Hi!
> Would someone please commit following PR with maintainer timeout?
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221186
Done. It helps if you note the port involved in the subject 8-}
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
_
On 07/11/17 01:02, bluesky wrote:
Hello. The Retroarch port seems a bit out of date. Retroarch is on
version 1.6.0 now.
Thank you.
Your mistake is that you CCed ports@. As a result, it landed in the
folder for ports@, and not in the personal mailbox, so I didn't see it.
I will update the
Hi,
Can a committer have a look at this?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221835
Thanks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports
Dear committers,
Would someone please commit following PR with maintainer timeout?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221186
With best regards.
---
Yasuhiro KIMURA
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mai
Thanks, Manish. Very non-standard syntax, that.
So evidently when pkg claims that the repositories are current,
as it did, it may be, in effect, lying.
Which suggests that *it* should be doing the forced update as
step 3 in its attempt to get good bits.
[sigh]
[Default] On Mon, 28 Aug 2017
On 08/28/17 16:58, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
> [Default] On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:08:05 +0200, Jan Beich
> wrote:
>
>> Try running: pkg update -f
>
> Are you thinking of something else, perhaps? The man page
> doesn't show an -f switch, and pkg thinks the repositories were
> already current,
[Default] On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:08:05 +0200, Jan Beich
wrote:
>Try running: pkg update -f
Are you thinking of something else, perhaps? The man page
doesn't show an -f switch, and pkg thinks the repositories were
already current, which is why (I suppose) it tried a remote
fetch. What am I miss
I don't know whose idea it was to include GVFS, but it's glued
onto everything and the constant warnings about how this or that
part doesn't work are getting right up my nostril.
Perhaps whoever decided to include it is a hobbyist who, if
asked, would say "well yeah, it doesn't work, but I though
El 28 ago. 2017 11:09, "Mathieu Arnold" escribió:
Le 27/08/2017 à 19:33, Kurt Jaeger a écrit :
> Hi!
>
>> Is it possible to apply a patch in files/ conditionally? I can't find
>> this information in the handbook.
> There's EXTRA_PATCHES, search in devel/*/Makefile for examples
> on how to use the
Le 27/08/2017 à 19:33, Kurt Jaeger a écrit :
> Hi!
>
>> Is it possible to apply a patch in files/ conditionally? I can't find
>> this information in the handbook.
> There's EXTRA_PATCHES, search in devel/*/Makefile for examples
> on how to use them.
>
There is away to fast reference to EXTRA_PATCH
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
11 matches
Mail list logo