017 with emails, and complete Contact information List Contains: Name, Company's Name, Phone Number, Fax Number, Title, Email address, Complete Mailing Address, Company revenue, size, Web address etc. Our

Re: math/R: Build failure after PORTREVISION for shlib change

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:39:50PM -0300, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > ... > Everything matches. The successful build in poudriere even has the same > line that generates the error for you. I may try ktracing the build > /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar5 -cr libtre.a regcomp.o regerror.o regexec.o tre-ast.

Re: math/R: Build failure after PORTREVISION for shlib change

David Wolfskill writes: > g1-227(11.1)[2] make -C /usr/ports/math/R showconfig > ===> The following configuration options are available for R-3.4.0_1: > ICU=on: Unicode support via ICU > INFO=on: GNU info manuals > LDOUBLE=on: Long double data type > LETTER=on: US letter paper

Re: lang/gcc* package builds vs. release/11.0.1/ and the future release/11.1.0 because of vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t changes and how the lang/gcc* work

On 2017-Jun-29, at 3:10 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Am 28. Juni 2017 22:38:52 GMT+08:00 schrieb Mark Millard dsl-only.net>: >> A primary test is building lang/gcc5-devel under release/11.0.1 >> and then using it under stable/11 or some draft of release/11.1.0 . > > Thank you, Mark. Let me know

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: lang/gcc* package builds vs. release/11.0.1/ and the future release/11.1.0 because of vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t changes and how the lang/gcc* work

Am 28. Juni 2017 22:38:52 GMT+08:00 schrieb Mark Millard : >A primary test is building lang/gcc5-devel under release/11.0.1 >and then using it under stable/11 or some draft of release/11.1.0 . Thank you, Mark. Let me know how it went. In the meantime I'll prepare the change for gcc5 itself. >I

Re: What to do when the port fails in poudriere with "Too many open files" ?

On Jun 28 22:38, Yuri wrote: I have the port that builds fine without poudriere, but in poudriere it always fails with "Too many open files". This happens during the Java build. Where is the limit set in jail? /etc/login.conf doesn't have any limit. What to do in such case? Maybe there is so

Re: /usr/ports -r444615 (e.g.) & head -r320458 (e.g.): sysutils/u-boot-pine64 build fails for arch/arm/dts/pine64_plus.dtb source handling error (gic in a64.dtsi)

Hello Mark, On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:52:17 -0700 Mark Millard wrote: > On 2017-Jun-28, at 7:44 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > > > Is the below a BSDL vs. GPL DTS issue? > > > > In my attempt to build sysutils/u-boot-pine64 I got: > > > > OBJCOPY u-boot.srec > > OBJCOPY u-boot-nodtb.bin > > star